Dr. Christine Ford now puts her accusation of Judge Brett Kavanaugh before America front and center.

In so doing, the words of Jesus confront her—and America—with a warning: be careful of the very flaw you so clearly see in Judge Kavanaugh, it may well be the log in your eye. Beware the unconscious log in your eye which you may be so eager to project onto another. Jesus implied to Dr. Ford that ‘You possess a deeper law of human nature, a moral compass, deep in your subconscious by which you read yourself so quickly—this compass is so accurate that it will make your head swim.’

See his use of symbolic language secret ‘tells’—the log in your eye, you are the very neighbor you accuse. You are looking in the mirror. Decode—read—your secret tell language. This is how your unconscious speaks at key moments like the Senate hearings; indeed this is a key moment for America.

In his utter brilliance and brevity, using “his log in the eye” metaphor, Jesus put before the world His instincts about the unconscious super-intelligence and defined its unique symbolic language. The very brilliant unconscious waiting to be discovered when it was, finally in 1973. I was in on that discovery early and validated it with years of clinical research.

The issue is we have: Party A (Dr. Ford) accusing Party B (Kavanaugh) of sexually assaulting her. In the projection “log in your eye” paradigm we ask, “Dr. Ford, could you be unconsciously, unknowingly confessing that you have seriously assaulted another (or maybe several human beings) in matters totally unrelated to Judge Kavanaugh? Are you now also unconsciously scapegoating him to relieve your own guilt?”

She reports early on, “I don’t have all the answers, and I don’t remember as much as I would like to,” adding that “the details about that night…I will never forget.”’ But suppose she’s merged details of another night when she inflicted severe trauma on someone else. We will see other references to memory gaps. She will tell us she never processed the matter at the time in 1982, but primarily avoided it for years, making it a rich minefield for further distortion.

To be clear, a person can strongly find fault with another person but be passionately mistaken on the facts. Did the Democrats on the committee, or the mainstream left-leaning media, ever once consider that powerful, unconscious motivations could be coloring Ford’s testimony? This indeed is a shame because Dr. Ford’s “dazzling new unconscious” tells a powerful deeper story of major projection onto Kavanaugh.

In her Senate testimony, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford tells two stories simultaneously–one conscious and one unconscious. Yet she has no conscious idea of doing so. Do the stories match? No. She tells a far more compelling unconscious story guided by her super-intelligence, again the “dazzling new unconscious” which reads a person’s truth in the blink of an eye and speaks in projection images.

As a practicing psychiatrist for more than 40 years, I’ve had extensive experience in decoding the unconscious. I’ve also taught my method to psychiatry residents in a medical center as I supervised their psychotherapy cases. In 1995, I wrote a book about this discovery, The Deeper Intelligence.

As a therapist and training as a physician, I treat sexual abuse victims. I’ve often helped post-abortion women heal from the inner pain and guilt they experience because of their abortions. I’ve helped women who think they want an abortion to understand how they tell themselves deep down that such a decision destroys their unborn’s life.

This is how I decode, how I help people heal, how I solve criminal cases as a forensic profiler being guided by a person’s super-intel. I repeat the story they are trying to tell themselves, yet in decoded terms, trying to find the truth that might set them free.

Even a quick look at her September 27 testimony before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee reveals that Christine Ford is dealing with a major traumatic event fixated in her psyche. But it’s not primarily the one her conscious mind thinks. Her super-intel is reading her in real time, moment by moment, trying to uncover the unconscious truth.

Republican senators’ secret tell to themselves
In taking Ford’s testimony, the Republican senators called in an expert rape prosecutor, and that decision itself revealed unconsciously that they are not trained interviewers who can look more deeply into the matter. The message from their own collective super-intel was we need someone who can really help us get to the full truth – someone who can read unconscious messages. Instinctively they know Ford would communicate unconsciously.

They need a new mind expert who can read the messages Ford’s super-intel is delivering with its super perception and super communication. Like all of us, the senators have a lot to learn from the new unconscious. They can learn to read symbolic projection language—secret tells.

Again, notice how all the Democratic senators believed Ford’s conscious story. So did much of the media. They are unaware of the new unconscious super-intel and secret tells—how you get to the deeper story. But this is the very last thing the Dems want – deeper motives, deeper story—especially one that reinforces their political agenda against the protection of the unborn. It’s as though they’re saying, “How dare you interrupt the courageous Dr. Ford’s conscious story without a whiff of hidden deeper motives?”

We will see how far from the truth this is and later in a future article how the Democratic senators on the committee demonstrated their own super- intel read on themselves. Their blind adherence to Ford’s conscious story, reveals how they are degrading themselves and the moral compass undergirded by America’s natural law.

As we examine Ford’s Senate testimony, we see that she is unconsciously interviewing herself. Again, her super-intel is the secret reporter presenting her cohesive hidden story in a plethora of revealing images as I mentioned in my previous article.

I will separate her obvious conscious messages from her unconscious ones.

Central motive: Reading through Dr. Ford’s denials

Immediately she says, “I’m not here today because I want to be. I am terrified.”

Denial confessions are often a key part of the story—especially log in your eye stories. You decode by reading through the denial. On the surface, she states that she doesn’t want to be here, but the deeper message is this: “I very much want to be here with my secret agenda, which is why I wrote my letter in the first place. I also am terrified of being here and very divided, but my wish to be here is by far the strongest.” We will learn why she is unconsciously terrified.

Another blatant denial – “I am not political” – means exactly the opposite. In fact, she is deeply politically motivated. Her behavioral tells such as participating in the anti-Trump Women’s March of January 21, 2017, reflect this strongly. She is a strong pro-choice advocate for abortion on demand. This is a major key to her comments completely challenging the notion she has no motive other than purity. But for Dr. Ford, politics are very personal.

Next, we hear another denial, fundamentally an overt lie: “It’s not my responsibility to determine whether Kavanaugh deserves to sit on the Supreme Court.” When she declares, “I am here because I believe it is my civic duty” that duty is precisely to prevent his selection. Her strongest unconscious civic duty is to prevent the selection of a conservative judge who might overturn Roe vs Wade. Once more she will tell just how personal a matter abortion is to her and why a pro-life justice would terrify her.

In the process, she also unconsciously instructs the committee to do the responsible thing by refusing to endorse her testimony—especially to understand her hidden story.

Consider another prior denial she made, essentially saying, “I did not intend my letter to go public and wanted to remain anonymous.” Look how determined she was to go public. She contacted The Washington Post on her own. Going public was her unconscious secret plan all along. She’d have to make a public appearance if she wanted to make an impact – and indeed she did. Unconsciously she delayed her plan until the last minute for maximum effect. Most of all she needs to tell her deeper story to the world.

Instruction on how to listen to super intelligence secret tells

Her brilliant super-intel confesses to hidden communication, “A reporter snuck into her class. I thought it was a student at first.” In other words, she’s secretly reporting on herself. The super-intel repeatedly tries to announce its presence. It especially presents educational message markers – here a reporter disguised as a student suggests powerfully, “Be a student, senators. Learn about my unconscious messages.”

She then adds to the message specifically how to do it. She speaks of sending “encrypted” messages to the Washington Post reporter. Read the tell– her unconscious is reporting things about her in an encrypted symbolic confession. She instructs the senators and America to decode her unconscious reads on herself now.

She continues to unconsciously instruct on how to listen. Her reference to being a diver and a member of the diving team at the club pool during the summer of the alleged assault suggests, “Read deeper; hear my deepest story.” She’s unknowingly confessing that “I’m ‘taking a dive’ for the Democrats’ primary cause at this moment in history – abortion rights on demand.

But above all, Ford’s running from her secret guilt, as we shall see.

