Hidden in her profanity-laced attack on President Donald Trump and his supporters was the iconic entertainer’s admission from her heart of hearts—her “super mind”—that she understands that all life is sacred and that a woman’s right to choose an abortion is really a right to murder.

Put simply, the super mind is a deeper intelligence than our conscious mind. It perceives reality in far more detail than the conscious mind and is an expert at observing and analyzing deeper motives while insisting on the truth. As validated in original clinical research, we’ve found that the unconscious mind is a secret genius light years ahead of the conscious mind. Our super mind— the “other 90 percent of the human mind”—sees further, tells more and remains unfailingly honest.

Consciously thinking Madonna was spitting in Trump’s face and at his pro-life supporters, but her unconscious, see-all super mind was actually spitting into the teeth of the pro-choice/pro-abortion group which drove the protest. Thinking she was passionately speaking for pro-choice, secretly she was far more passionately confessing that she understands the violent nature of abortion. Deep down, Madonna was speaking in defense of the unborn child.

Determining reality of projection

How do we know Madonna was projecting onto Trump? As we discovered in case after case in psychotherapy where the super mind was recently discovered, the super mind operates on an absolute moral compass, the same moral compass embraced by our founders—laws of human nature coming from  God.

Madonna thinks that, since abortions are now legal, the moral law is on her side. But her super mind—speaking in projection code—sees far more deeply. She instructs us on the crucial matter revealing the current legal law violates her own internal moral law.

As Kellyanne Conway said at the pro-life march a week later on January 27, protecting “life” is fundamental to the Constitution. Abortions contradict the internal rule of law, she said. But Madonna consciously disagrees.

Yet, the Material Girl will take us past her denial showing us that very law at work within her deep unconscious super mind. She has two moral compasses—her super mind sees much further. 

As a central spokeswoman, Madonna provided the deepest look ever into the soul of the worldwide women’s movement.The conscious mind sees shallow, the super mind sees deep. Madonna’s super mind not only profiled herself, it also used its symbolic language to reveal precisely what the women’s movement is all about at its core.

Madonna makes a radical confession, a culture-changing confession, asking herself and her sisters-in-protest to accept the unacceptable about themselves. In effect, she’s having a huge argument with herself and with our founders, and she’s telling herself a truth she cannot stand up to consciously but desperately needs to face.

‘Blow up White House’ rage— matches abortion rage

So when she says “I’m angry… I’m outraged… yes, I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House,” her super mind is saying what? Is this a projection? We must decode the symbolic messages.

Tellingly, on the day following her public tirade, Madonna unconsciously underscored the super mind’s way of using language. She’d been speaking only “in metaphor,” she said. Secretly she was instructing listeners to decode her metaphors—her symbolic messages (often projections)—instructing us how to decode her angry comments from the day before. Secretly disclosing how her super mind sees abortion. 

First the White House symbolizes the most special abode in America—painted white, symbolizing purity. A house itself symbolizes a home, a secure container which keeps all intruders out. A house becomes a home which nurtures those living there. In the White House live the symbolic father and mother of America.

Now Madonna wants to blow up the White House. She’s not angry at the house itself, of course, but what it symbolizes and now the person, the president who lives there.

Madonna wants to blow Trump and his supporters into total oblivion. In a profanity-laced oration she repeats, “F**k Trump, F**k Trump!” In her imperfect primitive mind, she’s a murdering terrorist and wishes she could get away with it. She’s living the conscious Hollywood dream of the protestor free to speak her own mind, however, extreme, however crude. “I’m free baby, free!” Except she has a huge problem—her super mind. And so does Hollywood and the women’s movement. She has no idea that the truly great unconscious mind exists, yet it speaks so powerfully. It’s describing herself while severely judging her.

Return to her image—what crucial White House is she talking about? What home of hers is she blowing to smithereens?  What home of women? She’s really talking about the pure house of her sacred womb and its inhabitant—the unborn human being.
Unconsciously she sees straight through the sham that abortion is just a choice, a woman’s right. In “plain” imagery her projection language declares it’s murder and mayhem—blowing little human beings out of existence.

Unknowingly she pleads: “Hear me plain, a human being lives in my sacred womb, my pure nurturing home that contains the most important human being in my world—my baby.”

Isn’t that how every mother feels about her child? Isn’t that even how Madonna feels about her own children, the ones for whom she waged vicious custody battles after her bitter divorce?

Madonna’s super mind testifies that abortion is taking a life and violates everyone’s universal values. She is the poster woman for the super mind’s law of nature “protect life” moral compass indwelling all women.

Unconsciously she declares the pro-life movement is right to protect innocent lives. Decoded, Madonna’s hostile speech stunningly reveals how pro-life her super mind truly is.

She’s vividly exposing the killing fields of the women’s movement. 

Madonna corrects herself—start new revolution of love
The super mind always offers a clear model of correction. The next day, thinking she could take back her violent nature—her desire to blow up the White House—she underscores it with two classic “protests too much” denials, “I’m not violent, I’m not violent.” Again the super mind instructs. Read through her denial imagery to see her confirming confession of how doubly violent she truly is.

But listen to her super mind correction as she insisted when her speech began, “I want to start a revolution of love.” And the next day she declared it had been an honor (the H word) to have been part of an audience chanting “we choose love.” She’s a millimeter away from shouting “choose life.”

Her shadow side—and identifying projections

Madonna referenced her two sides—expressing anger and outrage and then hope and love. Hear her super mind confirmation, “I shared two ways of looking at things.” She’s asking us to see her mind two ways. She speaks two languages—conscious literal language and the super mind language of metaphor.

Consciously she rationalizes her projected anger onto Trump. She has no intention of stopping her assault on the unborn, and—in her desperate attempt to justify herself—she’s still encouraging millions of women to get abortions. Misery loves company, guilt loves fellow destroyers.

But her super mind tells us to hear the symbolic language of her super mind confessing her brutal violence. How do we know she’s projecting her violence and denying it?

First you identify projections with reality—here life and death. A death you can’t undo. Yet she insists her “my right to my body” conscious moral compass says it’s okay—and denies a life exists inside her womb.

Consciously she destroys the unborn, unconsciously her super mind wants the unborn to live. Yet she chooses based on her conscious mind with all its blind spots—certain it sees all, certain no deeper law lives inside her, she’s immune to new revelation from her own super mind.

Madonna confesses she violates her deeper, loving self, and denies that she chooses to destroy. And she can’t take back her destruction. She’s in a terrible bind—blind to her true self and destroying lives. But she offers herself a solution.

Marchers’ projections of abuse—point to abortion guilt

Millions were puzzled as to the protest purpose. In essence, the march centered around abortion. They feared the “pro-life” Trump was going to take away “my rights to my body, my right to choose.” They declared he was abusive and degraded women, seeing them as sex objects. They also demanded equal pay for women. But, thinking it was about women’s rights, they secretly confessed to their deep fear of how badly they were violating their own inner laws.

Decode all the protestors’ various complaints and we see that their images were also metaphors for abortion—confirming Madonna’s secret confession. They too answer to a deeper moral compass. Unknowingly they spoke for the rights of the unborn. Just listen.

The unborn choose life—as every one of them does in the womb– their right to their body. There are no suicides in the womb—they all fight hard to live as neo-natal nurses will tell you.

The unborn should not be abused and degraded. The unborn should not be diminished as unwanted products of irresponsible sex. No, the unborn deserve “equal pay,” equal worth as a person.

Madonna, who has two kids, knows this intuitively. We could call this the “Great Unconscious March for the Unborn,” as guilty mothers confess.

Secretly their unconscious guilt is off the charts. They are furious with themselves. Unconsciously they judge themselves abusive, power hungry, neglectful victimizers who take lives. Judgment oozes from their pores. 

Madonna sees Judgment Day and verdict

Remember, too, at age 58, Madonna’s own physical death is not so distant. Meanwhile, her super mind points toward an ultimate judgment day. Unconsciously she looks to the end of her life, and the end of the women’s movement. Repeatedly dropping F-bombs on opponents of the women’s march, she said, “To our detractors that insist that this march will never add up to anything: F**k you!”

Don’t miss she’s talking future judgment—what her life and the protesters will amount to. Her projection asserts “nothing– but destruction.”

Remember, Madonna took her stage name from her Roman-Catholic background, naming herself after Mary, the original Madonna. Now she’s on the run from the destruction and violence she inflicts secretly on others. On the run from her hidden guilt, she knows her deepest need: grace, the only solution—Jesus taking her sins away.

Her super mind sees her only hope–an ultimate atonement forgiveness, for a scapegoat savior to undo her severe guilt. In her enabling mind for blowing millions of babies up in one abortion bomb after another.

But first she must “choose love” and stop the violence. Read no more legal abortions. Then ask for forgiveness. 

Hidden confession in song ‘Human Nature’

Think about her confession of abortion in her original song “Human Nature”—she’s got it on full display. See how the imagery in her lyrics clearly depicts an abortion as her super mind speaks for the unborn and their human nature all the way back in 1994. And she insisted on singing it at the women’s protest march.

Twice she says “I’m not sorry,” suggesting a denial apology to the unborn.

She’s supposedly looking at a relationship where she couldn’t speak her mind. She couldn’t say the words she desired, was silenced “with bitterness and lies.” The other party didn’t “see life through my eyes”—a poignant read on abortion. She wonders “did I do something wrong, didn’t know I couldn’t speak”—as the unborn would cry out if only he could speak. Then the image of being shoved “in my narrow room away from you” suggesting the grave, as his mother abandons him forever.

