Dr. Christine Ford now puts her accusation of Judge Brett Kavanaugh before America front and center.

In so doing, the words of Jesus confront her—and America—with a warning: be careful of the very flaw you so clearly see in Judge Kavanaugh, it may well be the log in your eye. Beware the unconscious log in your eye which you may be so eager to project onto another. Jesus implied to Dr. Ford that ‘You possess a deeper law of human nature, a moral compass, deep in your subconscious by which you read yourself so quickly—this compass is so accurate that it will make your head swim.’

See his use of symbolic language secret ‘tells’—the log in your eye, you are the very neighbor you accuse. You are looking in the mirror. Decode—read—your secret tell language. This is how your unconscious speaks at key moments like the Senate hearings; indeed this is a key moment for America.

In his utter brilliance and brevity, using “his log in the eye” metaphor, Jesus put before the world His instincts about the unconscious super-intelligence and defined its unique symbolic language. The very brilliant unconscious waiting to be discovered when it was, finally in 1973. I was in on that discovery early and validated it with years of clinical research.

The issue is we have: Party A (Dr. Ford) accusing Party B (Kavanaugh) of sexually assaulting her. In the projection “log in your eye” paradigm we ask, “Dr. Ford, could you be unconsciously, unknowingly confessing that you have seriously assaulted another (or maybe several human beings) in matters totally unrelated to Judge Kavanaugh? Are you now also unconsciously scapegoating him to relieve your own guilt?”

She reports early on, “I don’t have all the answers, and I don’t remember as much as I would like to,” adding that “the details about that night…I will never forget.”’ But suppose she’s merged details of another night when she inflicted severe trauma on someone else. We will see other references to memory gaps. She will tell us she never processed the matter at the time in 1982, but primarily avoided it for years, making it a rich minefield for further distortion.

To be clear, a person can strongly find fault with another person but be passionately mistaken on the facts. Did the Democrats on the committee, or the mainstream left-leaning media, ever once consider that powerful, unconscious motivations could be coloring Ford’s testimony? This indeed is a shame because Dr. Ford’s “dazzling new unconscious” tells a powerful deeper story of major projection onto Kavanaugh.

In her Senate testimony, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford tells two stories simultaneously–one conscious and one unconscious. Yet she has no conscious idea of doing so. Do the stories match? No. She tells a far more compelling unconscious story guided by her super-intelligence, again the “dazzling new unconscious” which reads a person’s truth in the blink of an eye and speaks in projection images.

As a practicing psychiatrist for more than 40 years, I’ve had extensive experience in decoding the unconscious. I’ve also taught my method to psychiatry residents in a medical center as I supervised their psychotherapy cases. In 1995, I wrote a book about this discovery, The Deeper Intelligence.

As a therapist and training as a physician, I treat sexual abuse victims. I’ve often helped post-abortion women heal from the inner pain and guilt they experience because of their abortions. I’ve helped women who think they want an abortion to understand how they tell themselves deep down that such a decision destroys their unborn’s life.

This is how I decode, how I help people heal, how I solve criminal cases as a forensic profiler being guided by a person’s super-intel. I repeat the story they are trying to tell themselves, yet in decoded terms, trying to find the truth that might set them free.

Even a quick look at her September 27 testimony before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee reveals that Christine Ford is dealing with a major traumatic event fixated in her psyche. But it’s not primarily the one her conscious mind thinks. Her super-intel is reading her in real time, moment by moment, trying to uncover the unconscious truth.

Republican senators’ secret tell to themselves
In taking Ford’s testimony, the Republican senators called in an expert rape prosecutor, and that decision itself revealed unconsciously that they are not trained interviewers who can look more deeply into the matter. The message from their own collective super-intel was we need someone who can really help us get to the full truth – someone who can read unconscious messages. Instinctively they know Ford would communicate unconsciously.