Again her central emotional trauma—abortion guilt

She now addresses her primary unconscious emotional trauma. She linked the primary reason for coming forward in August in her unconscious message and denial confession to the Washington Post, when she asked the rhetorical question, “Why suffer through the annihilation if it’s not going to matter?” That projection implies that unborn children have suffered annihilation at her hands, unconsciously upending her life. At that point, violent abortion imagery leaped off the pages of her story. HeHHr unconscious imagery patterns presented a cohesive deeper abortion story. A story I have heard many times.

Now in her Senate testimony, Ford’s super-intel presents even more violent abortion imagery in a stunning unconscious validation of her previous story. That’s a hallmark of the super-intel – it will repeat the same story over and over, to be heard in different ways.

Early in her testimony, she again links the idea of her coming forward to blame Kavanaugh, “to jumping in front of a train headed down the track anyway and be personally annihilated.” In other words, her primary abortion guilt motive is running over an unborn like a train, annihilating them. In turn, she feels so guilty that she’s considers punishing herself such as by jumping in front of a train.

Note the key marker “personally annihilated” suggesting strongly she was very personally involved. Suggests “I personally annihilated an unborn.” Either an extremely close friend or very likely she herself underwent an abortion. In her work as a therapist and as a political activist, Ford has personally enabled many more women to abort their babies. There is no wrong more primal than a mother taking her child’s life. Ford informs us unconsciously she knows full well life begins at conception. Her super-intel specializes in detailed imagery.

She also describes how the life-destroying “train [is] headed on down the track anyway.” Unknowingly she secretly announces, “I plan to continue my strong pro-abortion activities.” Bear in mind that Ford reportedly works as a consultant to a pharmaceutical firm that manufactures the abortifacient medication known as the morning-after pill. As such, Ford indirectly enables thousands of abortions.

Violent images continue. She repeats in her testimony that she feared “being inadvertently killed by Kavanaugh.” Again she repeats she was fearful of being raped but clearly was not. That’s a powerful hint of an abortion assault – a total life-destroying rape of the unborn. She references “death threats,” someone threatening her life and that of her family, multiple death references. Read the projection, “I made severe death threats and in very real ways carried them out on unborn babies.”

We note that Brett Kavanaugh did not personally annihilate her, push her in front of a train, kill her, rape her, physically hurt her or threaten her with death. These images are hers and hers alone emanating from her all-seeing super-intel that is reading her deepest motives in public before this Senate hoping they will catch on.

It’s really a basic confession of her primary motive: Claiming Kavanaugh did violence to her but actually admitting that she has done violence to the unborn.

We find several less violent and more disguised abortion images, but they clearly fit with her unconscious confession. Such seemingly innocent images of being a “bystander” and “100 percent certainty” of Kavanaugh’s identity and guilt points again to standing by when an abortion occurs. Again, she suggests that she has enabled numerous abortions and plans to continue doing so in the future. Her image of “100 percent” certainty implies absolute awareness of her guilt and secret identity: pro-abortion activist.

Womb-home images

Deep down, all women see their womb as a protective house. Women who abort invariably talk about flawed or destroyed houses. Again Dr. Ford repeats her previous story filled with images of houses, secret key references to her guilt.

She particularly confirms her confession now today linking death to a house, her house specifically. Reportedly due to death threats “we had to move out of our house”—suggesting just as she moved an unborn from her womb. “Family was separated” as she separated an unborn from her womb.

We will see other images of houses coming up as we explore her testimony further. The reader can reflect on the numerous references to houses which she presents in her story. There she will strongly suggest exactly what set her off in 2012 to begin a potential anti-Kavanaugh campaign. We will pick up on that in the next article as we slowly process Ford’s testimony. Image by image. Tell by tell. Confession by confession.

Conclusion:

In my informed opinion, Ford is publicly confessing to the U.S. Senate and America that her motives are primarily political and that her most powerful emotional trauma is unrelated to Brett Kavanaugh. Again, she confesses her primary driver is her deep guilt which is now in real time the major source of her terror.

She’s projecting her abortion guilt onto Judge Kavanaugh as a result of her continued victimization of numerous unborns and very possibly her own deep personal trauma.

Along the way, she reveals her true intent to make sure the next Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court will be someone who would not overturn Roe v. Wade. That would personally terrify her beyond belief. It would doubly clarify in her mind she has violated the hallowed laws of maternal nature.

In her demands for an FBI investigation of Kavanaugh, consider yet another projection. Read, somebody please look for my deeper motives and help me see the emotional trauma that haunts and terrifies me.

The post Christine Ford’s Secret Unconscious ‘Tells’ Continue Before The Senate – Part One appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

The focus on Ford’s body language by several analysts draws attention to the subconscious. By extension it points to the dazzling new unconscious – the super intelligence – and its new unconscious “mind language,” a verbal language of symbolic tells which communicates in far greater detail than body language. The super-intel offers the possibility of learning so much more about crucial situations such as Ford’s testimony – reading her in the blink of an eye.

It isn’t easy to shift focus from literal communication and learn the new unconscious mind language. A comparison to body language can help. While body language communicates symbolically by arranging physical positions, facial expressions and hand gestures, the super-intel communicates verbally using symbolic imagery. It unconsciously arranges sentences rich in images – secret tells – revealed in a certain order.

It communicates new information beyond denial and coverup. But as with body language, super-intel messages must be decoded. Invariably, as the decoding moves forward, patterns emerge which tell a coherent overall story.

As a practicing psychiatrist for more than 35 years, I’ve had extensive experience in decoding the unconscious. I wrote a book about the newly discovered super-intel, The Deeper Intelligence. I am a physician and therapist. I treat sexual abuse victims. I’ve often helped post-abortion women heal from the inner pain and guilt they experience because of their abortions. I’ve taught women who think they want an abortion how to allow their super-intel’s violent imagery to show them they’re destroying a life…and I  watched them change their mind.

Now consider the high-stakes context in the U.S. Senate prior to Ford’s testimony: the Democrats were lawlessly attempting to overthrow the Constitution and prevent a pro-life justice from confirmation – and it was all around a single issue: abortion. They harbor a deep fear of Roe v. Wade being overturned.

Christine Ford’s initial major tell can easily be decoded. When she said, “I’m coming forward to do my civic duty,” what was her major civic duty in life prior to coming forward? She was a dedicated abortion-on-demand activist. She marched in her local version of the Women’s March the day after Donald Trump’s inauguration. Yet, as her all-knowing, truth-telling super-intel suggests, her real civic duty is to put an end to the horror of legalized abortion in America once and for all.

In two previous articles, I outlined my earlier decoding of Ford’s testimony:

• Christine Ford’s Secret Tells Point To Powerful, Deeper Motive
• Christine Ford’s Secret Unconscious ‘Tells’ Continue Before The Senate – Part One

I’ve shown how Ford unconsciously presented violent projection images linked to Kavanaugh’s alleged assault which fit with abortion – her assault of the unborn – and not Kavanaugh. These included: “being personally annihilated,” jumping in front of a train suggesting mutilation, “accidentally killed,” not allowed to breathe, a suffocated victim and brutally raped.

Again, deep down all pregnant women see their womb as a protective house for the unborn – biologically, that’s precisely what it is. Women who abort invariably link it to destruction to houses and protective enclosures. Ford referred to death threats to her personal home, having to move out. She spontaneously added “the family was separated” implying again permanent separation from her unborn child.

All in all, Ford’s unconsciously confessing her primary motive – blaming Kavanaugh to escape her own overwhelming, self-punishing guilt. Claiming Kavanaugh’s violence to her caused her a lifelong trauma, she admits her personal violence on her own unborn was the true cause of her post-traumatic suffering.

From scene to scene, Ford’s story accusing Kavanaugh centers around events in houses. We return to her testimony (repeated in a Washington Post interview) paying close attention to her images, her secret symbolic tells. Step by step she takes us through her secret story. Never taking her eyes off her unborn in her womb home she aborted after an unexpected pregnancy.