Finally Madonna confesses, “I’m breakin’ all the rules I didn’t make” suggesting a confession to her Creator who made the rules of life, the rules she’s breaking.

Self-degradation: “Nothing but p***y”

A consistent feature of the march was the extremes of self-degradation.  Taking some degrading comments Trump made about women referencing “p***y” in 2008, the women protestors magnified it to a power of 200,000, thinking that if they all degraded themselves they were all good. But self-degradation is what it is—self-judgment. Consciously mocking Trump, they mocked themselves.

Wearing their pink “p***y” hats and with oh-so-cool cynical tongues in cheek, they celebrated in a childish show-and-tell the extreme promiscuous sex they so heartily endorse—nowhere more so than from the pulpits of Hollywood and college campuses. That promiscuity that leads to abortion as easy birth control. Easy as pick-up night. 

Madonna and the great disconnect: The vagina and the sacred womb
From Madonna and her friends we witness the great disconnect—the rise and fall of Femininity.
These protesting women have declared their true identity. They have carried out the great disconnect between their vaginas and their wombs.

It’s as though they’re saying, “We’re just vaginas waiting to gratify and self-gratify, just sex objects, not a unique person. We destroy motherhood. We destroy childhood for millions. Carelessly we think we can so easily get another motherhood moment or another child on our timing when we’re ready. After all, we’re in charge.”

This is why the infamous Vagina Monologues are so misleading. The dramatization suggests women have finally come of age in all their vaginal glory. But now that glory comes cheap. Women think life is now a monologue—and indeed it becomes one.

They forget real life is a dialogue. The real vagina dialogue is with a real lover, a soulmate husband who enables the two of them to create a new life, a child with whom they each can dialogue their whole life—and with their children’s children. Life is a dialogue created in a living dialogue with a Creator. That dialogue needs repairing. And their super minds tell us what we need is a new dialogue of forgiveness, serious atonement forgiveness.

This article ran on Freedomoutpost.com on 2/15/17.

The post Madonna’s Secret Protest: the great disconnect—the vagina and the sacred womb appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

Arpaio noted that the fraud was a major violation of federal law—regardless of where Obama was born—and sent his findings to Congress. Predictably his conclusions were ignored by the mainstream media.

But Obama has been confessing unconsciously to his illegal presidency for some time in exactly the way Jesus and cutting-edge psychoanalysis reveals—in one “log in his eye” projection after another. Remember the new understanding of the human mind. A person’s subconscious, far more astute than we ever realized, quick-reads himself in the blink of an eye. So we listen to Obama’s projections which are both his quick-read take on himself and a model of correction.

This monumental paradigm shift in psychology allows us to understand unconscious communication and the human mind’s startling super-intel awareness of conflicts and resolution. This new knowledge about the human mind allows us to fully grasp a man’s meaning.

Understand the new science of unconscious communication provides the exclusive hard evidence—apart from circumstantial evidence (fraudulent birth certificate, refusal to release any records, etc.)—that Obama is an illegal president. His unconscious super-intel mind has specifically confessed in its unique language.

Projection confessions

Looking back at Obama’s recent comments, we find distinct projection confessions. While in Germany on November 17 he spoke about false news (a projection in itself) and how to determine the truth.

Obama declared, “In an age of so much misinformation—packaged very well…if we’re not serious about facts, about what’s true and what’s not, if we can’t discriminate between serious arguments and propaganda then we have problems.”

In other words, he has disseminated misinformation about the legality of his smoothly packaged presidency, lied about the facts and propagandized America from the beginning of his candidacy.

Obama’s super-intel reports exactly where his deceit led. If we don’t discriminate between the truth and a lie and spot the propaganda, “we won’t know what to protect. We won’t know what to fight for.”

When the media, the Congress and the courts—all the way to the Supreme Court— submitted to Obama’s propaganda, together they carried out the biggest birth conspiracy of all: accepting his U.S. birth and Hawaiian birth certificate as true facts.

Indeed, they didn’t know what to protect or what to fight for—our very foundation, the rule of law. That’s how close we are to losing America. No wonder Congress can’t face Arpaio’s findings.

Obama’s super-intel warns us, “We can lose so much of what we’ve gained in terms of democratic freedoms…prosperity we come to take for granted.” He’s hinting that we can lose our democracy. We can take our prosperity for granted as great nations invariably do before they fall from within.

We return to Obama’s admonition to get the facts—precisely what Sheriff Arpaio has just provided. Facts are determined by reality, and our leaders have consistently ignored the reality of Obama’s phony birth certificate.

Here is where the breakthrough to the magnificent super-intel comes into play. Projections identify accurate unconscious facts someone wants to hide. The bottom line is that our brilliant super-intel picks up on the facts. It’s vastly superior to our conscious minds which remain prone to blind spots.

Imagery of illegality
Unconsciously Obama’s consistent projection imagery presents the deeper fact of his illegal presidency almost daily. In Obama’s extensive interview with Rolling Stone magazine one day after the election, he said the way to bring the country together in the face of false news “is how we create a common set of facts.” Note the repetitive projection that he has created “fake news” about his presidency, but he points again to the answer—get the facts.

In the interview, he specifically points to his illegal presidency, and he spontaneously links Trump’s surprising election to his own election.

Early on election night in 2008 his key advisors told him, “We don’t think we’re gonna win this thing.” Read his super-intel imagery; he didn’t think he should have won the election and didn’t really win because he had been ineligible to run.

Confirming his hidden confession, Obama then told how he would advise Trump, “Number 1, however you campaigned, once you’re in this office, you are part of a legacy dating back to those first Revolutionaries. And this amazing experiment in democracy has to be tended.”

It’s another projection confession. Obama campaigned as the first revolutionary illegitimate president and took office as such. He failed to tend to—protect—America’s amazing democracy. Instead he experimented with it, breaking the rule of law, our nation’s very foundation—and got away with it.

Don’t overlook his continued unconscious instructions to Trump: tend to democracy by enforcing the rule of law. Unknowingly Obama continues to instruct Trump to investigate his illegal presidency. As demonstrated in my recent book, The Stockholm Syndrome President: How Trump Triggered Obama’s Hidden Confession, Obama intuitively pleaded with Trump to hold him accountable and free him from his secret control by radical Islam. This led to Obama’s illegal candidacy and attack on America. Now Trump has new factual evidence: Arpaio’s proof of a forged Obama birth certificate.

Immigrant president

In the Rolling Stone interview, Obama makes a familiar reference to immigrants secretly referring to himself. The 2016 election results showed that “Democratic immigration-rights activists failed to realize borders mean something to the majority of Americans,” he said. His super-intel is saying he was an immigration-rights activist about his illegal presidency entitled to make up his own rules and assault millions of Americans who knew that without borders we have no country. His super-intel functions as a “rule of law” activist correcting him and confessing to his great misdeed.

His denial confession reveals his contradictory thinking. He insists that “the rule of law and values that stay true to our (his) immigrant roots…don’t have to be contradictory.” Notice Obama’s illogical thinking—he can both break the law and keep it at the same time as his key imagery declares, “I am an immigrant rooted in an illegal presidency.”

This matches his earlier comment that fake news created a “dust cloud of nonsense”—a perfect description of his fake presidency.

Ban illegal presidency
In rich projection imagery he then tells of people on Facebook “passing crazy stuff about [how he] has banned the Pledge of Allegiance.” Again secretly he admits that he behaved in a crazy way running as an illegal president and totally destroyed his allegiance to America. He reveals how distorted—“crazy”—his conscious thinking is so that it allows him to severely violate the law and it means nothing. His reference to the “Pledge” points to the oath of office he specifically violated on his Inauguration Day in 2009. He knows his presidency should be banned. He should still be impeached.

In the end Obama’s super-intel provides the antidote to his misleading of America with his illegitimate election. The answer—come back to the facts.

The interview took place in the Oval Office. Obama commented, “Sitting behind that desk is sobering…it will have an impact on him [Trump] as it has on every president.” Obama soberly and solemnly acknowledges his true legacy as America’s only illegal president. He cannot live with himself without telling the truth subliminally.

Informed citizens only hope to constrain Obama

His super-intel reveals the stunning solution now, “I think the most important constraint on any president is the American people themselves, of an informed citizenry that is active and participating and engaged.” It’s as though he’s advising, “American citizens—of which I am not one—get the facts about my horrendous illegal presidency. Hear my super-intel telling you that secret fact again and then constrain me. Match it with the circumstantial facts of my suppression of my records. Match it with my forged birth certificate—now an undeniable fact.

Even our conservative leaders can suffer Beltway blindness. One leader—an outsider—saw it. Donald Trump was certain Obama was an illegal citizen. Can he now return to that belief for America’s sake? Obama himself tells us how important it is that he be brought to justice—America’s rule of law restored to its rightful place. Obama’s super-intel speaks not only for himself but for all America—to fight for and protect our nation.
Arpaio has done his part, now it’s up to the citizens.

Obama’s encouraging Americans to become informed and then take action. Constrain him by urging—insisting—their congressional representatives restore the rule of law. Deep down Obama knows he should be impeached—it’s the only way for justice to be satisfied.

Because of that unconscious fact he promises “that is going to be something that I will, in my own modest ways, continue to try to encourage for the rest of my life.” Obama will continue to confess subliminally. His inner God-given moral compass demands it.

This article ran on Freedomoutpost.com on 12/30/16

The post Obama Validates Arpaio Report: Confesses to Illegal Presidency appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

How do you think Barack Obama answered?