They need a new mind expert who can read the messages Ford’s super-intel is delivering with its super perception and super communication. Like all of us, the senators have a lot to learn from the new unconscious. They can learn to read symbolic projection language—secret tells.

Again, notice how all the Democratic senators believed Ford’s conscious story. So did much of the media. They are unaware of the new unconscious super-intel and secret tells—how you get to the deeper story. But this is the very last thing the Dems want – deeper motives, deeper story—especially one that reinforces their political agenda against the protection of the unborn. It’s as though they’re saying, “How dare you interrupt the courageous Dr. Ford’s conscious story without a whiff of hidden deeper motives?”

We will see how far from the truth this is and later in a future article how the Democratic senators on the committee demonstrated their own super- intel read on themselves. Their blind adherence to Ford’s conscious story, reveals how they are degrading themselves and the moral compass undergirded by America’s natural law.

As we examine Ford’s Senate testimony, we see that she is unconsciously interviewing herself. Again, her super-intel is the secret reporter presenting her cohesive hidden story in a plethora of revealing images as I mentioned in my previous article.

I will separate her obvious conscious messages from her unconscious ones.

Central motive: Reading through Dr. Ford’s denials

Immediately she says, “I’m not here today because I want to be. I am terrified.”

Denial confessions are often a key part of the story—especially log in your eye stories. You decode by reading through the denial. On the surface, she states that she doesn’t want to be here, but the deeper message is this: “I very much want to be here with my secret agenda, which is why I wrote my letter in the first place. I also am terrified of being here and very divided, but my wish to be here is by far the strongest.” We will learn why she is unconsciously terrified.

Another blatant denial – “I am not political” – means exactly the opposite. In fact, she is deeply politically motivated. Her behavioral tells such as participating in the anti-Trump Women’s March of January 21, 2017, reflect this strongly. She is a strong pro-choice advocate for abortion on demand. This is a major key to her comments completely challenging the notion she has no motive other than purity. But for Dr. Ford, politics are very personal.

Next, we hear another denial, fundamentally an overt lie: “It’s not my responsibility to determine whether Kavanaugh deserves to sit on the Supreme Court.” When she declares, “I am here because I believe it is my civic duty” that duty is precisely to prevent his selection. Her strongest unconscious civic duty is to prevent the selection of a conservative judge who might overturn Roe vs Wade. Once more she will tell just how personal a matter abortion is to her and why a pro-life justice would terrify her.

In the process, she also unconsciously instructs the committee to do the responsible thing by refusing to endorse her testimony—especially to understand her hidden story.

Consider another prior denial she made, essentially saying, “I did not intend my letter to go public and wanted to remain anonymous.” Look how determined she was to go public. She contacted The Washington Post on her own. Going public was her unconscious secret plan all along. She’d have to make a public appearance if she wanted to make an impact – and indeed she did. Unconsciously she delayed her plan until the last minute for maximum effect. Most of all she needs to tell her deeper story to the world.

Instruction on how to listen to super intelligence secret tells

Her brilliant super-intel confesses to hidden communication, “A reporter snuck into her class. I thought it was a student at first.” In other words, she’s secretly reporting on herself. The super-intel repeatedly tries to announce its presence. It especially presents educational message markers – here a reporter disguised as a student suggests powerfully, “Be a student, senators. Learn about my unconscious messages.”

She then adds to the message specifically how to do it. She speaks of sending “encrypted” messages to the Washington Post reporter. Read the tell– her unconscious is reporting things about her in an encrypted symbolic confession. She instructs the senators and America to decode her unconscious reads on herself now.

She continues to unconsciously instruct on how to listen. Her reference to being a diver and a member of the diving team at the club pool during the summer of the alleged assault suggests, “Read deeper; hear my deepest story.” She’s unknowingly confessing that “I’m ‘taking a dive’ for the Democrats’ primary cause at this moment in history – abortion rights on demand.

But above all, Ford’s running from her secret guilt, as we shall see.