Her symbolic imagery reveals a powerful story – like a parable that must be decoded – of what her abortion looked like to her and why she remains fixated in an unconscious post-traumatic stress disorder.

Scene 1: Living at home

Ford starts her story by recalling when she lived at her parents’ home as a 15-year-old. That preamble established a specific foundation.  She’s underlining the most basic rule of life starting with her own right to life in her mother’s womb, her absolute right to her own life. Her mother honored that inviolate right throughout her pregnancy as did Ford’s father. They had already named her while she was yet unborn.

In her Senate testimony, Ford’s confessing precisely what she should have done for herunborn. Thus, she reveals her deep maternal rule that an unborn pre-eminently has a home and a life in the womb.

She indicates that the rules of the home – her own room, her own life in the family home – started in the womb. Over and over, she witnessed her parents acknowledging her right to her own life, her privacy rights in her own room – for example, by telling her two brothers to stay out of her room, to knock before they came in. She will repeat this message in multiple secret images in her brief story.

Unknowingly she speaks for all unborns in their mother’s womb and all unborns who have been aborted. She still fully understands that her unborn baby should have been protected – allowed to grow up as she did. See my right, “I got to grow up.” The power of her first scene speaks the guiding wisdom of the most basic maternal compass.

SCENE 2
How I got pregnant: Rules broken– Terrified

Ford’s super-intel quickly informs us how she got pregnant, her eyes ever on her unborn. Her detailed imagery symbolically confesses that she knowingly violated her parents’ wisdom by going to another party with boys, recklessly drank freely and – after casual sex – became unexpectedly pregnant.

In her testimony, Ford frankly revealed that she had attended “notorious parties,” parties far wilder than the relatively calm party which took place the night of the alleged Kavanaugh assault.

From the beginning, Ford’s super-intel is saying, “I am really talking about another party and my true post-traumatic trauma: aborting my unexpected unborn child.”

Recently, reported stories from her high-school annuals and college acquaintancesconfirm Ford’s teenage promiscuity, heavy drinking, and drug use. They depict ayoung woman nearly blacking out and wrecking cars.

One witness, who attended the University of North Carolina named D.C. McAllister, recently posted on Twitter: “Christine Blasey Ford was a classmate of mine at UNC. We graduated in 1988. I want to ask Christine if she remembers partying at Trolls, drinking at He’s Not Here. Hooking up with guys at Henderson Street. Eating at Time Out. Remember those days, Christine?”

When Christine violated her parents’ rule she points symbolically to the intrinsic maternal law she violated. Her imagery is a secret tell: “I broke my unborn’s life, I aborted its life” – the deepest, most protective instinct in her body.

Describing to the Washington Post how “terrified” she was of violating her parents’ rules by going to the unsupervised party, points unconsciously to a far greater terror. She and her female friends bragged in their high-school annuals over three years – 1982-83-84 – about violating parental rules.

She has a deep terror over violating the maternal laws of her unborn’s life, God’s laws, life-giving laws deep inside her which she’s never owned but knows to her super-intel core – and continues encouraging other women to violate.

Her huge secret tell with which she opened her testimony, “I am terrified,” speaks volumes. We all answer to the Supreme Judge as our founders called him in the Declaration of Independence. That’s the true source of her terror and trauma.

Scene 3

The house, the womb home – massive denial
(Story: no recall of where, when, and transportation to party)

Ford arrives at the party house, the house at center stage.  She can’t recall where it was, when it was, how she got there and how she got home. Her super-intel communicating the feminist code about how to handle an unwanted careless pregnancy – massive denial.

In other words, she’s saying, “I don’t recognize my womb as a home for this unborn – where it is, that it really exists in my body, when it happened, how it got there or how it got home. Because it never got to stay in its home – when I aborted its life. It’s not a human unborn. Just some kind of little tissue. Just a thing.”

That’s the typical feminist mantra – abortion means you never have to say you’re sorry to your unborn baby because it never existed. You don’t have to remember where the party was you had sex, when you had it, how you got there (or home), or even that you got pregnant because you don’t really have a womb home for your unborn, it’s all yours.  Live in denial your unborn you aborted never got to stay home in your womb.

Memory deficits regarding the location of the party house, when it happened or how she arrived or got home also suggest a near blackout at the party at which Ford got pregnant, consistent with her prior history. 

One fact Ford remembered from the alleged party was drinking a single beer. Her denial – “I was not drunk” – can be decoded as an admission that on the night she got pregnant “I was very drunk.” Her story confirms this.

Scene 4:

Party – more denial and hiding

Next scene – a party going on at the house. Ford suggests another form of typical denial by which feminists handle the reality of eliminating unborns. Party baby, party hardy. “Manic partying” in the face of hidden depressive guilt. Think of the Women’s March on Jan 22, 2016 in which Ford participated. Women chanting “F*ck Trump,” singing, demanding, threatening with overt violence on display. It was group-think at its finest to cope with the unconscious stress of sending unborns away from their womb home.

Scene 5:

The womb room – first the living room of the unborn
(Story: Ford responds to specific inquiry: memory of party house)

Asked by the senatorial rape prosecutor at her testimony what she specifically recalled about the house that night of the party, Ford described very particular rooms. Secretly she presents rich images of how a womb room is an unborn’s home – and what happened to her unborn.

“Living room” is a rich image suggesting first “life, alive” – her living womb where Ford gave life to her unborn – for a while.

Unconsciously she vividly recalls “The Living Room” womb, her unborn alive and thriving. Its central room where it lived, where it should have been allowed to keep living.  Where she would have fed it constantly growing on its own, alive and well. Allowed to play and tumble in her womb, communicate with her by kicking her at times, knocking on the uterine wall. (Remember that image.)

Deep down she can still see her unborn in its own living room womb room. How well “living room” matches perfectly Ford’s opening image suggesting where she began her life living in her mother’s womb room.

The laws of maternal nature are cited again. Your unborn has the right to live however and whenever it arrived in your womb home. The entire womb is the unborn’s living room.

Scene 6:

The bathroom – unborn’s private bath

The next room she recalls is the upstairs bathroom, a private bathroom in the party house. Her secret tell: her womb was her unborn’s private bath where it bathed in the amniotic fluid, where you let the unborn bathe and thrive by drawing nutrients. She’s painting a super-intel picture of the law of maternal nature.

Unknowingly Ford can still see in the back of her mind that vivid picture of her unborn surrounded in its private bath of amniotic fluid in her womb. A very similar picture every mother has of her young baby taking a bath in the bathtub after its born.

Ford’s cohesive secret story continues – image after image.

Scene 7:

The Womb – Where the unborn beds down and sleeps and bedroom

Then Ford recalls three more specifics: a bedroom and a bed and a nearby bathroom. First, her womb home was her unborn’s constant bedroom where it bedded down, slept in its own womb bed. See how well the imagery fits, again emphasizing the law of maternal nature – the baby has the right to continually bed down in her womb house.

Going upstairs to a bedroom also suggests a newborn baby’s own literal room – a common special room in the home. The baby’s room.

Later in life, Ford would deliver two living children with all these memories she missed with her unborn child. We can be sure they would remind her of her unborn.

Scene 8:

The womb:  How I got pregnant, why I enable abortions, why accused Kavanaugh
(Story: Ford reports Kavanaugh assault in bedroom with Mark Judge present)

Step back. This is the key scene of violence where Ford accused Kavanaugh of assault. It’s an important scene suggesting her pregnancy and abortion. We continue reading her story as a projection.

She has set her story up with stunning images of an unborn living in her womb.

Now in the bedroom, she suggests where she got pregnant with her unborn.