Millions of Americans had voted with their heart and soul praying to be delivered from Obama’s disastrous administration. As much as they disliked Hillary Clinton, this pro-Trump turnout was motivated more by Obama than by Hillary. The word on the street and in the conservative press was “Please, dear God, no Obama third term.”

Of course, since his narcissistic personality had suffered an unmistakably negative referendum, Obama would certainly engage in denial.

For Obama it was a time for a deeper super intelligence, soul-searching moment of true confession of his deepest, darkest secret—if you know how to decode projections, you will hear it. Simply take the topic he’s talking about and apply it to him.

To truly understand the often-irrational mind of Barack Obama—to put it clinically– we must grasp that Obama possesses an unconscious super intelligence that quick-reads him instantaneously and projects in specific imagery his huge flaws—proverbial logs in his eye—onto others.

But the projection also represents great wisdom and a model of correction if applied to himself (his super-intel’s goal). This monumental paradigm shift in psychology allows us to understand unconscious communication and the human mind’s startling super-intel awareness of conflicts and ideal resolution.

This new knowledge about the human mind allows us to fully grasp a man’s meaning.

And voters also possess an unconscious super-intel that secretly reads Obama’s projections and his contradictory behavior. This is the reason why people often say trust the voters—because voters pick up on the deeper truth, with exceptions such as the 2008 and 2012 elections.

Those exceptions were the result of the mistaken notion that America had to anoint its ‘first black president” to prove its national self-righteousness.

Back to the great question for Obama—“was the loss to Trump a referendum on you, sir?” Without the slightest hesitation in his Washington Post interview Obama descended into massive denial and then delivered a treatise on unconscious awareness and projection of exactly who he is. Listen up.

Illegal presidency imagery
In projection code—talking of Republicans but really of himself—he reveals in key imagery he’s an illegal president. He continues to admit how devastating that has been for the United States. Unconsciously he offers this as a central explanation why the Democrats lost the election. Secretly he sees that the people knew.

He strings together repeated imagery symbolic of his illegal presidency, together forming the thoughtprint pattern that confirms his unconscious symbology—the encoded central message.

First he warns that Republicans must “guard against a crude nationalism” taking root in the U.S. Think of it this way: as an illegal president Obama crudely claimed American citizenship outside the rule of law. Indeed, over the course of his administration he has continually violated one law after another.

He warns Republicans to guard against an exclusive “ethnic identity,” pointing to his exclusive role as “first black president” which allowed him to escape any vetting of his illegal presidency. Anyone who questioned his citizenship was immediately labeled racist. The media followed in lockstep labeling those who wanted him vetted as wacky birther conspiricists.

Obama further warned Republicans of “tribalism built around us and them,” again alluding to his tribal Kenyan birth. He divided the country into “us and them,” his supporters versus those who questioned his legality.

No discussion of an illegal presidency was allowed. It was “don’t question me” or “you’re involved in the birther conspiracy.” Could he really get away with hiding his complete records all the way to the White House? Indeed he did, before finally producing a phony birth certificate in 2011 as determined by Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse in Arizona’s Maricopa County. Of course the media ignored the finding.

Arpaio’s team has a new report due to be released on December 15 which should further substantiate Obama’s federal law violation with crucial new information. Of course the media will ignore the findings—ever the Obama legacy makers.

‘Mismatch’ indeed

Obama continues projecting. He said there was a “mismatch” between his 56 percent approval rating before the election and the Democrats losing the White House. He insisted, “people think I did a pretty good job.” Except he forgot about the far larger unconscious mind of voters and his own. First he confesses that, as an illegal president, he was a “mismatch” for the presidency.

He fails to understand that approval polls are conscious votes, but in a highly charged politically correct racial environment many will speak politely of him but vote differently. The groundswell for Trump reflected just how passionately people opposed Obama. Millions of Americans are understandably incensed at his treatment of them and their beloved country.

Deep down Obama’s super-intel sees that the people picked up on his great secret, his unconstitutional presidency. He explains how this was a major underlying factor in Trump’s election.

Obama recognized a common theme in populist movements her and in Europe—specifically referring to his illegal presidency. He declared that people had been disrupted “in very concrete ways” by “globalization.” In other words, his illegal global presidency resulted after he came to us secretly as a citizen from another part of the globe. No wonder he often showed more interest in other countries than America. That was a very concrete way of being a “global” president.

Obama’s super-intel imagery clarifies how citizens saw through his illegitimate presidency—either consciously or unconsciously. He sets up his punch line—the clearest image of his illegal presidency—when he commented, “psychologically people are less certain of their [his] national identities or their [his] place in the world. It starts looking different and disorienting.”

In other words, people caught on psychologically to his foreign national identity and his lack of place in America. Increasingly his decisions looked different—un-American. His illegal presidency was disorienting to citizens who had never seen anything like it.

Many Americans consciously realized he was an illegal president, but many others picked up on it in their intuitive far-seeing subconscious.

In another interview on December 8 with CNN’s Fareed Zakaria, Obama again confessed unconsciously that his presidency was illegal. He overtly mentioned the subject in a classic “thou protests too much” denial confession. He blamed opposition to his presidency on racism by prejudiced birthers—again linking it to Trump’s election. It’s as though he’s saying, “I must incessantly mention that I’m not an illegal president to secretly confess I am one. I cannot let the subject go—continually projecting my blame onto birthers. Secretly I know voters spotted this admission.”

The gospel of distorted thinking
Why is it crucial to grasp Obama’s subconscious confessions of his illegal presidency now? His guilt is fueling his distorted thinking as he tries to achieve his legacy goal of reshaping the opinion of millions of citizens.

Secretly he has every intention of carrying out an intellectual bloodbath, disorienting the people’s thinking—persuading from within, Alinsky-style—to embrace virtual lawlessness by calling it normal.

Convinced they are entitled to make up their own laws, millions have already  swallowed the mind-altering Kool-Aid. Everything goes, whatever I say is right, and if people learn to group-think like this—we will conquer the world as we destroy it and ourselves.

In another projection Obama confesses precisely how he gains a following by enabling others to violate the rule of law and in turn support his illegal presidency and irrational thinking. He notes how Republicans “dangerously discriminate” against minority groups and “prevent blacks, Latinos, or gays or women from participating in rebuilding America.”

But secretly he’s talking about himself, how he creates various groups of minority victims to discriminate against law-abiding citizens to divide the country.

In The Washington Post interview he continued to attack our culture, insisting conservatives lack character and values. He implemented his new moral compass with familiar propaganda buzz words such as fair, inclusive, non-discriminatory and uniting. But secretly he’s divisive, subverting the truth, subverting natural law.

The truth is whatever Obama wants to make it—because deep down like all rule violators he fears accountability to The One to whom our deeper moral compass points. But his all-seeing super-intel possesses a God-given natural law moral compass that compels him to tell the truth. Making up his own rules unknowingly violates his very essence.

Obama is not done doing his damage.

Obama’s the great divider because he himself has been deeply divided since birth. During his horrific childhood he was programmed to assault America as an unconscious Stockholm Syndrome victim to radical Islam. (See my book, The Stockholm Syndrome President: How Trump Triggered Obama’s Hidden Confession.) He truly remains a secret prisoner to destruction. Deep down he subconsciously confesses because he wants to be freed. Yet his shadow side continues to self-destruct.

This article ran on Freedomoutpost.com on 12/14/16

The post Obama Confesses Illegal Presidency Cost Dems Election appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

But there’s a deeper commentary on Harry Reid derived from his very own unconscious super intelligence (which we all possess) that reads him like a book. His super-intel reads his secret blind spots and confesses his true motivations.

This infinitely deeper intelligence tells the truth about himself in code between the lines. His super intel communicates in a language of projection, denial and symbolic imagery. Read past his literal statements about Trump and think of it as though he’s speaking figuratively, symbolically about himself. Exactly as Jesus famously warned that the fault a man finds in his neighbor (in this case, Trump) may well be the log in his own eye.

Such is the case here. Reid accurately reads who he is and confesses in his projections—which match his behavior. He’s actually the one instigating hate and bigotry.

His super-intel not only provides the most accurate take on Harry Reid, it also calls on him to correct his behavior. He teaches the world about his guilt and how it leads to his self-destructive behavior. America can then see the warning his confession presents and understand clearly what we must battle. Unknowingly Reid’s asking to be stopped for the good of America. He represents the far-left radical Democrats who have no intention of abating their unconscious sabotage of America.

Learn how to hear the unconscious language of projection and you will understand politics much more clearly. In that light we listen to Harry Reid’s super-intel communicating his true and deeper read on Donald Trump’s election as president.

Decoding Reid’s deeper message

Immediately after Trump’s election, Harry Reid immediately berated the president-elect, characterizing him as a “sexual predator who lost the popular vote and fueled his campaign with bigotry and hate.”

Step back and you will see that in one projection after another Reid is secretly reading himself. These are his own words telling us who he sees himself to be, deep down.

Consider the projection. The Democrats actually lost the vote that counts the most in the U.S. Electoral College. The Constitution put the Electoral College in place to assure that a candidate is popular across the entire country to prevent a few massive population centers such as New York City, California and Chicago from ruling the nation. Citizens outside these areas are not just “flyover country,” as Reid arrogantly implied. His comments reflect that he considers himself outside the rule of law.

Trump won 32 out of 50 states including Utah, where Reid attended college. Now consider Reid’s unconscious projection that that he’s a hateful predator violating constitutional law as he attacks a majority of voters in 32 states.