Again her central emotional trauma—abortion guilt

She now addresses her primary unconscious emotional trauma. She linked the primary reason for coming forward in August in her unconscious message and denial confession to the Washington Post, when she asked the rhetorical question, “Why suffer through the annihilation if it’s not going to matter?” That projection implies that unborn children have suffered annihilation at her hands, unconsciously upending her life. At that point, violent abortion imagery leaped off the pages of her story. HeHHr unconscious imagery patterns presented a cohesive deeper abortion story. A story I have heard many times.

Now in her Senate testimony, Ford’s super-intel presents even more violent abortion imagery in a stunning unconscious validation of her previous story. That’s a hallmark of the super-intel – it will repeat the same story over and over, to be heard in different ways.

Early in her testimony, she again links the idea of her coming forward to blame Kavanaugh, “to jumping in front of a train headed down the track anyway and be personally annihilated.” In other words, her primary abortion guilt motive is running over an unborn like a train, annihilating them. In turn, she feels so guilty that she’s considers punishing herself such as by jumping in front of a train.

Note the key marker “personally annihilated” suggesting strongly she was very personally involved. Suggests “I personally annihilated an unborn.” Either an extremely close friend or very likely she herself underwent an abortion. In her work as a therapist and as a political activist, Ford has personally enabled many more women to abort their babies. There is no wrong more primal than a mother taking her child’s life. Ford informs us unconsciously she knows full well life begins at conception. Her super-intel specializes in detailed imagery.

She also describes how the life-destroying “train [is] headed on down the track anyway.” Unknowingly she secretly announces, “I plan to continue my strong pro-abortion activities.” Bear in mind that Ford reportedly works as a consultant to a pharmaceutical firm that manufactures the abortifacient medication known as the morning-after pill. As such, Ford indirectly enables thousands of abortions.

Violent images continue. She repeats in her testimony that she feared “being inadvertently killed by Kavanaugh.” Again she repeats she was fearful of being raped but clearly was not. That’s a powerful hint of an abortion assault – a total life-destroying rape of the unborn. She references “death threats,” someone threatening her life and that of her family, multiple death references. Read the projection, “I made severe death threats and in very real ways carried them out on unborn babies.”

We note that Brett Kavanaugh did not personally annihilate her, push her in front of a train, kill her, rape her, physically hurt her or threaten her with death. These images are hers and hers alone emanating from her all-seeing super-intel that is reading her deepest motives in public before this Senate hoping they will catch on.

It’s really a basic confession of her primary motive: Claiming Kavanaugh did violence to her but actually admitting that she has done violence to the unborn.

We find several less violent and more disguised abortion images, but they clearly fit with her unconscious confession. Such seemingly innocent images of being a “bystander” and “100 percent certainty” of Kavanaugh’s identity and guilt points again to standing by when an abortion occurs. Again, she suggests that she has enabled numerous abortions and plans to continue doing so in the future. Her image of “100 percent” certainty implies absolute awareness of her guilt and secret identity: pro-abortion activist.

Womb-home images

Deep down, all women see their womb as a protective house. Women who abort invariably talk about flawed or destroyed houses. Again Dr. Ford repeats her previous story filled with images of houses, secret key references to her guilt.

She particularly confirms her confession now today linking death to a house, her house specifically. Reportedly due to death threats “we had to move out of our house”—suggesting just as she moved an unborn from her womb. “Family was separated” as she separated an unborn from her womb.

We will see other images of houses coming up as we explore her testimony further. The reader can reflect on the numerous references to houses which she presents in her story. There she will strongly suggest exactly what set her off in 2012 to begin a potential anti-Kavanaugh campaign. We will pick up on that in the next article as we slowly process Ford’s testimony. Image by image. Tell by tell. Confession by confession.

Conclusion:

In my informed opinion, Ford is publicly confessing to the U.S. Senate and America that her motives are primarily political and that her most powerful emotional trauma is unrelated to Brett Kavanaugh. Again, she confesses her primary driver is her deep guilt which is now in real time the major source of her terror.