She describes a very chaotic scene – events in bed with two different men in one night in the same bed both very drunk. First alone with one, the other jumps on the bed on top of the two, then gets off shortly jumps back on top and chaos ensues.

First, she suggests she got pregnant by one man while both were very drunk. Far more than one beer.  A man who did take her clothes off. Her history of drinking heavily, using drugs and promiscuity has been reported by former classmates. She even admitted to unhealthy relationships with men – plural – and “disasters” suggesting possible pregnancies.

Maybe she didn’t recall everything about that night. Maybe she felt taken advantage of while drunk and wanted to blame it on a rape-like event in her mind. Maybe she had sex while drunk with different men and was unsure of who the father was.

In bed with two men at the same time, same night suggests even a possible threesome. A wild chaotic drunk time. Chaos begets chaos. These are things of which she would be very ashamed now.

She suggests she got pregnant by two different men at different times partying while drinking heavily. Disasters – things can get crazy under those circumstances. This will become even plainer.

Scene 9:

Abortion confirmation – unborn falls out of womb bed
(Story: Ford describes how everyone in bed suddenly fell on floor)

First, with the eyes of her super unconscious constantly focused on her unborn in her womb – alive, bathing and bedded down, resting safe and secure – she has just presented vivid images of violence and death pointing toward abortion along with how she became pregnant.

Suddenly, Ford describes two men on top of a helpless victim in bed when everything falls apart. The bed can’t hold everyone – and everybody falls out of bed.

She suggests her womb home could no longer hold her unborn in its bed, with its body falling out on the floor. Immediately she has confirmed her abortion in a new way.

Her image of two larger people jumping on a small victim implies the projection secret tell: that she and the abortionist both jumped on her unborn’s body sending it to the floor. Aborted it. Confessing that her natural maternal law deep inside of her broke down as well.

But don’t miss her powerful confession. Speaking of the two powerful people mocking their victim, laughing at the victim’s plight, she points straight toward her “pro-choice” self-mocking the unborn, her unborn  – “It’s not really a baby, see.”

Even the details of her being mocked in the alleged assault with the memory seared into her “hippocampus” (in her brain) suggest symbolically that she has aborted her unborn, the fetus camped out in her womb room near her hip. And she specifically points toward her brain where her biological maternal instincts reside.

Second abortion image: Bodies on floor

Return to the chaotic scene with Ford allegedly in bed with two different men. Sudden chaos and bodies on the floor. Bodies. More than one.

Again the two different men suggest she personally had two unwanted pregnancies and two abortions. Both unborn bodies on the floor – suggesting a major tell, discarded at different times. Each one kicked out of its bed in her womb house.

As a matching reference remember she described other stresses in her life as “multifactorial,” a somewhat technical term suggesting more than one stress. This again hints at more than one abortion. 

Scene 10: 

Escape to the bathroom

Amidst the chaos, everyone falling out of bed in her story, Ford describes how this enabled her to escape to the bathroom where she locked the door. On the heels of the brutal abortion imagery, Ford offers a typical unconscious self-correction we refer to professionally as a model of rectification. She creates a picture of how she should have kept the door to her unborn’s private bath in her womb room locked and not let an abortionist in. She should have protected her unborn, allowing it to escape harm.

This again suggests her unborn’s right to privacy and its own body. Her secret wish is that she could undo her trauma. The voice of her maternal nature is heard again. She speaks of being afraid in the bathroom alluding subconsciously to her deep fear of what her abortions truly mean to her and all the women she enables.

She intentionally removed her unborn from its womb room living room where it thrives not her room at this point, removed her unborn from its private bath, not hers, from its private bed, not hers, taken her unborn out of its bedroom womb room, not hers.

Intentionally violating your unborn’s most basic rights – first to life and to its privacy, not yours, deep down your maternal nature knows you alone must answer to that internal moral compass. And you must answer to the Supreme Judge who gave it to you.

As the Scriptures imply, on that great day of answering to the Supreme Judge – He will simply pull up the shade to your super intelligence and show you your own words, decode them in your presence unless you begin to do so now.

And deep down you know it. You’ve told us in your special imagery tells, “Yes, I am terrified. Very terrified.”

Why you spontaneously reported at your testimony that you thought another contribution to your “ptsd” was “biological anxiety.” A super-intel read on your deep feminine maternal nature which you violated and continue encouraging women to violate.

Why again you thought self-punishment of jumping in front of a train would solve your problems. But it won’t.  As you put it you have a “collegial” personality and must find that with your Creator and his solution to your deep guilt. Jumping in front of a train suggests a crucifixion. Figure it out.

Next scene: Ford returns to the specific moment of her abortions. More imagery confirmation.  More desperation to get her own attention.

Scene 11:

The abortionist and me: hitting walls, playing games
(Story: Ford describes hearing the two drunk persecutors coming downstairs)

Ford’s imagery now takes us back to her womb home with major biological specificity.

She hears the bodies of the two drunk men “hitting the walls” as they go downstairs. Another aggressive act, she suggests hitting the walls of her womb home with the unborn in it. Again, it’s the abortionist downstairs in her body where her unborn lives, hitting the uterine walls, brutally ripping the amniotic sac in an abortion. Both out of control, drunk on their selfish rights.

She testifies that as she sat locked in the bathroom, “I heard Brett and Mark leave the bedroom laughing and loudly walk down the narrow stairs, pin-balling off the walls on the way down.” She depicts the two drunk assailants bouncing off the walls like pinballs. It’s a metaphor for the abortionist knocking her unborn around inside her womb like a pinball in a game machine, the little pinball unborn human being that came rolling out, treating the unborn’s life like nothing more than a game to play – getting rid of it on a whim.

Scene 12:

Running out of the house
Then Ford describes she ran out of the house. Read the tell – she had run her unborn out of its womb home. She can still see the abortionist ripping open the amniotic sac and her unborn pouring out.

And she’s still running from what she’s done – and continues to endorse aggressively. Taking an unborn’s life stays with a woman deep in her core no matter how much she denies it.

No wonder she couldn’t remember how she got home that night. She knew her unborn never got home that night either. It was gone for good. How badly she wants to bury that reality.

Ford’s powerful secret story points to her personal abortion(s) and not just those thousands she has continually enabled.

About the AuthorAndrew Hodges, M.D.

ANDREW G. HODGES, M.D., is a psychiatrist in private practice, a former clinical professor of psychiatry (UAB School of Medicine), and a noted forensic profiler. Experts including FBI agents believe his unique “thoughtprint decoding” method will one day become a fixture in law enforcement much as identifying fingerprints. The author of nine books, he has been interviewed extensively in the media with appearances on Fox News, CNN, ABC, MSNBC and Court TV. His website is AndrewGHodges.com

The post Christine Ford’s Secret Pain: Abortion “PTSD” Explains Kavanaugh Accusation appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

Dr. Christine Blasey Ford now stands before all of America in a moment of crisis, a crisis both personal and public, as she makes her accusations of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

As a psychiatrist and forensic profiler, I specialize in interviewing people at crisis moments especially in the treatment of emotional traumas including sexual abuse.

Psychiatrists have developed a brand new way of scientifically interviewing such people because we have had a tremendous breakthrough revealing a “dazzling unconscious mind” as author Malcolm Gladwell described in his book, Blink. He described how people unconsciously quick-read themselves and key situations in the blink of an eye — super perception. But as psychiatric researchers conducting hands-on therapy we learned that this brilliant super intelligence quickly reveals what it sees by speaking “between the lines” in the language of secret tells — symbolic projections, metaphors and images.

Dr. Christine Blasey Ford now stands before all of America in a moment of crisis, a crisis both personal and public, as she makes her accusations of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

As a psychiatrist and forensic profiler, I specialize in interviewing people at crisis moments especially in the treatment of emotional traumas including sexual abuse.