Reid is a divisive force bigoted against anyone who disagrees with him. In 2012 he overtly lied about Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney accusing him of tax evasion. As senate majority leader, Reid never crossed the aisle. Instead he continually obstructed Republican amendments from coming to a vote, and implemented a “nuclear option” (51 votes instead of 60) to push his agenda.

The Nevada senator commented on “watching white nationalists celebrate while innocent Americans cry tears of fear….”  At this moment his projection confession declares he’s the abusive white nationalistic democrat behaving like the Nazis (National Socialist Democratic Party), demanding the nation he wants apart from the election process. Reid supported the abusive policies of Barack Obama which left millions of innocent Americans in deep grief over the administration’s policies which were destroying the America they knew. These wounded Americans were the ones who elected Trump.

Unconsciously Reid sees that he is an anti-American senator helping carry out the attack on our nation. Deep down he’s also fearful over his unconscious guilt which announces a truth he can’t face.

In one brutal projection after another Reid continues his subconscious self-assessment of himself insisting that the media has normalized Trump who threatens “to tear families apart…and has directed crowds of thousands to intimidate reporters and assault African-Americans.” Secretly Reid sees himself as the one who continues tearing the American family apart, rationalizing his behavior as normal. He enables the protests of thousands around the country hoping to intimidate reporters into discounting Trump’s election. At the same time he assaults African-American protestors teaching them to attack the election process.

In classic omnipotent denial, Reid assures the Trump protestors’ “their fear is entirely rational” implying how his Democratic Party strategy was manipulating voters, controlling them by instilling irrational fear. His projection is clear: millions of rational Americans feared Reid’s attacks— voting for Trump to prevent them. Reid confesses his irrational disturbed attacks on the rule of law.

He further confesses who he is as he sees that Trump “may not possess the capacity to assuage the fears [of protestors].” The relentlessly brutal Reid knows he’s a fear-monger who continually fuels fear in America.

Yet his super-intel voice of wisdom presents to him a model of correction—how he ought to behave—encouraging him to see past his blind spot and help protestors see past their own irrationality for their own good and the country’s, finally settling into the rule of law.  But first Reid must acknowledge his unconscious super-intel that reads his blind spots—that his conscious mind is limited and often selfish, here attacking Trump beyond the pale. That would require self-awareness and introspection, possibly therapy to discover why he’s so vindictive. Obviously he prefers to attack rather than face his own pain and deficiencies.

So Reid continues his subconscious self-indictment with more word pictures in his gallery of hateful images insisting “the Electoral College does not absolve Trump of the grave sins he committed against millions of Americans.” The Nevada Democrat consumed by blind spots secretly confesses his attack on the fair election process and the Electoral College. Deep down he’s consumed by guilt reflected in his own words “the grave sins he continues to commit against millions of Americans”—who had a voice because of the Electoral College. Wisely the founders put it in place to prevent abusive demagogues like Reid from amassing complete national power by mobilizing a few large population areas. Reid secretly knows he’s a “grave sinner.”

Reid continues consciously talking about Trump, unconsciously talking about himself,
“If Trump [Reid] wants to roll back the tide of hate he unleashed, he has a tremendous amount of work to do and he must begin immediately.” In his heart of hearts—read his super-intel—Reid knows the unbridled hate he continually sets loose in America. His super-intel again offers him a model action: ‘There’s a lot of repenting to do, Harry, and do it now before it’s too late—cut out the hate.’

But severely guilty people routinely demonstrate a fatal error. Once they begin down the road of attacking others they invariably self-sabotage. In the end, they are nothing but destroyers who want to take everyone with them—even a nation full of people—as they slide toward self-destruction.

Reid is not alone in his unconscious projection take on himself and his party. In my recent book, The Stockholm Syndrome President, How Trump Triggered Obama’s Hidden Confession, I described how journalist Paul Krugman of the New York Times, a staunch Democrat, demonstrated a similar projection. In his March 14, 2016 editorial (“Trump is no accident”) Krugman projected his accurate unconscious read of the Democrat Party (and Reid) onto the Republicans and Trump.

To decode the projection Krugman saw that the Democrat Party has been taken over in recent years by a violent faction culminating in the dictatorial abuse of the nation by Obama and Beltway insiders such as Reid. Krugman called for purging the party and unconsciously made plain that Obama was an illegal citizen which could be proven by a forensic examination of his birth certificate. He urged such actions to restore the rule of law.

In this light, we can thank God for Harry Reid and his hidden confessions—guided by his super-intel, the internal truth-teller. We must see the significance of his unconscious confession of who he is (along with too many Democrats): irrational, a bigot ruled by hatred, outside the rule of law, who continually commits grave sins against America as he unconsciously tries to bury our nation.

As a result, we must continue waging a battle for America. Trump and the Republicans have their work cut out for them. They could start as our founders did and ask for God’s grace in overcoming their sinful enemy.

Many Christians believe it was a miracle that Trump won. Only the continued grace of God can defeat someone as determined to destroy America as Reid—self-righteously blind to what he’s doing. Surely we can pray for Reid’s healing but at the same time we must fight to stop Reid and radicals like him. We must battle on two fronts—spiritual and the body politic—confronting those who would divide us like Reid, the secret pillager who deep down knows exactly who he is.

This article ran on Freedomoutpost.com on 11/29/16

The post Decoding Democrat attacks: Predator Harry Reid confesses his attack on Trump and nation, Freedom Outpost appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

As a psychiatrist I specialize in forensic profiling and in addition the psychology of success. I work with people from all walks of life including highly successful business people and athletes who learn that navigating the waters of success can be far trickier than they had ever imagined.

You would think that by now Donald Trump has success mastered. Nothing could be further from the truth. He is now in a whole new ballgame attempting almost the impossible—to move from unbelievable success as a builder to becoming a successful politician and president of the United States in 16 months. He’s like a highly tuned world-class golfer who suddenly decides he’s going to become a classical violinist.  Nobody in modern political history has ever attempted what he has and come close to pulling it off.

Secretly he’s showing classic signs of success blindspots we can call retreats from success. He’s violating classic principles of success.

Amidst his surprising political success his self-defeating behavior puzzles many. It shouldn’t if we understood the unconscious pressure on him. In summary he show numerous sigs of limiting his success: his numerous overaggressive tweets, unnecessarily alienating Republicans who don’t support him, calling people names too often and especially defending himself when he’s attacked to the point he’s distracted. All this prevents him from playing to his significant strengths.

Trump recently in an interview with Rush Limbaugh at the end of October admitted to a cardinal sin—ignoring his advisors and political wisdom. He explained he wasn’t narcissistic but had to respond to attacks on him or his family instead of message discipline his advisors counselled. He’s demonstrating a conscious rationalization but his unconscious super-intelligence which reads him far better deep down— seeing through his unconscious denial— confessed he was retreating from his best.

(We have discovered an unconscious super-intel that reads us deep down in the blink of an eye and tries to help us past blindspots by communicating in key “thou protests too much” denials and key “log in my neighbors eye” projections along with other important ideas.)

First Trump was confessing his success blindspot to Limbaugh in essence by saying “my advisors don’t understand what I must do.” He thinks he must do what his conscious mind thinks best but unconsciously he’s confessing the log in his eye in a classic projection:  he doesn’t understand. His inner secret advisor and super-intel is telling him this.  He’s violating a fundamental rule of success not staying disciplined and on message (i.e. confront Hillary relentlessly and stay away from unimportant personal matters– you have limited time in this game. The clock is running out.)

He demonstrated another unconscious super-intel confession of success blindness as his campaign manager Kellyanne Conway told New York Magazine on October 29, 2016.  She confronted him with the magnitude of the election and the tremendous expectations of his supporters after he said, “I think we’ll win, and if not, that’s okay too.” Conway got angry telling him how much people believed in him, to look at his rallies—and he spent more on his dry cleaning bill than most supporters made.  But read through Trump’s retreat, “I’m okay with losing. I’m thinking of not winning.” A partial retreat for sure but a crucial one.

Looking back Conway missed a key stress of success—Trump’s wealth. He had had “more success than the law allows.” Deep down successful people can see it like that and out of an unconscious need to share they can back off and let someone else be successful.

Trump has demonstrated another subconscious reason for a success blindspot—the relentless attacks when you’re on top especially in a presidential election get old.

Trump has recently commented that in the past he’s normally had positive press and could handle negative press also, but he had never experienced such brutal personal attacks. As Vince Lombardi famously said, “tiredness can make cowards of us all”, meaning we can let up at key moments. And personal attacks make you more tired than you know. Trump has incredible fortitude but he’s a human being with limitations.

One other unique almost overpowering stress to him is that he’s in a new game for the first time. Ballplayers talk about how much they learn from the first game in a season to the second. Sometimes losing that first game reminds you how much you hate losing, or how hard it was to win and you could have put out more effort. Invariably people new to a particular arena can do better with experience, the great teacher. Later Trump will look back at things he could have done better but if he appreciated the success pressure on him now he could take a step further. Maybe it would be the difference in the election in a very close contest.

That’s where coaches and advisors come in. They see your blindspots because they’ve seen them before in the battle with other candidates and they can spot a weakness, a subconscious retreat such as: not playing to your strengths.  Good coaches can see further that players. Trump should know that as a CEO that he sees the goal better than his team. But new game, new day, and the tendency is to keep playing the familiar game of ‘I’m the coach’ instead of ‘I’m the player.’

These are just a few of the pressures of success. Surely history teaches us very successful people can have a problem handling success. Look at previous presidents: Richard Nixon did the stupid thing of covering up an insignificant Republican break-in to Democratic headquarters. Lying about it instead of apologizing he lost his presidency. George Bush the elder helped cost himself the 1992 presidency when he went back on his “read my lips I won’t raise taxes” policy.