She’s projecting her abortion guilt onto Judge Kavanaugh as a result of her continued victimization of numerous unborns and very possibly her own deep personal trauma.

Along the way, she reveals her true intent to make sure the next Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court will be someone who would not overturn Roe v. Wade. That would personally terrify her beyond belief. It would doubly clarify in her mind she has violated the hallowed laws of maternal nature.

In her demands for an FBI investigation of Kavanaugh, consider yet another projection. Read, somebody please look for my deeper motives and help me see the emotional trauma that haunts and terrifies me.

The post Christine Ford’s Secret Unconscious ‘Tells’ Continue Before The Senate – Part One appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

The focus on Ford’s body language by several analysts draws attention to the subconscious. By extension it points to the dazzling new unconscious – the super intelligence – and its new unconscious “mind language,” a verbal language of symbolic tells which communicates in far greater detail than body language. The super-intel offers the possibility of learning so much more about crucial situations such as Ford’s testimony – reading her in the blink of an eye.

It isn’t easy to shift focus from literal communication and learn the new unconscious mind language. A comparison to body language can help. While body language communicates symbolically by arranging physical positions, facial expressions and hand gestures, the super-intel communicates verbally using symbolic imagery. It unconsciously arranges sentences rich in images – secret tells – revealed in a certain order.

It communicates new information beyond denial and coverup. But as with body language, super-intel messages must be decoded. Invariably, as the decoding moves forward, patterns emerge which tell a coherent overall story.

As a practicing psychiatrist for more than 35 years, I’ve had extensive experience in decoding the unconscious. I wrote a book about the newly discovered super-intel, The Deeper Intelligence. I am a physician and therapist. I treat sexual abuse victims. I’ve often helped post-abortion women heal from the inner pain and guilt they experience because of their abortions. I’ve taught women who think they want an abortion how to allow their super-intel’s violent imagery to show them they’re destroying a life…and I  watched them change their mind.

Now consider the high-stakes context in the U.S. Senate prior to Ford’s testimony: the Democrats were lawlessly attempting to overthrow the Constitution and prevent a pro-life justice from confirmation – and it was all around a single issue: abortion. They harbor a deep fear of Roe v. Wade being overturned.

Christine Ford’s initial major tell can easily be decoded. When she said, “I’m coming forward to do my civic duty,” what was her major civic duty in life prior to coming forward? She was a dedicated abortion-on-demand activist. She marched in her local version of the Women’s March the day after Donald Trump’s inauguration. Yet, as her all-knowing, truth-telling super-intel suggests, her real civic duty is to put an end to the horror of legalized abortion in America once and for all.

In two previous articles, I outlined my earlier decoding of Ford’s testimony:

• Christine Ford’s Secret Tells Point To Powerful, Deeper Motive
• Christine Ford’s Secret Unconscious ‘Tells’ Continue Before The Senate – Part One

I’ve shown how Ford unconsciously presented violent projection images linked to Kavanaugh’s alleged assault which fit with abortion – her assault of the unborn – and not Kavanaugh. These included: “being personally annihilated,” jumping in front of a train suggesting mutilation, “accidentally killed,” not allowed to breathe, a suffocated victim and brutally raped.

Again, deep down all pregnant women see their womb as a protective house for the unborn – biologically, that’s precisely what it is. Women who abort invariably link it to destruction to houses and protective enclosures. Ford referred to death threats to her personal home, having to move out. She spontaneously added “the family was separated” implying again permanent separation from her unborn child.

All in all, Ford’s unconsciously confessing her primary motive – blaming Kavanaugh to escape her own overwhelming, self-punishing guilt. Claiming Kavanaugh’s violence to her caused her a lifelong trauma, she admits her personal violence on her own unborn was the true cause of her post-traumatic suffering.