Psychiatrists have developed a brand new way of scientifically interviewing such people because we have had a tremendous breakthrough revealing a “dazzling unconscious mind” as author Malcolm Gladwell described in his book, Blink. He described how people unconsciously quick-read themselves and key situations in the blink of an eye — super perception. But as psychiatric researchers conducting hands-on therapy we learned that this brilliant super intelligence quickly reveals what it sees by speaking “between the lines” in the language of secret tells — symbolic projections, metaphors and images.

Is she locating, as Jesus put it “a speck in her neighbor Kavanaugh’s eye” when the real motive is the log in her eye? This is precise way Christ characterized the unconscious mind working, as does the new science of unconscious communication. The super intelligence is far more truthful and brilliant than the conscious mind. At key moments the fault in your neighbor’s eye is symbolically your own fault — a symbolic secret tell.

Consider the accusation — Kavanaugh has assaulted her. Decoding the possible secret tell — the projection tell — the truth could be that has Ford violently assaulted others and is now unconsciously projecting that assaultive behavior onto Kavanaugh.

Jesus insisted if you don’t read secret projection tells — symbolic confession language — you miss the message. In other words, decode or remain blind.

Accuser unconsciously interviews herself
Back to Ford’s secret unconscious interview — her unconscious read on herself.
We have major communications filled with hidden messages, potential secret-tell confessions.

We have a letter from Ford, a recent interview by the Washington Post and numerous behavioral tells — often expressed through her attorney who represents a clear proxy for the accuser.

The facts are that Ford has already interviewed herself in some depth. The question is what does she see and what does her symbolic language reveal.

Here is Ford’s secret tell story — and indeed, it’s full of projection confessions

First of all, her July 30 letter to U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a California Democrat, requesting anonymity reflects a strong political motive. She wants to insert herself into a political process. She accuses Kavanaugh of sexual violence towards her decades ago. Consciously, her sole reason is to establish that he should not be confirmed to become a member of the U.S. Supreme Court.

Initially, she wants to remain anonymous and denies any intent to go public. Anonymity suggests symbolically that she doesn’t want to know herself — why she’s unconsciously coming forward. She’s afraid to acknowledge her deeper motives. It’s as though she’s saying, “I don’t want you to know who I am, and I don’t want to know who I am.’

What is she hiding?

After all the raucous and inappropriate Senate Democrat attacks on Kavanaugh, Feinstein comes out with this letter causing a media hullabaloo. It’s clearly a political move designed to disrupt the Kavanaugh confirmation at the last minute, breaking the Senate rules along the way. The chief political issue is abortion. The Democrats fear that Roe vs. Wade will be overturned and abortion rights denied. Without a doubt, this is Feinstein’s deepest motive and Ford’s primary personal motive.

Playing a cat-and-mouse game, Ford and Feinstein succeed in disrupting the scheduled vote. Ford insists she will remain anonymous and not give her name but quickly joins Feinstein in the disrupting process days later. Feinstein’s and Ford’s denial confessions reveal themselves as nothing more than calculated political positioning.

Ford makes a sudden appearance in a Sept. 18 interview with The Washington Post. Telling her story of an alleged assault in more detail, her narrative is packed with secret tells indicating a hidden agenda.

But her appearance is a hit-and-run job. She will consider being interviewed by the Senate, disrupting the vote the next week. Then she changes her mind and through her attorney announces she will refuse an offer to appear before the Senate. She insists that Kavanaugh must first be investigated by FBI. She wants the vote on his confirmation postponed.

Read the secret tell — Ford needs to be investigated for her deeper motives in coming forward. She needs to be investigated by the highest law authority, herself, starting with the Senate. It’s as though she’s saying, “See, my primary motive is political.” She also suggests an absolutely unforgivable violation of the laws of human nature and God’s law.

Ford is a rule breaker par excellence, continually violating the senatorial process boundaries as do the Democrats. She, through her attorney and Feinstein as her proxies, is behaving like a very aggressive disruptive person. She reflects interpersonal attacks on senators — and on American citizens. She had multiple opportunities to come forward but waited for the dramatic effect. As Lindsay Graham called it, “a drive-by shooting” — unconsciously, a far deeper tell than he knew.

But rule-breaking patterns suggest Ford is unconsciously afraid of rules and particularly afraid of being judged. Her secret tells vividly reveals why.

The central issue for the Dems and certainly for Ford: the fear that Kavanaugh will oppose abortion rights for women.

Ford reports being worried for a long time about Kavanaugh becoming a Supreme Court judge. Her behavioral tells now and then suggest she is vastly more concerned about her abortion rights than his alleged abuse of her.

The key is not about who Brett Kavanaugh is, but what he symbolizes to Ford and the Democrats regarding abortion.

What Kavanaugh symbolizes

Now to Ford’s major behavioral tells revealing her deep unconscious fear and guilt over enabling abortions. She attended the Women’s March on Washington the day after Donald Trump’s inauguration driven by one central fear — abortion rights being overturned by the new Republican administration. Obviously preoccupied, she reportedly marched wearing a pink “Pu**y Power” hat.

She removed her social media posts, implying she has much to hide about her deepest motivations.

I have demonstrated in a previous article how the Jan. 21, 2017 Women’s March on Washington was unconsciously motivated by enormous abortion guilt.

Consciously the marchers demanded their rights, but unconsciously they confessed to depriving the unborn of the right to life

As a therapist specializing in unconscious communication, I have treated women pre- and post-abortion. I never tell them what to do nor that they were wrong. I let them tell themselves in their secret tells — projection tells.

When you actually see their unconscious mind reading them in the blink of an eye, that teaches you all your need to know about how a woman really sees abortion, deep in her soul. They always tell themselves, “I am taking a life and terribly guilty.”
A pregnant pre-abortion woman will talk destruction over and over until she recognizes her secret tell on herself. She also sees her womb as a sacred home that’s breaking down. Watch her change her own mind, take a leave from therapy to deliver, and walk back in telling you first thing, “I had that baby.” An unforgettable experience.

Or in post-abortion cases, they eventually allow their severe self-judgment and guilt to lead them to seek healing. This occurs 100 percent of the time for one reason —our unconscious possesses a natural law moral compass. This has been confirmed repeatedly with other therapists who are experts in the field of the new super intelligence.

At the women’s march, the pop star, Madonna, did the same thing. Announcing that she wanted to blow up Trump in the sacred White House, her imagery confessed to her own abortion — taking a life from her own sacred womb. Her abortion is known publicly.

Ford’s violent secret tells
We come to Ford’s secret tell projections in her letter and stories.

She presents numerous violent images which suggest her deeply buried abortion guilt. It’s the key unconscious story about why she’s coming forward. She connects coming forward to her most violent image, “annihilation.”

The Washington Post reported, “By late August, Ford had decided not to come forward, calculating that doing so would upend her life and probably would not affect Kavanaugh’s confirmation. ‘Why suffer through the annihilation if it’s not going to matter?’ she said.”

That projection tell confesses that unborn children have suffered annihilation at her hands, unconsciously upending her life. She must unload her massive guilt on Kavanaugh but knows she’s wrong to affect his confirmation. Deep down this appearance would further reveal a hidden confession publicly — a way of punishing herself.

She’s suffering from annihilation trauma — her attacks on the unborn.

Then she declares in another violent tell from her abuse allegations, “I thought he might inadvertently kill me.”

Her story of an out-of-control Kavanaugh on top of her with his friend in the room laughing as Kavanaugh and his friend roll off on the floor and start scrapping with each other as she escapes doesn’t fit the murderous image. Laughing “manically” instead suggests a teenage prank.

But inadvertently killing someone suggests unconsciously killing a helpless unborn as she and the abortionist — the two of them — carry out their maniacal event oblivious and laughing at the fact that this unborn is actually a human being.