So what can Trump do about it? Awareness, awareness, awareness. He doesn’t have time for in-depth success psychotherapy but sometimes just a new awareness of the real issue can make a difference.

The great Donald Trump has to learn that sometimes you stay great by listening because you are a limited human being. Sometime less is more: listen to the coach and play to your strengths. Don’t be a rookie and try to do too much.

And somebody please tell him about the unconscious retreat from success. Of course he’s trying hard to win but the little things can make a difference. Grasping success pressure can be one of those.

Trump politically has demonstrated he’s a good closer. Often counted out after crucial mistakes he has proved the political pundits wrong with one comeback after another.

Now he’s been presented a crucial gift as the panel of political experts (LeBoutillier, Cadell and Schoen) on Fox News “Political Insiders” show informed him on October 30^th.  With the new FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton’s emails being reopened, a Hillary Clinton presidency could throw the country into a constitutional crisis. Would Obama pardon her? Would she pardon herself? And all the while Hillary remains subject to an indictment regarding the Clinton Foundation and her misuse of it for monetary gain.

The astute panel of two Democrats and one Republican saw that Trump alone can make the case to the nation that such a Clinton presidency would throw the nation into turmoil no one can imagine. That Trump must present himself as a reasonable presidential alternative who can prevent this chaos giving the people a clear cut choice: peace or turmoil and how he would work with both sides of the aisle to steer America’s ship.

LeBoutillier, the Republican, recommended Trump with his wealth buy thirty minutes of time on national television and address the nation with a healing message to prevent the havoc. He insisted Trump can best make that case of the clear cut difference for the American people. Such a move would be bold and if Trump could also confine himself to message discipline this could swing the election.

Truly Trump could be a good closer if he played to his strength and in this case take his very best shot.

The post Donald Trump must overcome success blindspot appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

To quote—from Beck’s Facebook post, ““I Am Neither Endorsing Nor Voting for Hillary Clinton. It is not acceptable to ask a moral, dignified man to cast his vote to help elect an immoral man who is absent decency or dignity. If the consequence of standing against Trump and for principles is indeed the election of Hillary Clinton, so be it. At least it is a moral, ethical choice.”

Before long, Beck issued a denial that he would support Clinton.

Yet his condemnation of Trump at this key moment during which the entire world seems to be attacking Trump was simply a pile-on. Read through his denial which in spirit effectively announces, “I am endorsing and voting for Hillary Clinton.”

Unconsciously Beck is betraying himself and America. His unconscious mind—the newly discovered super intelligence—sees far past his conscious blind spots. His super-intel is quick-reading him in the blink of an eye and telling us what it sees via Beck’s quick-speaking in the language of denial and projection.

He demonstrates precisely how this unconscious works—exactly as Jesus demonstrated.

That’s right, none other than Jesus Christ declared there is a deeper moral compass within each person that sees the complete unadulterated truth beyond that seen by our conscious minds. Recall his teaching (to paraphrase), “Be careful about the fault you see in your neighbor because you could be very likely talking about yourself.”

In essence Jesus was talking about projection, saying, you can lie and not know it, but to operate on truth look at what you deny about yourself and see in others. Then look at what faults you see in your neighbor and seriously consider they are more yours than theirs. Especially when you’re looking at a hot button issue with the deeper moral law on the table.

Above all Jesus warned about pride, self-righteousness that refuses to see the truth about oneself. He uses a sexual metaphor that a prostitute seeking mercy was often closer to God, closer to the truth than a self-righteous churchgoer. Centuries ago, Jesus accurately described cutting-edge knowledge in psychology—a true paradigm shift.

We all have a deeper natural law moral compass, the “constitution” of the deeper mind, that operates on fixed laws of human nature embedded by God. It’s just as America’s founders told us. This leads to the most crucial issue of this election: do laws come from God (constitutionalists’ view) or from man (progressives’ view).

Decoding Beck’s per Jesus’ method

Now apply Beck’s denial that he’s neither endorsing nor voting for Hillary, not throwing the election to her. To translate his super-intel language of denial, he is in fact voting for the Democrat. In a two-candidate election, to deny Trump a vote—encouraging millions to follow suit—is to vote for Hillary Clinton. This basic logic consciously escapes Beck.

So who is Hillary Clinton–especially in terms of natural law?

Who Is Hillary Clinton?

Let’s start with religion—the basis of our rule of law.  As far a religion goes, she has just demeaned conservative Christians—Catholics and evangelicals—through her surrogates such as Communications Director Jennifer Palmier and supporter John Halpin. Hillary declares that these Christians “don’t understand Christian democracy” and are naive about the central issues to America now—including gender politics.

Conservative Christians, however, operate on a natural law moral compass, the same one our founders did. They are the “Christian democracy.” But now Clinton reinterprets everything in terms of “make up your own rules,” which includes speaking for God—what is and isn’t Christian. Secretly she wants to be God.

Natural law is about the inalienable rights: the protection of life, liberty and the free pursuit of happiness.

But Hillary Clinton is all about diversity and controlling the new morality insisting that laws come from man. In other words, she wants to take our moral compass downward. She makes up her own laws and intends to continue this “progressive” agenda. God’s laws are designed to protect life and liberty while the destructive Democrat agenda allows man to make up his own laws, to decide which ones to obey, which ones to flaunt.

In Hillary Clinton’s world, man gets to redefine Christianity. It’s all about diversity. Christianity is Islam is Hinduism. Christ is Muhammad is Buddha.

Nobody judges anybody, nobody has an identity. We’re all falsely one as we drift into the insanity of life with no boundaries. Open borders, no country, all students are the same, all citizens are to earn the same, no one’s special, we’re a team of mediocrity. Nobody gets awards over others, no one earns high salaries except the leaders. No one gets to keep their hard-earned money, they must share it.  The state is your identity and your God—we tell you who you are and what to do.

Has Donald Trump ever fully advocated such? No, but Barack Obama has, and Hillary Clinton will assuredly continue down that same path.

Obama has not protected life in America nor abroad—life in the streets, life in the inner city, life among police. His national security policy shows he has failed to preserve lives in Iraq or the Middle East. As a result, he gave ISIS its start and let their murderous rage continue while arming Iran and threatening the entire world.

Ours is a culture in crisis, and Hillary will continue the crisis.

Unconsciously Beck seems to know this as indicated in his denial confession, “If she is elected, the world does not end.” In other words, read through his denial: her presidency will be as catastrophic as Obama’s.

For the record Beck unknowingly enabled the Obama presidency. He refused to examine the rule of law question—did Obama legally qualify for the presidency. He enabled the mainstream media to label as a racist anyone with serious rule of law questions about Obama. In fact, Obama could have been stopped at the pass if we had seriously studied the issue. (See my research in my 2012 book, The Obama Confession.)

On the other hand, Trump was the only public figure who stood strongly on that issue, stating that Obama had not proven he was a legal candidate—and importantly had not behaved like one violating laws as he desired.

A final look at natural law. Glenn Beck unconsciously violates our moral compass as he enables the corrupt Hillary Clinton to become president. The stakes include the Supreme Court, the Iran nuclear deal, the faltering economy and our very existence.

And over here is Donald Trump—flawed, limited, but overall espousing our founders’ rule of law—that he operated on by and large in his successful business career. Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, was in danger of going to jail as a high profile 30-year government official on the dole playing her high stakes global power game with house money. To numerous nations she implied that if they sent her money she would favor them—national security be damned. She’s a globalist who believes in open borders. To keep her email correspondence secret, she used a private server and greatly risked America’s security. For that she could and should have gone to jail.

Beck’s projection

So when Beck declares he cannot support Trump who is arrogant, immoral, lies, lacks dignity and is a demagogue we must do what? At least consider a projection. Under present circumstances, Glenn Beck is guiltier of the things he accuses Trump of than Trump himself.

Beck may have judged Trump somewhat correctly for his sexual foibles, but he did so at the cost of America’s future. He did so at the risk of jeopardizing the restoration of our deeper moral compass.

He has been joined by some in the self-righteous Republican establishment including members of Congress and pastors, many of whom allowed Obama to violate our moral compass for eight years.

Beck and his boys are the ones who’ve rejected America’s rule of law far more than Donald Trump. They are destroying our future, blaming Trump while consciously thinking that they are saving America.

God help us because these blind folks can’t know. As Beck said, “Sometimes I don’t calculate and destroy my own success.” You’re describing the log in your eye, Glenn. Go learn from Jesus about your deeper moral conscience.

For the record Beck’s own Mormon newspaper, The Deseret News in Salt Lake City whose mission is “to be a leading news brand for faith and family-oriented audiences,” commented on Trump’s lewd comments. It revealed the identical blind spot: strongly declaring no support for the immoral Trump but denying the newspaper supported Hillary. Its editors opined to see their comment as “an endorsement of…Hillary Clinton. That is not the case.”  While praising her “extraordinary experience,” they asserted in one more denial that if she won, “we trust she will recognize that is not a mandate for her specific platform.”

Good luck. More naiveté and self-righteousness will eventually destroy America. We’d better understand how deeply our moral compass sees, how clearly our founders advised us to maintain it. To see when we secretly possess the devilish log in our eye.

The post Glenn Beck and the self-righteous betray founders’ moral compass appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

Symbolically, the Democrats take aim at a presidential candidate’s unacceptable sexuality. Immediately, we have a significant disguised projection. Remember Bill Clinton and Hillary Rodham Clinton, who enabled her husband’s presidency from the beginning by covering up his repetitively aggressive sexual behavior. Bill Clinton’s sexual misconduct, including rape and sex in the Oval Office, was far more offensive than Trump’s. Surely Clinton could talk his promiscuous walk privately with his buddies. Just imagine his stories.