From scene to scene, Ford’s story accusing Kavanaugh centers around events in houses. We return to her testimony (repeated in a Washington Post interview) paying close attention to her images, her secret symbolic tells. Step by step she takes us through her secret story. Never taking her eyes off her unborn in her womb home she aborted after an unexpected pregnancy.

Her symbolic imagery reveals a powerful story – like a parable that must be decoded – of what her abortion looked like to her and why she remains fixated in an unconscious post-traumatic stress disorder.

Scene 1: Living at home

Ford starts her story by recalling when she lived at her parents’ home as a 15-year-old. That preamble established a specific foundation.  She’s underlining the most basic rule of life starting with her own right to life in her mother’s womb, her absolute right to her own life. Her mother honored that inviolate right throughout her pregnancy as did Ford’s father. They had already named her while she was yet unborn.

In her Senate testimony, Ford’s confessing precisely what she should have done for herunborn. Thus, she reveals her deep maternal rule that an unborn pre-eminently has a home and a life in the womb.

She indicates that the rules of the home – her own room, her own life in the family home – started in the womb. Over and over, she witnessed her parents acknowledging her right to her own life, her privacy rights in her own room – for example, by telling her two brothers to stay out of her room, to knock before they came in. She will repeat this message in multiple secret images in her brief story.

Unknowingly she speaks for all unborns in their mother’s womb and all unborns who have been aborted. She still fully understands that her unborn baby should have been protected – allowed to grow up as she did. See my right, “I got to grow up.” The power of her first scene speaks the guiding wisdom of the most basic maternal compass.

SCENE 2
How I got pregnant: Rules broken– Terrified

Ford’s super-intel quickly informs us how she got pregnant, her eyes ever on her unborn. Her detailed imagery symbolically confesses that she knowingly violated her parents’ wisdom by going to another party with boys, recklessly drank freely and – after casual sex – became unexpectedly pregnant.

In her testimony, Ford frankly revealed that she had attended “notorious parties,” parties far wilder than the relatively calm party which took place the night of the alleged Kavanaugh assault.

From the beginning, Ford’s super-intel is saying, “I am really talking about another party and my true post-traumatic trauma: aborting my unexpected unborn child.”

Recently, reported stories from her high-school annuals and college acquaintancesconfirm Ford’s teenage promiscuity, heavy drinking, and drug use. They depict ayoung woman nearly blacking out and wrecking cars.

One witness, who attended the University of North Carolina named D.C. McAllister, recently posted on Twitter: “Christine Blasey Ford was a classmate of mine at UNC. We graduated in 1988. I want to ask Christine if she remembers partying at Trolls, drinking at He’s Not Here. Hooking up with guys at Henderson Street. Eating at Time Out. Remember those days, Christine?”

When Christine violated her parents’ rule she points symbolically to the intrinsic maternal law she violated. Her imagery is a secret tell: “I broke my unborn’s life, I aborted its life” – the deepest, most protective instinct in her body.

Describing to the Washington Post how “terrified” she was of violating her parents’ rules by going to the unsupervised party, points unconsciously to a far greater terror. She and her female friends bragged in their high-school annuals over three years – 1982-83-84 – about violating parental rules.

She has a deep terror over violating the maternal laws of her unborn’s life, God’s laws, life-giving laws deep inside her which she’s never owned but knows to her super-intel core – and continues encouraging other women to violate.

Her huge secret tell with which she opened her testimony, “I am terrified,” speaks volumes. We all answer to the Supreme Judge as our founders called him in the Declaration of Independence. That’s the true source of her terror and trauma.

Scene 3

The house, the womb home – massive denial
(Story: no recall of where, when, and transportation to party)

Ford arrives at the party house, the house at center stage.  She can’t recall where it was, when it was, how she got there and how she got home. Her super-intel communicating the feminist code about how to handle an unwanted careless pregnancy – massive denial.

In other words, she’s saying, “I don’t recognize my womb as a home for this unborn – where it is, that it really exists in my body, when it happened, how it got there or how it got home. Because it never got to stay in its home – when I aborted its life. It’s not a human unborn. Just some kind of little tissue. Just a thing.”