Remember, what she’s saying is her current deeper read on the events of that night now. Importantly she recalled thinking, but again talking, about the present: “I’m not ever telling anyone this. This is nothing, it didn’t happen, and he didn’t rape me.”

She suggests strongly via her hidden confession that nothing really happened. She was fully aware that she was not raped and implies not injured physically running out of the room, later down the stairs and finally running out of the house. (Her letter stating she received “medical treatment for the assault” appears possibly manipulative. She could be referring to her 2012 medical psychiatric or psychological treatment.)

Even more strongly, her own words suggest this event “didn’t happen” — that she has made it mostly up or distorted it or remains confused as to who was who.

At the same time, she’s not telling herself consciously about her rape/assault of the unborn. Not ever telling herself. As for the Kavanaugh event, this is nothing compared to what she’s doing enabling millions of unborn deaths.

She continues, “He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.” But never did. Yet she implies her unconscious deep fear of exposure — self-awareness of what an abortion means to her surfacing.

Furthermore, Kavanaugh as a judge who might help overturn Roe vs. Wade would evoke enormous fear of exposure of her career-long violent victimization of unborns. Now her massive hidden guilt would grow even greater, far greater than any pseudo-assault by a teenager years ago.

The Post further reported, “She was terrified that she would be in trouble if her parents realized she had been at a party where teenagers were drinking, and she worried they might figure it out even if she did not tell them.”

First understand her story begins with enormous secret guilt on her part alone that night. Reading more deeply, she implies her own unconscious parental guilt over abortion — terrified that it would break into her consciousness. She has figured it all out unconsciously and is the parents on the senatorial committee and throughout the nation as to what she’s really done.

In agreeing finally to be interviewed by Congress, Ford makes the special request for assurance that she would be safe at the hearing. She’s thinking of death threats —also unconsciously of the deaths of countless unborn babies which will forever haunt her unconscious mind. Along the way, she’s simultaneously confessing that she should also make Kavanaugh safe from her attacks.

Another major tell in her story is that she depicts a violent event occurring in a house she can’t remember although she was personally there. She suggests very possibly she aborted a fetus in her own womb home or that she encouraged a close friend’s abortion. Much less the numerous other abortions she has encouraged in her marches and in her career as a therapist.

Additionally, she refers to a later period of “unhealthy relationships.” Could this include unhealthy relationships with unborns—abortions, hers or a friend’s? Unhealthy relationships suggest other powerful unresolved traumas.

Importantly, Ford never realized the alleged Kavanaugh trauma had a lasting impact on her until 2012 in psychotherapy. But easily a pro-choice therapist could miss a far greater post-traumatic stress disorder regarding abortion guilt—unconsciously displaced onto the alleged Kav incident. We know one event often covers a far deeper more powerful second trauma.

Anonymous and locked up from hidden motive
Numerous secret tells match perfectly her secret wish to keep herself from seeing her enormous guilt, remaining anonymous and unknown to herself. She’s locked up from seeing her deep-consuming guilt. Her account of the alleged incident is full of secret tell images of hiding: locked door, locking herself in a bathroom, hand over her mouth, can’t be heard yelling, didn’t talk to anyone and never told parents.

All in all, Ford’s yelling unconsciously at herself and the senatorial committee — and America — that she’s driven far and away to come forward by her guilt, not primarily Kavanaugh’s. Explaining her powerful political motive as central.

The great media myth accompanied by Dems
The mainstream media strongly supports abortion on demand — in massive denial joining people such as Dr. Ford in her denial. We see the great media myth, their secret denial tell that Ford has nothing to gain by coming forward. No hidden motives at all. The great political motive fix.

Unconsciously she has told us of her radical pro-choice attacks on the unborn. She has confessed to her enormous unconscious motivation not only to dump on Kavanaugh but stop him in the process. She completely avoids the severe guilt that’s eating her up. Now suffering from massive annihilation guilt, she can support Roe vs. Wade to keep it intact while keeping her guilt from surfacing.

In a new condition for a senate interview, Ford insists on Kavanaugh testifying first with no chance to respond to his accuser. She suggests a wish to abort his career without him speaking back—an unconscious proxy for the aborted unborn she never allows to speak.

Senators and lawyers are not trained to listen to secret tell unconscious messages and unaware of the new science. Eventually, they can learn to listen in this new day and age of the super intelligence. But for now, they should see through Ford’s cover-up trauma story and recognize her true political motive.

This political issue of pro-life vs pro-abortion is the crucial issue facing America today and the preservation of our natural law constitutional republic. The radical reactions of the media and the Dems along with Dr. Ford testify to this.

Christine Blasey Ford stands in as a proxy for liberals and the mainstream media, all run by the unconscious guilt mafia. You can run from America’s founders who insisted on the right to life per the laws of human nature. You can run from Jesus, too, along with Nature’s God, but you can’t hide forever.

This article was originally published on Freedom Outpost.

The post Christine Ford’s Secret Tells Point To Powerful, Deeper Motive appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

The key to this case can be found in Paddock’s’s unconscious mind where his motives are buried. Unable to face the deeper pain that drove his rage, Paddock himself could not tell us his real motives. Only his unconscious can do that. Few know how specifically the vast unconscious speaks, but it does.

Dr. Reid Meloy, a California-based forensic psychologist noted that mass murders normally have a grievance but he can’t figure it out or articulate it. Yet the key is knowing how to decode the unconscious. That’s what I do for a living.

From the broken window on the 32^nd floor of the Mandalay Bay hotel, Stephen Paddock was secretly telling the world just how great was his grievance.

Humans all possess a newly discovered deeper unconscious mind: a super intelligence that can speak. My job is to listen, to decipher its symbolic meaning, and use it to understand. In his best-selling book, Blink, Malcolm Gladwell described “a dazzling new unconscious” that quick-reads reality in the blink of an eye but speaks only through instincts.

But long before Blink’s publication in 2005, a genius psychiatrist discovered in therapy how clearly this “see all” super intelligence speaks verbally. It secretly patterns symbolic messages in code between the lines of conscious communication. It speaks in images, stories and projections—far brighter and faster than our conscious mind. I validated this discovery in clinical research and in my book, The Deeper Intelligence.

I also decode unconscious messages from criminals who invariably confess their guilt between the lines. This led to my new forensic profiling method, “thoughtprint decoding.”

As a therapist I decode messages from severe emotional trauma victims, people like Stephen Paddock. Such people consciously bury the real meaning of their trauma. Nevertheless, the trauma remains constantly frozen in the back of their minds. It’s as if the threat of the trauma’s reoccurrence remains there, deep in their unconscious. It’s an unconscious post-traumatic stress disorder.

Stephen Paddock tells his story in secret projections which explains his rage.

Paddocks’ imagery in his last communications to his live-in girlfriend, Marilou Danley, contained significant subliminal communication about his motives. These are crucial overlooked communications to the closest person on earth to him at the time.

After her FBI interview Danley said that Paddock told her: “I want you to take a trip home to see your family. I found a cheap ticket to the Philippines.”

Symbolically, “take a trip home to see your family” strongly implies a projection that he is unconsciously thinking about his own traumatic past home life. Just prior to mass murder, he is taking a trip down bad memory lane. Immediately this points to his horrific trauma from the sudden, totally out of the blue, family-destroying trip his bank robbing, criminal father took him on at a very early age. A trip that never ended, that he deeply buried.

Secretly he implies the shocking realization, “I was just a cheap ticket to my father, of no value, degraded by him. He was more concerned about money and robbing banks than me, and robbing me of a father.”

He also sent his girlfriend money on her trip “to buy your family a house.” Read his projection: “I deeply wished my father had bought us a permanent house, provided a stable family.”  Instead, he was deeply cheated, robbed of a home. Paddock had often nurtured kids and neighbors as he wished he had been nurtured.