Where was Chaffetz’s public condemnation of Hillary Clinton who not only enabled Bill Clinton’s sexual behavior but publicly and privately belittled his victims? That is the same Hillary Clinton who defended a guilty rapist of a 12-year-old girl and bragged about it when she got him off on legal technicalities.

Let’s not forget about our presidential history of marital infidelity with Dwight Eisenhower keeping a mistress for years and sacred Democratic icons such as Lyndon Johnson and Jack Kennedy (who was Bill Clinton’s personal role model), both serial adulterers. Countless cavorting has gone on behind the presidential scenes in Washington, D.C.

Chaffetz’s denial that Trump-type language is not heard in locker rooms is naïve. Making crude remarks about women and lewdly celebrating sexual adventurism is alive and well in male-only spaces.

For elite athletes it extends to team rides on airplanes with married players bringing along their secret lovers and, in the old days, train rides with overt sexual acting out in front of others in alcoves. I’ve interviewed too many players from professional and college sports, spent a season in a collegiate locker room myself and served in the military, all of which opened my eyes to the real sexual world around us.

Trump was speaking symbolically of “locker room talk” wherever “locker rooms” exist – from construction workers on a lunch break to wealthy executives chatting up their buddies on the golf course to soldiers in training on bivouacs to doctors in their private hospital dining rooms to college dorms and fraternity and sorority houses.

Then we have many so-called “progressives,” a make-up-your-own morals crowd that has enabled a generation of compulsive promiscuity, the mainstreaming of pornography, a rise in sexually transmitted diseases and Hollywood’s pervasive sexual addiction increasingly preaching the gospel of unbridled sexuality.

Why should Americans worry primarily about the, yes, disgusting pseudo-masculine sexuality Trump exhibited in the past when Hillary Clinton is responsible for the Benghazi massacre of Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and other brave Americans, and she even lied about the cause of the rioting that killed them? In addition, she contributed to thousands of deaths in the Middle East and the homelessness of millions. She risked America’s national security with her exposed private email server.

When “speak with forked tongue” Hillary now secretly confesses she embraces open borders, free trade and wants to take American citizens’ guns away by executive order, we indeed fall for the classic Democratic strategy of “distract and conquer.”

Providence has plans for America

Donald Trump’s egregious sexual insults and escapades aside, we have left one major factor unaccounted for in this election: providence, God’s mysterious ways and plan for America.

Don’t ridicule the possibility that the Christian God of justice and grace might have a word to say at this crucial moment in our history. Our founders would not discount it. They insisted and put it in our founding documents that God guided and blessed America at its beginning – as we can see looking back, despite the existence of slavery and later segregation and despite very imperfect people trying to survive as a nation.

At this, likely the most embarrassing public moment of his life, is Trump possibly being humbled by God to prepare him to serve as president under difficult circumstances? His running mate, Gov. Mike Pence, has publicly spoken of Trump’s increasing private humility.

Remember how God humbled the great King David whom he called “a man after his own heart.” Consider that David lusted after a nude Bathsheba from the roof of his palace – ordered her to his quarters and impregnated her while her husband, Uriah, was away fighting battles as David’s leading field commander. Shortly David ordered Uriah home on leave, planning for him to sleep with his expectant wife and cover up David’s sin. But Uriah refused to go inside his own house, so David ordered him back to battle, assigning him to his sure death on the front line. Post-death David then took Bathsheba as his dearly beloved. In the end David repented – a broken man.

Back to Trump. A major recent accomplishment, often overlooked, came when he accused Obama of betraying America for refusing to say “radical Islamic terrorists.” Obama then revealed he is an unconscious Stockholm Syndrome victim of radical Islam. (See my research in my book, “The Stockholm Syndrome President, How Trump Triggered Obama’s Secret Confession”). Among other capitulations, Obama in denial has left a gift-wrapped nuclear bomb to Iran for them to open in eight years or less. “Do-nothing” Hillary Clinton intends to underscore the gift and invite more terrorists into America.

Millions of Americans sense that Trump would stand up to radical Islam and to Obama’s other destructive policies. For the past eight years, no one in D.C. has effectively opposed Obama’s pro-terrorist Iran agenda. To many Americans Trump is the last man standing.

Hillary Clinton, who enabled a compulsive sexual predator – her husband – to become president, now continues the deceptive “rehabilitation” of Bill Clinton’s image as a beloved Democratic president. How ironic that she now attempts to become president herself by portraying Donald Trump as a sexual abuser. Again she reveals that she will do anything to become president.

We have a very dark pot of a woman calling the kettle – her opponent – black. We ask, who has the darkest, most deceitful lying heart? Does she possess the character to be president? Can America tolerate four more years of presidential abuse on the heels of eight Obama years?

Finally, Hillary Clinton portrays Trump as someone you can’t trust with his finger on the nuclear trigger when she has already shown us what she will do. She supported giving Iran nuclear capability, denying the fact they will soon manufacture a bomb. She let Iran place their finger on the trigger of a nuclear weapon – another great act of enabling that threatens the whole world. God knows what else she will enable, but we do know that she’ll never own up to it. She will succeed Obama as the Great Enabler the Second – never dealing straight with America.

Consider Trump has promised to be the non-enabler of Iran and to do something meaningful about that most destructive agreement in American history. Voters must look beyond the smoke and mirrors of “ain’t Trump some bad sexual dude” to face what’s really at stake in this election.

Understand reality. To withdraw support for Trump at this late date is to support Hillary Clinton. Reality has presented us with two choices. Should we deal with complex reality or simply submit to superficial issues pumped up by the Democrats?

This article originally ran on World Net Daily.

The post Hillary the predator-enabler vs. ‘crude’ Donald Trump, WND Exclusive appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

My clinical research in deeper unconscious communication reveals that people communicate verbally—but unknowingly—around important issues especially when they’re not telling the truth.

Actually this is familiar to most from the basic way Jesus described the deeper mind in his famous dictum (to paraphrase), “the flaw you see in your neighbor may be the far larger flaw you secretly see in yourself—but deny and project onto your neighbor.” His “log in your eye” parable perfectly parallels the recent discovery of the unconscious super intelligence, the dazzling new unconscious. The discovery of the super intelligence represents a major paradigm shift in knowledge about the mind, how we communicate and who we really are. In short, at important times while the conscious mind speaks literally the unconscious mind speaks symbolically—in code.

Basically I am a decoder—utilizing very specific principles such as the fact the deeper mind always reads a reality event, a living fact, and must tell the truth.

I have demonstrated in a new book (The Stockholm Syndrome President: How Trump Triggered Obama’s Hidden Confession) and a previous one (The Obama Confession) that Barack Obama’s super-intel has repeatedly confessed between the lines that he’s an illegal president (programmed by radical Islam to disrupt America). But he has a cohort in crime. The stunning fact is that Michelle Obama unconsciously matches his “illegal president” confession for confession.

Anti-birther extraordinaire Michelle Obama simply cannot let go of the nagging issue of her husband’s birthplace. She continually testifies to her “protest too much” denial and offers vivid super-intel imagery of her husband’s guilt. Pay close attention to her projections.

September 28, 2016, Campaign Speech for Hillary Clinton

In a recent speech in Philadelphia on behalf of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign she again slammed people who continue to believe that Barack Obama was born in Kenya. “There are those who questioned and continue to question for the past eight years whether my husband was even born in this country,” she said.

Her first vivid projection with its hidden confession indicates that she herself has continually questioned for eight years if her husband was born in the United States. It’s her way of saying, “I know he wasn’t.”  She strongly implies a conscious cover-up on both their parts. Facts will reveal this is indeed a projection. Don’t miss she must—
must—continue to confess his illegal presidency as we will see.

Notice she never offers any actual proof of his eligibility to run for president. Neither does her husband as both avoid mentioning, with rare exceptions, the 2011 birth certificate he unexpectedly produced. They don’t want to draw attention to it because after expert examination, it has been judged by to be fraudulent.

The First Lady continues unconsciously describing herself in her next projection as she attacks Donald Trump, “Let me say hurtful, deceitful questions deliberately designed to undermine his [Obama’s] presidency…cannot be blamed on others or swept under the rug by an insincere sentence uttered at a press conference.”

This lady again wants to dogmatically sweep the rule of law under the table regarding her husband’s presidency. She confesses to being deliberately hurtful and deceitful towards America, insincere at this press conference and blaming others (in this case Trump).

She wants to bully the truth and the rule of law as her husband has done for two terms and as a candidate. But don’t overlook her own super-intel confession: unable to live with the guilt, she specifically undermines her husband’s presidency implying it’s illegal. Unconsciously she demands the truth be known and tells the truth on herself. The super-intel moral compass always means business.

The evidence is convincing that she constantly attacks the truth in her projections. She knows he was never vetted as a presidential candidate, concealed his records while spending millions of dollars to do so, until finally under pressure in 2011 produced a fraudulent birth certificate as expert document examiners led by Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s committee declared.

Forensic document experts who found evidence of forgery in the long-form certificate included Joseph F. Newcomer, Paul Irey, Doug Vogt and Mara Zebest, an expert in Adobe Photoshop whose report was published by American Thinker.com. Software designer Tom Harrison, a man with more than 30 years’ experience in graphic design, called the birth certificate “a document far too complicated to be genuine.”