That’s the typical feminist mantra – abortion means you never have to say you’re sorry to your unborn baby because it never existed. You don’t have to remember where the party was you had sex, when you had it, how you got there (or home), or even that you got pregnant because you don’t really have a womb home for your unborn, it’s all yours.  Live in denial your unborn you aborted never got to stay home in your womb.

Memory deficits regarding the location of the party house, when it happened or how she arrived or got home also suggest a near blackout at the party at which Ford got pregnant, consistent with her prior history. 

One fact Ford remembered from the alleged party was drinking a single beer. Her denial – “I was not drunk” – can be decoded as an admission that on the night she got pregnant “I was very drunk.” Her story confirms this.

Scene 4:

Party – more denial and hiding

Next scene – a party going on at the house. Ford suggests another form of typical denial by which feminists handle the reality of eliminating unborns. Party baby, party hardy. “Manic partying” in the face of hidden depressive guilt. Think of the Women’s March on Jan 22, 2016 in which Ford participated. Women chanting “F*ck Trump,” singing, demanding, threatening with overt violence on display. It was group-think at its finest to cope with the unconscious stress of sending unborns away from their womb home.

Scene 5:

The womb room – first the living room of the unborn
(Story: Ford responds to specific inquiry: memory of party house)

Asked by the senatorial rape prosecutor at her testimony what she specifically recalled about the house that night of the party, Ford described very particular rooms. Secretly she presents rich images of how a womb room is an unborn’s home – and what happened to her unborn.

“Living room” is a rich image suggesting first “life, alive” – her living womb where Ford gave life to her unborn – for a while.

Unconsciously she vividly recalls “The Living Room” womb, her unborn alive and thriving. Its central room where it lived, where it should have been allowed to keep living.  Where she would have fed it constantly growing on its own, alive and well. Allowed to play and tumble in her womb, communicate with her by kicking her at times, knocking on the uterine wall. (Remember that image.)

Deep down she can still see her unborn in its own living room womb room. How well “living room” matches perfectly Ford’s opening image suggesting where she began her life living in her mother’s womb room.

The laws of maternal nature are cited again. Your unborn has the right to live however and whenever it arrived in your womb home. The entire womb is the unborn’s living room.

Scene 6:

The bathroom – unborn’s private bath

The next room she recalls is the upstairs bathroom, a private bathroom in the party house. Her secret tell: her womb was her unborn’s private bath where it bathed in the amniotic fluid, where you let the unborn bathe and thrive by drawing nutrients. She’s painting a super-intel picture of the law of maternal nature.

Unknowingly Ford can still see in the back of her mind that vivid picture of her unborn surrounded in its private bath of amniotic fluid in her womb. A very similar picture every mother has of her young baby taking a bath in the bathtub after its born.

Ford’s cohesive secret story continues – image after image.

Scene 7:

The Womb – Where the unborn beds down and sleeps and bedroom

Then Ford recalls three more specifics: a bedroom and a bed and a nearby bathroom. First, her womb home was her unborn’s constant bedroom where it bedded down, slept in its own womb bed. See how well the imagery fits, again emphasizing the law of maternal nature – the baby has the right to continually bed down in her womb house.

Going upstairs to a bedroom also suggests a newborn baby’s own literal room – a common special room in the home. The baby’s room.

Later in life, Ford would deliver two living children with all these memories she missed with her unborn child. We can be sure they would remind her of her unborn.

Scene 8:

The womb:  How I got pregnant, why I enable abortions, why accused Kavanaugh
(Story: Ford reports Kavanaugh assault in bedroom with Mark Judge present)

Step back. This is the key scene of violence where Ford accused Kavanaugh of assault. It’s an important scene suggesting her pregnancy and abortion. We continue reading her story as a projection.

She has set her story up with stunning images of an unborn living in her womb.