Paddocks’ father-son relationship—the mental trip home where it started

A brief picture of his father-son relationship shows just how severe his wounds were— the deepest grievance imaginable he had kept secret since age 7.

Just out after six years in prison, his jailbird father married in 1952, had son Stephen in 1953 and was immediately sent back to prison on a three-year stretch. It was a total abandonment of his son. Out of jail in 1956, father and mother then moved away, changed names and began a new life. Masquerading for four years as an ideal father and husband having three more sons, his father had a generous larger-than-life side. It would have been a huge salve for Stephen’s earlier father abandonment—now he had the perfect father.

Secretly his father then committed a series of armed bank robberies. Suddenly arrested in Las Vegas during which he attempted to murder an FBI agent, his father never returned home and would never be seen again by Stephen. Overnight his idealized father was gone and serving a 20-year sentence.

Stephen age 7 experiences shocking massive father deception, total abandonment again, a violent dangerous father who carried a gun and nearly murdered. And, of course, inordinate personal shame.

Unconsciously he experiences his father as totally destroying his life—a murderous attack.

Neighbors were shocked and tried to keep the truth from Stephen, but he knew. His mother immediately moved to California and told the boys their father had died. No grieving, no father, tons of fear and shame, and instructed to keep it all secret, but Stephen knows inside. Old enough to remember the police coming to his house that fateful day. He buries his trauma deeper and deeper.

But he would always associate the moment of utter deception and final abandonment by his father with Las Vegas, Nevada.

Eventually his father escapes from prison becoming one of the ten most wanted dangerous men in America for nearly a decade. But Stephen already knew just how dangerous he could be.

Back To His Girlfriend
In the end he treated his girlfriend as his criminal father treated him. Subtly ordering his girlfriend to go away implies again how his father abandoned him, sent him away.

Then, violently abandoning her by suicide he again repeats his father’s behavior as he experienced it–a violent symbolic suicide.

His girlfriend provided another hint. Since he gave her money to buy a house for her family back home, she thought Paddock was planning to break up with her—but denied “he was planning violence against anyone.”

She consciously overlooked the violence he was preparing to inflict on her personally—stark utter abandonment through suicide. But subliminally she recognized Paddock’s unconscious violent message: he was getting ready to symbolically break up with— break—destroy—the one person who had severely abandoned and wounded him so long ago. He was looking to retaliate symbolically against his bank robbing father who had abandoned his family overnight. Her super-intel had picked up the secret.

Dragging her into the horror of his murderous behavior reveals he experienced his father’s behavior as repeat murderous attacks.

Sudden abandonment, loss of home, poverty, shame, and in the back of his mind continually a Top Ten Most Wanted dangerous father are experienced as symbolic murders deep down. Read “my father killed me in so many different ways—and my brothers and mother. Robbed us repeatedly daily.”
Just as Paddock reenacted his father’s symbolic suicide on his girlfriend, he reenacted his father’s secret murderous rage toward him on his mass murder victims that night.

When Paddock kept killing and wounding hundreds of innocent concertgoers—unconsciously he was looking at his abusive father. He shot him over and over, shouting out his unbearable unconscious secret: his father had destroyed him as if he had shot him a thousand times with his repeated abandonments and abuse. He was inflicting his deep haunting sense of being a cheap ticket on all his cheap ticket victims at the concert.

Carrying out his mass murder in Las Vegas suggests an unconscious flashback to his father’s shocking arrest in that city, the massive deception, and final abandonment. Stephen never saw him again.  His father destroyed him in Vegas and he would repay him in Vegas in a mass murder rage. Revisiting the precise moment of his father’s maximum betrayal.

Signs of Slippage

There were signs of Paddock’s regression. When he fell on something slippery in a casino in 2012 and sued, he suggests his slippery family framework that did violence to him—couldn’t hold him up any longer. He complained about a damaged hamstring suggesting how his father trauma had hamstrung him his entire life. Feeling deeply wounded and entitled he suggests he was beginning to slip mentally already. During his deposition he alluded to losing his wits. He said rarely drank alcohol when he gambled, because “at the stakes I play, you want to have all your wits about you, or as much wit as I have.”

Around 2015  he began to publicly berate his girlfriend as his father had degraded him.

In 2016 immediate family events triggered his further regression dealing with his father’s abuse: his aging mother turned 90 creating another impending “abandonment” and reminding him of his father’s great abandonment/ abuse. He also carried a deep grievance toward her for having to bury his pain and anger. And for enabling such a father.

Stephen Paddock, a man known for never getting angry, had cracked and retaliated in kind in a moment of calculated unmitigated rage. Just as his father was constantly calculating another crime, another robbery—toying with his family over and over.

Final explosion: ‘Feel my pain’
Paddock’s final explosion is a symbolic behavioral confession and story of motives—of his deep grievances. It’s a story of severe father-son abuse at a level we cannot comprehend. Paddock made others feel his severe pain to avoid his own unconscious pain. He massacred strangers as he felt massacred by his father—it was that severe deep down.

He also identified with his father described as “a larger-than-life outlaw.” Paddock both surpassed his father in his rage—“a larger than life mass murderer outlaw”—to shame his father in return and to punish himself for doing so simultaneously.

This is Stephen Paddock’s story: Father destroyed/murdered him deep down. He wanted to murder father as payback. He then re-enacted it on others and finally suicided because of guilt. The great abuse three-step. It’s so powerful, only the unconscious super intelligence can tell us the truth about it in its metaphoric messages.

He’s still responsible but understanding tells us why he exploded.

The post Steven Paddock’s Motives: Father-son relationship gone horribly bad appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

In this eye-opening study of one of the 21st century’s most controversial murder cases, Dr. Hodges also cites passages from Amanda’s memoir, Waiting to Be Heard, to corroborate the confession found in the Nov. 4 email.

The post Profiling Amanda Knox appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

The police are investigating the murder of a young woman. They bring three people in for questioning, two males and one female. All claim to be innocent. After hours of questioning the suspects are released. The female goes home and types into the wee hours of the morning. She creates a spontaneous five page email alibi. She writes that she has to “get this off my chest.” She sends it off to approximately 25 people. Her email is addressed to “everyone” and describes her “account” of the last time she saw the murder victim. She writes that as she was “fumbling around the kitchen” when the victim appeared with “blood dripping down her chin.” Afterwards she and her boyfriend did a lot of mopping and cleaning up because they “spilled a lot of water on the floor. “

Later an autopsy would reveal that the murder victim sustained multiple cuts and bruises to her face and neck area by a kitchen knife. As the victim lay dying, a pool of blood spread out on the floor. The blood had been cleaned up afterwards, mopped up, by the homicidal maniacs who had killed her.

A practicing psychotherapist and nationally recognized forensic profiler named Andrew Hodges M.D, has written a new book, As Done Unto You, which decodes the hidden messages in the verbal and written statements of the murder suspects in the Meredith Kercher murder case. Dr. Hodges uses a “cutting-edge forensic profiling technique of thoughtprint decoding by accessing the deeper intelligence (unconscious mind) of suspects in criminal investigations.”

He writes on his website, ”I have learned that the human mind works simultaneously on two levels—consciously and unconsciously. The discovery of an unconscious super intelligence [super-intel] reveals that it reads situations in the blink of an eye and invariably tells the complete truth.”

In As Done Unto You he starts with a brief introduction to his methodologies followed by a hypothetical version of events based on the evidence and his findings. He reveals what unfolded the night Meredith Kercher was gang raped and slaughtered in her bedroom. His narration is graphic and has the ring of truth. Hodge’s comprehensive knowledge of this case including some lesser known facts renders his retelling as one of the most profound to date.