Mrs. Obama knows not one government person in Washington, D.C. has dared to examine or question the phony document—controlled by a politically correct conspiracy of the media and Beltway insiders. Congress ignored any possibility of fraud.
Michelle Obama relentlessly attacks so-called birthers by depicting anyone who doubts Obama’s legality as racist—ignoring the basic rule of law question. The fundamental propaganda campaign is designed to brainwash and mislead the public by a say-it-loud and say-it-often strategy. This is their only weapon against the truth except for one—the all-seeing super intelligence which must invariably tell the truth.

In this same September 28^th speech, she spoke to younger voters who are considering casting a third-party “protest vote” or even staying home on Election Day. In one specific projection after another she paints a picture of a presidential candidate whose election must still be protested—alluding on the surface to Trump but deep down to her husband.  Read her deeper instructions: citizens can still cast a protest vote against her husband by insisting the 2011 phony birth certificate be officially examined.

She hints that both she and her husband should have stayed home and never run for president, allowing another legal (“third party”) candidate to run.

Reviewing several recent speeches this year she repeatedly confesses to her husband’s illegitimate presidency in disguised language while incessantly berating birthers.

Democratic National Convention July 2016

Michelle Obama praised Hillary Clinton proclaiming that she is the only presidential candidate who could be trusted with the children of the nation. Seemingly digressing, she then makes a crucial link. She mentioned how her job in the White House was to teach her daughters “to ignore those who question their father’s citizenship or faith.” Read her denial confession: she had to teach her daughters to deny the truth of their father’s lack of U.S. citizenship. In her projections Michelle confesses unconsciously that she questions his presidency, knowing in fact that it’s illegal. In this light she cannot be trusted to tell her own children the truth much less the children of this nation—nor could her husband as a presidential candidate. She underscores both she and the president and are untrustworthy.

Her projection instruction “question her husband’s faith” suggests he has transgressed God’s laws on telling the truth and acted in bad faith. Implicitly she’s instructing American citizens to question her husband’s legal birth certificate (his citizenship) and his truthfulness. She hints also at the question of his Muslim loyalties over his U.S. loyalties—a perfect match for Obama’s hidden confession mentioned above that he is a Stockholm Syndrome victim of radical Islam.

Often the media portrays the birth controversy as a challenge to her husband’s constitutional qualification for office as a “natural born citizen.” But there are other challenges: did Barack Obama lie about the state of Hawaii having his birth certificate on file in the records department—while refusing to release it—and did he lie again by producing a fake birth certificate in 2011? Both matters are completely provable. Deep down Michelle renders the verdict: he lied and she lied—and she will return to this fact over and over.

Unequivocally her unconscious even this late in his presidency must tell us her husband is an illegal president. Why? She knows it’s too late for Congress to do anything about it—and that they never would do so on their own.

But unknowingly she’s trying to incite a birther protest movement to demand the birth certificate be officially examined. She knows that her husband will continue his programmed Stockholm Syndrome attack on America. Obama has already announced he will be unbelievingly active as a former president—an unofficial hyper-aggressive third term.  Unless we restore the rule of law and hold him accountable he will continue to undermine the very foundation of America.

http://freedomoutpost.com/michelle-obama-secretly-confesses-her-husband-is-an-illegal-president/

The post Michelle Obama secretly confesses her husband is an illegal president, Freedom Outpost appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

As explained in my book The Deeper Intelligence, the super-intel tells the truth our conscious minds overlook, and that truth pours out in a psycholinguistic language of projections, denials and repeated matching imagery which I call thoughtprints.

Specifically it observes a precise event and weaves an encoded message about it.

The late Richard C. Halverson—an esteemed Washington insider and U.S. Senate Chaplain—called the super intelligence a revelation from God at this crucial time. Its natural law moral compass matches author Jonathan Cahn’s final conclusion in his best-seller The Harbinger: America must re-embrace natural law to survive.

Previously I have documented how the super-intel communicates in forensic profiling and in political profiling of leaders’ communications.

When journalists subconsciously pick up on a story which they missed, their super-intel often tells about it with a displaced story about someone else or another situation alluding to the more important matter.  It’s as if they’re playing a “sounds-like” journalistic game of charades.

Several elite journalists recently revealed that they unconsciously picked up on a major story, a story they simply did not want to see but which their super-intel insisted on telling.

One recent article stands head and shoulders above the rest leading the way to the truth.

In a stunning commentary published on March 24, 2016, Roger L. Simon—founder of pjmedia.com—underscored the crucial matter of the rule of law involving Hillary Clinton.

He insisted the magnitude of her alleged violations of national security via unsecured emails and influence-peddling to foreign nationals went far beyond similar violations by Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, both nearly impeached.

Unconsciously Simon suggests his concern about Hillary Clinton’s presidential eligibility in 2016 represents a thinly disguised secret cover for what really happened in the 2008 election with presidential candidate Barack Obama. Place the Clinton story as a template over the 2008 Obama candidacy and we find it fits perfectly with all the specific details.

The evidence is startling that Simon’s subconscious quick-read skills picked up on a far more threatening Obama story—one that he had embarrassingly missed and one that put America’s future in jeopardy.

Stuck in the back of Simon’s mind was the realization that Obama’s presidency began with an enormous legal issue in which the rule of law was brazenly flaunted. It’s as if Simon’s super-intel shouts at the world—and himself—in a shocking déjà vu.

Unknowingly he has uncovered the most powerful secret story in the history of America.

On the surface talking about 2016, Simon said, “This is far and away the most important issue of the election. All others pale compared to it.” In other words, it’s the most important issue in any election.

How it’s resolved “will affect the very backbone of our country—the rule of law. No democratic society can exist without it. No person, no matter how high, can be above it. Without the rule of law, the United States of America as we know it does not exist.”

‘Guilty person in the White House’
Those who care about America, he insists, want no “guilty person in the White House.”  Simon’s blatant imagery suggests there is one there now.

But he “fears Democrats don’t care.” Their leaders have “no tough questions for a candidate who lied under oath.” He sees “journalists tip-toeing around truth” reflecting cowardice, “a presidential opponent indifferent to the truth lying that people don’t care [about the rule of law],” and Democrats laughing—“on the grave of our country, now in a drastic free fall.”

Unconsciously Simon saw the question of Obama’s legal citizenship was quickly swept under the rug in 2008—and with it the rule of law. Simon lists the guilty parties: both political parties, the press, the opposing candidates and the courts. In short the entire political establishment.

Simon’s perceptive super-intel sees that America and its media lost their backbone by rejecting natural law in 2008 with the shallow vetting of Obama.

He implies Obama was an illegal candidate—a foreign national selfishly peddling influence as the first black president. Simon suggests that Obama lied to the people about his own unique key communication—the birth certificate, a vulnerable untrustworthy document—violating the Constitution and national security from the get-go.

Simon’s super-intel urgently warns that the question has dramatically shifted. Will the rule of law be broken by a current Democratic candidate? No, the real question is has it already been broken by Obama. Simon implies a secret World War III is well underway, and we and the media have overlooked the recent surprise attack by a secret foreigner.

Simon’s article then envisions a tainted president, newly inaugurated in 2017, whom half the public knows “should been indicted,” and shortly new evidence emerges leading to a potential impeachment.

He declares, “It’s a catastrophe for the world—an absent American leader when needed most in a time as dangerous as WW II.”

Decoding Simon’s super-intel imagery we find more specific details about Obama’s presidency—confirming the deeper story.

At Obama’s inauguration many citizens (“half the public”) thought he was an illegal foreign-born president. More evidence emerged when Obama finally produced a complete birth certificate. Independent document examiners quickly determined it to be a forgery, but the media and Congress ignored the findings. The people didn’t. Talk of impeachment surfaced but dissipated.

A shocking cover-up had occurred leaving an illegal president in office and the powers-that-be ignoring the entire matter while the people felt helpless.

Indeed it was a catastrophe: an absent president— and on top of that an absent leader of the free world— failing to protect us or our allies. He has become a threat to world peace who enabled violence and chaos in the Middle East, chaos that is now spreading to Europe.  The media refused to tell the story they should be telling nightly, a story Simon himself still cannot consciously recognize that he failed to see.

The true Obama legacy: Secret Mussolini

Simon’s super-intel ends powerfully by linking this matter to Obama. He warns Obama to keep his sticky hands out of an FBI/DOJ investigation.  In other words, his hands were all over the 2008 election when he ignored the Constitution by violating the rule of law. Now Obama “can forget about a legacy.”

Simon’s final message to Obama, “call Donald Trump Mussolini if you want but…he doesn’t hold a candle to you.” Obama’s the dictator president who took the law into his own hands and sent America reeling toward self-destruction, just as Mussolini ruined his native Italy. The America we all thought we knew no longer exists until we restore the rule of law.

What now? Simon’s super-intel guides us: no person above the law; no guilty person in the White House; the future of America depends on it.

It’s too late for impeachment now, but Obama must be held accountable for what he did. In the past as a nation we thought we could get away with slavery and then segregation—violating natural law. We solved the last problem when Martin Luther King Jr. spoke for all: America must apply the same colorblind law of freedom to all and cease violating it.

Out of deep residual guilt in 2008 Americans understandably allowed the “first black president” rule to supplant the rule of law, and Obama was never fully vetted. Now we must return to the idea that nobody’s above the rule of law. Many enabled Obama, but he alone must face the consequences if he deviated from the moral compass.

Simon emphasizes that rule-breaking has consequences. America’s leaders are caught up in a self-sabotaging cycle. One bad decision in which they failed America—enabling Obama—leads to another “guilt begets guilt/ “deserve punishment” cycle. That’s a major reason they’ve tolerated years of presidential abuse by Obama. Until it’s made conscious, it will continue.