Now in the bedroom, she suggests where she got pregnant with her unborn.

She describes a very chaotic scene – events in bed with two different men in one night in the same bed both very drunk. First alone with one, the other jumps on the bed on top of the two, then gets off shortly jumps back on top and chaos ensues.

First, she suggests she got pregnant by one man while both were very drunk. Far more than one beer.  A man who did take her clothes off. Her history of drinking heavily, using drugs and promiscuity has been reported by former classmates. She even admitted to unhealthy relationships with men – plural – and “disasters” suggesting possible pregnancies.

Maybe she didn’t recall everything about that night. Maybe she felt taken advantage of while drunk and wanted to blame it on a rape-like event in her mind. Maybe she had sex while drunk with different men and was unsure of who the father was.

In bed with two men at the same time, same night suggests even a possible threesome. A wild chaotic drunk time. Chaos begets chaos. These are things of which she would be very ashamed now.

She suggests she got pregnant by two different men at different times partying while drinking heavily. Disasters – things can get crazy under those circumstances. This will become even plainer.

Scene 9:

Abortion confirmation – unborn falls out of womb bed
(Story: Ford describes how everyone in bed suddenly fell on floor)

First, with the eyes of her super unconscious constantly focused on her unborn in her womb – alive, bathing and bedded down, resting safe and secure – she has just presented vivid images of violence and death pointing toward abortion along with how she became pregnant.

Suddenly, Ford describes two men on top of a helpless victim in bed when everything falls apart. The bed can’t hold everyone – and everybody falls out of bed.

She suggests her womb home could no longer hold her unborn in its bed, with its body falling out on the floor. Immediately she has confirmed her abortion in a new way.

Her image of two larger people jumping on a small victim implies the projection secret tell: that she and the abortionist both jumped on her unborn’s body sending it to the floor. Aborted it. Confessing that her natural maternal law deep inside of her broke down as well.

But don’t miss her powerful confession. Speaking of the two powerful people mocking their victim, laughing at the victim’s plight, she points straight toward her “pro-choice” self-mocking the unborn, her unborn  – “It’s not really a baby, see.”

Even the details of her being mocked in the alleged assault with the memory seared into her “hippocampus” (in her brain) suggest symbolically that she has aborted her unborn, the fetus camped out in her womb room near her hip. And she specifically points toward her brain where her biological maternal instincts reside.

Second abortion image: Bodies on floor

Return to the chaotic scene with Ford allegedly in bed with two different men. Sudden chaos and bodies on the floor. Bodies. More than one.

Again the two different men suggest she personally had two unwanted pregnancies and two abortions. Both unborn bodies on the floor – suggesting a major tell, discarded at different times. Each one kicked out of its bed in her womb house.

As a matching reference remember she described other stresses in her life as “multifactorial,” a somewhat technical term suggesting more than one stress. This again hints at more than one abortion. 

Scene 10: 

Escape to the bathroom

Amidst the chaos, everyone falling out of bed in her story, Ford describes how this enabled her to escape to the bathroom where she locked the door. On the heels of the brutal abortion imagery, Ford offers a typical unconscious self-correction we refer to professionally as a model of rectification. She creates a picture of how she should have kept the door to her unborn’s private bath in her womb room locked and not let an abortionist in. She should have protected her unborn, allowing it to escape harm.

This again suggests her unborn’s right to privacy and its own body. Her secret wish is that she could undo her trauma. The voice of her maternal nature is heard again. She speaks of being afraid in the bathroom alluding subconsciously to her deep fear of what her abortions truly mean to her and all the women she enables.

She intentionally removed her unborn from its womb room living room where it thrives not her room at this point, removed her unborn from its private bath, not hers, from its private bed, not hers, taken her unborn out of its bedroom womb room, not hers.

Intentionally violating your unborn’s most basic rights – first to life and to its privacy, not yours, deep down your maternal nature knows you alone must answer to that internal moral compass. And you must answer to the Supreme Judge who gave it to you.