We know the who, what, where, when, how of Meredith’s murder so all that is left is the why, and this is what Dr. Hodges brilliantly addresses in his book. Investigators scrambled to find a motive or an immediate trigger(s) provoking Amanda Knox, Raffaele Sollecito and Rudy Guede to rape and stab Meredith Kercher to death. Prosecutors debated over whether it was it a fight over Amanda Knox’s slovenly habits, indiscriminate sex life, or was it a robbery gone wrong? Hodges answers this riddle unequivocally in his book based on the murder suspects own statements.

Hodges explains, “Unquestionably there would have been two types of motives. Immediate trigger motives and far deeper time-bomb motives which caused such distorted thinking consciously.” (Hodges MD, Andrew G. (2015-06-23). As Done Unto You: The Secret Confession of Amanda Knox (Kindle Locations 740-741). Village House Publishers. Kindle Edition.) There is most likely a list of provocations resulting from the quickly deteriorating relationship between Amanda and Meredith which was witnessed by many. Ultimately it appears that it was Meredith’s rejection of Knox on October 31st that set things off.

On Halloween night in 2007, Knox in her cat costume walked aimlessly around Perugia for hours – alone. She kept texting Meredith over and over to try and meet up with her. Meredith was having fun, partying with her friends and ignored Knox’s persistent texts. This rejection and abandonment on top of a series of earlier clashes with her roommate, unleashed the beast in Amanda – the repressed rage stemming from her early life traumas.

As Hodges explains, “Criminals are typically controlled by deeply buried unconscious emotional trauma which they re-enact on their victims. It’s well-documented that abuse victims often themselves become abusers.”

After the crime is relived in the first two chapters, the author then delves deeply into the inner world of the murderers unconscious. Analyzing their words, Hodges takes the reader through all of the reasons Amanda, Raffaele and Rudy found each other, their shared emotional baggage. All three had upheavals in their early life which brought them together and the toxic combination exploded into a group assault that went too far.

Hodges includes an intriguing and insightful description of the deeper meanings within photographs taken in the months leading up to the crime. This is followed by a methodical and intense study of the murder suspects writing in the rest of the book. In particular he focuses on Amanda Knox’s writing.

Dr. Hodges’s book is dense and full of observations which reveal much more than any other book about this case. Some of the insights that he discovers through thoughtprints include:

• “ . . . [Knox] suggests they initially entered Meredith’s bedroom “together,” like storm troopers, to carry out maximum humiliation. This never started out as a one-on-one catfight.”(Hodges MD, Andrew G. (2015-06-23). As Done Unto You: The Secret Confession of Amanda Knox (Kindle Locations 243). Village House Publishers. Kindle Edition.)

• “Amanda also implies . . .that she and Raffael both penetrated Meredith— as did Rudy Guede, whose DNA was found inside her. It was a gang assault. “Came out” suggests lesbian activity on Amanda’s part. In a later writing, Amanda will recall how people thought she was a lesbian in high school.” (Hodges MD, Andrew G. (2015-06-23). As Done Unto You: The Secret Confession of Amanda Knox (Kindle Locations 3630-3633). Village House Publishers. Kindle Edition.)

• “[Knox’s] super-intel continues to highlight motives – first the immediate trigger motives. Evidence clearly indicates Amanda had significant conflicts with Meredith, and she outright lied about those disagreements. Meredith’s parents, friends and roommates, however, knew about them.” (Hodges MD, Andrew G. (2015-06-23). As Done Unto You: The Secret Confession of Amanda Knox (Kindle Location 3132). Village House Publishers. Kindle Edition.)

• Amanda certainly knew her parents were married on February 21, 1987, with her mother five months pregnant before Amanda’s birth on July 9. 1987. That meant she was conceived around October 9, 1986. Her utterly brilliant super-intel would have figured out in a heartbeat that it was sometime in November 1986 when they considered the abortion. That month would have had special significance to her and evoked an enormous unconscious anniversary reaction marking her near-death.” (Hodges MD, Andrew G. (2015-06-23). As Done Unto You: The Secret Confession of Amanda Knox (Kindle Location 4747). Village House Publishers. Kindle Edition.)

Over and over again, Dr. Hodges uncovers the distressing realities surrounding that night. Hodges work is truly groundbreaking. As if all of this weren’t enough, in the final chapters he includes the super-intel study of one of Knox’s most prominent supporters, Nina Burleigh, uncovering what she says in between the lines of her own writing.

As Done Unto You is a fascinating, intense and thought provoking look at the truth as only a psychiatrist and FBI profiler with a firm understanding of the Super Intelligence technique could reveal.

Thoughtprint decoding has proven to be an invaluable tool in criminal investigations. Similar to when DNA was first introduced, some people may be circumspect about it however in time it will prove to become critical in solving cases like the murder of Meredith Kercher.

Unfortunately, the Meredith Kercher murder case has been closed and due to the inability of the Italian legal system to confidently identify the multiple attackers, two of the three suspects have been acquitted. Hopefully Dr. Hodges thoughtprints become a part of future murder investigations like this one so that victims families get the closure and justice they deserve.

The post Dr. Andrew G. Hodges proves that Amanda Knox is guilty in his new book appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

A practicing psychotherapist and nationally recognized forensic profiler named Andrew Hodges M.D, has written a new book, As Done Unto You – The Secret Confession of Amanda Knox, which decodes the hidden messages in the verbal and written statements of the murder suspects in the Meredith Kercher murder case. Dr. Hodges uses a “cutting-edge forensic profiling technique of thoughtprint decoding by accessing the deeper intelligence (unconscious mind) of suspects in criminal investigations.”

Hodges notes, “I have learned that the human mind works simultaneously on two levels—consciously and unconsciously. The discovery of an unconscious super intelligence [super-intel] reveals that it reads situations in the blink of an eye and invariably tells the complete truth.”

Podcast Interview: New York Crime Examiner (True Crime writer Liz Houle)

The post Hodges explains his decoding in Knox case Podcast Interview: New York Crime Examiner appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

BTK Serial Killer Case: Dr. Hodges was on the verge of being brought into the BTK case (2005), at the encouragement of former Wichita Police Chief Richard LaMunyon, immediately prior to BTK’s capture. From limited communication from the killer, he was the only profiler to predict that BTK was on the verge of murdering again (after twenty years)—a fact to which the killer confessed after his arrest.

Natalee Holloway Case: Joran van der Sloot confessed in an undercover interview to the exact scenario Dr. Hodges described earlier in his book on the case. He talked of placing her body in a friend’s boat where it was dumped into the ocean.

The post Accurate Predictions by Thoughtprint Decoding appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

The post Casey Anthony Forensic Profile appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

The unconscious mind communicates constantly and typically hides its messages in verbal or written communication generated by the conscious mind. We don’t always say what we mean. These unconscious communications are what we call thoughtprints.

To understand thoughtprints and discern what is really being said we must pay attention to the big idea, not necessarily the literal idea. Pay attention to the subject a person introduces. The subject may introduce it through denial: “There are no sharks on the island.” Or by linking it to someone else: “Beverly was talking about seeing the sharks.” The key idea in this case is “sharks.” By paying close attention to the big ideas we get a clear idea what subject matter is on the speaker’s mind.

Every idea introduced must be taken as an unconscious part of them: ADD ONE WORD Consider they are unconsciously talking about themselves. In the above case the key thoughtprint “sharks” could suggest that the speaker is confessing he is the shark.

How are thoughtprints used?

Various types of communications can be profiled to reveal any subconcious messages that are contained in them. Communication can be oral or written. Typical communications are: ransom notes, letters, suicide notes, police interrogations, etc.

Thoughtprint decoding can also be useful in a defense case. The subconscious can also give clues to innocence.

The post What is a “Thoughtprint?” appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..