Simon’s unconscious wisdom implies that Obama should still be independently investigated by the government. For the sake of America’s future, we must face the truth.

Secretly Simon reveals how the super-intel operates in a journalist who insists on telling the truth to America and to himself. As a result it’s one of the most important political articles in history.

For the record, however, Simon unconsciously predicts Obama—the continual law-breaker—will act to prevent any indictment of Hillary Clinton, if necessary.

Explains media hatred of Trump
Simon also explains the media’s animus toward Donald Trump. Recall that Trump was the only prominent American who consistently accused Obama of being born in Kenya. Although he made those statements long before becoming a presidential candidate, Trump’s stand demonstrated the kind of courage and leadership our country needs. It was truly a presidential moment. As a result, Trump creates enormous secret guilt in these elite reporters who failed to protect America.

Intuitively WND has recently suggested revisiting the matter of Obama’s eligibility (http://www.wnd.com/2016/03/what-is-a-natural-born-citizen). It’s possible that—after witnessing Obama’s repeated presidential abuse of the law—Americans may now be ready to face the question.

Not surprisingly, several other journalists have unconsciously perceived the same thing that Simon did about Obama’s egregious violation. Their super-intel insists on telling the truth they missed. Columnist David Brooks and writers from the Atlantic monthly and the National Review all unconsciously confessed to enabling Obama to evade constitutional requirements. As leading reporters, they failed to tell the unbiased truth to their readers. These journalists are all unknowingly furious with Trump for standing up for the rule of law in the face of an illegal president.  This colors their take on Trump significantly.

Consider the scariest twist of all for them. As president, Trump could boldly launch an official investigation into the authenticity of Obama’s birth certificate. Trump —no stranger to tackling big deals—could be the one person in America capable of helming such a probe. Imagine how deeply that alarms elite journalists whose failure would be completely exposed, and they’d no longer be able to escape into their secret den of denial.

If we do not see the high price our nation pays when its leaders violate the rule of law, subliminal guilt and self-sabotage will continue. For example the Republican establishment may well sabotage the 2016 election and split the party asunder if it does not handle the presidential nomination with kid gloves. Any sense that the peoples’ will has been violated will destroy the GOP—and hand the election to the Democrats.

The post Journalists confess: Hillary’s violations mirror Obama’s illegal presidency appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

Between the lines his brilliant unconscious super intelligence weaves a deeper far more powerful narrative using the psycholinguistic language of denial and projection.

The same unconscious mind that Jesus referred to symbolically when he said the speck you see in your neighbor’s eye may unconsciously be the log in your own. He urged “decode” the specific faults/issues you project onto others—that reveal your hidden motives.  We follow the faults Obama sees in others in his speech.

Strikingly, he testified to his deeply personal narrative by referencing himself 78 times in that 30-minute tearful speech.

Two central ideas summarized his motivation for gun control: murders of children and the need for background checks. Unconsciously Obama implies, “something horrific, a violent near-death experience involving a weapon happened to me as a young child– check my background.” A story he’s told before but never so clearly.

His deeper narrative reveals a deeply disturbing post-traumatic stress disorder. Throughout the speech he’s secretly talking about himself and his own buried trauma.  It’s a theme he returns to repeatedly. Numerous speeches —Father’s Day, Inauguration, United Nations, etc.—and letters to his daughters reveal his obsession with children in danger of being killed.

He then explains who pointed the gun at him and was about to pull the trigger. He can still feel the cold barrel pressed firmly against his temple, his heart beating out of his chest, his skin cold and clammy.

Obama’s great PTSD secret, the gunshot wound that nearly killed him, was his near-abortion  This matches his central thoughtprint code in his speech: the violent murder of innocent children with metal weapons.

Abortion images
Unconsciously he presents numerous thoughtprints, images of abortion (which fits the chaotic circumstances surrounding his conception.)

In a key story Obama clearly pictures an unintended pregnancy— an (unborn) kid “who hadn’t even gotten started in life,” who was murdered:  He was in the wrong place, wrong time—and a bad decision was made suggesting an abortion. Yet the kid was exactly “where any kid would be…my kids” implying Obama himself in the womb when the twin gunmen—mother and father—plotted to kill him.
Obama tells about “a disturbed person in China took a knife and tried to kill a bunch of children in China.” See the abortionist clutching the scalpel in his hands.

Revealingly in tears, he talks about the murder of first-graders, beginners, “from [a] family…never imagined that their loved one would be taken from our lives by a bullet from a gun.” Read unconsciously he never imagined his parents would take the life of “their loved one”—him—with an abortion bullet.

Obama mentions kids getting killed “on the streets of Chicago every day—it makes me mad.” He suggests his hometown, more clearly his near-death by abortion in his original home place, his mother’s womb specifically linking this to his anger.

Other abortion images include “In 2013 alone …30 children younger than five years old” were killed in gun accidents.

Obama’s super-intel moral compass unmistakably defines abortion as killing children.

Obama underscores the thought of kids being killed—kids such as his unborn self—makes him mad. The real roots of his secret rage. He goes on to reveal all the different guns he uses “to kill America” in his misguided deeply abusive attacks–as he was abused.

First he’s an abortion enabler. Passing along his pain, he unconsciously attacks the unborn kids just as he was attacked when an unborn, totally unprotected.

His super-intel elaborates on his destructive intentions in another major denial, “We all believe in the First Amendment, but we accept that you can’t yell ‘fire’ in a theater.” His rich imagery vividly depicts his near-abortion. The dark safe room of the theater a picture of an unborn child in his mother’s womb as a wonderful drama unfolds. Will the creative unborn masterpiece make it out into the bright of day?

Cruelly someone yells fire. In the pandemonium, the crowd rushes out and a person is trampled to death in the dark. The drama stops as the screen goes blank, and Obama’s imagery has just pictured the completed abortion.

Unconsciously he continually replays the scene over and over: his parents panicking, yelling fire, and burning him up inside the womb—or almost.

In turn he sets fire to America attempting to panic and destroy—trampling on the people and the Constitution with inflammatory rhetoric.

Read through his blatant denial confession, “This is not a plot to take away everybody’s guns,” to see his ultimate goal. Just like he falsely idealizes other countries where citizens have no guns.

No guns for America means he wants citizens to feel as unprotected as he does. Obama confesses he’s killing America in three fundamental ways– as he was killed.

A new warning about Iran deal
Not only has the president tried to take away America’s guns, as the world’s slickest gun-seller Obama has given weapons to Iran.

He criticizes gun sellers “operating under different rules” who sell weapons to known violent felons with a known history “of serious crimes…assault… illegal gun possession.” No background check, no questions asked, buying “deadly weapons all too easily” which can end up with terrorists.

Decode Obama’s unconscious confession. Secretly he’s the gun lobby which “holds America hostage” (as his parents still hold him hostage in his PTSD mind). Operating under different presidential rules he’s selling earth threatening weapons to the terrorist Iran ignoring their background of building illegal nuclear weapons and terrorist assaults.

Yet his super-intel insists such gun sellers be stopped “wherever” they operate, meaning as far away as Iran. He demands that guns not “get into the hands of people who shouldn’t have them.” Unknowingly Obama instructs the world his nuclear deal with Iran must be stopped.

Obama warns nation about dangers of abortion
Obama confesses to a second major way he’s killing America—supporting abortion. As a near-abortion abuse victim, Obama also unconsciously protects the unborn. Deep down he’s a secret pro-life spokesman.

Obama closes his speech referring to the young man who was murdered–“who hadn’t even gotten started in life”—again picturing an abortion. He insists the unalienable right of life is stripped from such a kid. If we love our country we will protect these unborn. Unconsciously Obama’s super-intel warns us the future of America depends on it or eventually we destroy the country and our heritage of protecting all lives. We tear down the country we inherited by killing the kids we inherit.

He urges courageous non-stop protests—even sacrificing lives –to stop abortion murders.

Confession of illegal presidency
His gun control speech confirms another “top secret” subconscious confession (also previously revealed in various statements). Of all the guns he has aimed at America, his most basic and violent attack was against our Constitution when he was elected as an illegal foreign-born president.

Key comments in his speech highlight this deeper narrative.

“It’s… why we’re going to ensure that federal [mental health] records are submitted to the background check system, and remove barriers that prevent states from reporting relevant information.”

His deeper story: the state of Hawaii on his order has refused to release his birth records. These clarify his relevant “mental health” qualifications to be president. To become an illegal president reflects impaired judgment and massive deception.

He suggests the state of Hawaii birth records are now federal records and that congress should remove all barriers preventing their release to check his background—even now.
He implies his public “birth certificate” is a phony.

Operating above the law, he “holds America hostage” with his first black president role immune to confrontation.

But his super-intel sees an illegal president violates our founders’ very words of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”

To live a lie means violating our “life”—our integrity, who we say we are as a nation.
We give up our liberty when someone takes from us liberties they don’t have. We cannot be happy when we tolerate the abuse and injustice of a lie. Secretly we become a passive victim, a shadow of our formerly great nation, now held hostage by Obama.

Obama’s super-intel-intel guides us very precisely: take the nuclear bomb away from Iran, stop abortions now, and stop killing the constitution—face the truth of his illegitimate presidency even now.

Unconsciously he senses the urgency for drastic action more than anyone. Also, he’s revealed the core trauma which still controls him—only his unconscious can tell us: the gun pointed at him.

The post Obama Gun Control: “killing America” as he nearly killed appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..