As the Scriptures imply, on that great day of answering to the Supreme Judge – He will simply pull up the shade to your super intelligence and show you your own words, decode them in your presence unless you begin to do so now.

And deep down you know it. You’ve told us in your special imagery tells, “Yes, I am terrified. Very terrified.”

Why you spontaneously reported at your testimony that you thought another contribution to your “ptsd” was “biological anxiety.” A super-intel read on your deep feminine maternal nature which you violated and continue encouraging women to violate.

Why again you thought self-punishment of jumping in front of a train would solve your problems. But it won’t.  As you put it you have a “collegial” personality and must find that with your Creator and his solution to your deep guilt. Jumping in front of a train suggests a crucifixion. Figure it out.

Next scene: Ford returns to the specific moment of her abortions. More imagery confirmation.  More desperation to get her own attention.

Scene 11:

The abortionist and me: hitting walls, playing games
(Story: Ford describes hearing the two drunk persecutors coming downstairs)

Ford’s imagery now takes us back to her womb home with major biological specificity.

She hears the bodies of the two drunk men “hitting the walls” as they go downstairs. Another aggressive act, she suggests hitting the walls of her womb home with the unborn in it. Again, it’s the abortionist downstairs in her body where her unborn lives, hitting the uterine walls, brutally ripping the amniotic sac in an abortion. Both out of control, drunk on their selfish rights.

She testifies that as she sat locked in the bathroom, “I heard Brett and Mark leave the bedroom laughing and loudly walk down the narrow stairs, pin-balling off the walls on the way down.” She depicts the two drunk assailants bouncing off the walls like pinballs. It’s a metaphor for the abortionist knocking her unborn around inside her womb like a pinball in a game machine, the little pinball unborn human being that came rolling out, treating the unborn’s life like nothing more than a game to play – getting rid of it on a whim.

Scene 12:

Running out of the house
Then Ford describes she ran out of the house. Read the tell – she had run her unborn out of its womb home. She can still see the abortionist ripping open the amniotic sac and her unborn pouring out.

And she’s still running from what she’s done – and continues to endorse aggressively. Taking an unborn’s life stays with a woman deep in her core no matter how much she denies it.

No wonder she couldn’t remember how she got home that night. She knew her unborn never got home that night either. It was gone for good. How badly she wants to bury that reality.

Ford’s powerful secret story points to her personal abortion(s) and not just those thousands she has continually enabled.

About the AuthorAndrew Hodges, M.D.

ANDREW G. HODGES, M.D., is a psychiatrist in private practice, a former clinical professor of psychiatry (UAB School of Medicine), and a noted forensic profiler. Experts including FBI agents believe his unique “thoughtprint decoding” method will one day become a fixture in law enforcement much as identifying fingerprints. The author of nine books, he has been interviewed extensively in the media with appearances on Fox News, CNN, ABC, MSNBC and Court TV. His website is AndrewGHodges.com

The post Christine Ford’s Secret Pain: Abortion “PTSD” Explains Kavanaugh Accusation appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

Dr. Christine Blasey Ford now stands before all of America in a moment of crisis, a crisis both personal and public, as she makes her accusations of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

As a psychiatrist and forensic profiler, I specialize in interviewing people at crisis moments especially in the treatment of emotional traumas including sexual abuse.

Psychiatrists have developed a brand new way of scientifically interviewing such people because we have had a tremendous breakthrough revealing a “dazzling unconscious mind” as author Malcolm Gladwell described in his book, Blink. He described how people unconsciously quick-read themselves and key situations in the blink of an eye — super perception. But as psychiatric researchers conducting hands-on therapy we learned that this brilliant super intelligence quickly reveals what it sees by speaking “between the lines” in the language of secret tells — symbolic projections, metaphors and images.

Dr. Christine Blasey Ford now stands before all of America in a moment of crisis, a crisis both personal and public, as she makes her accusations of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

As a psychiatrist and forensic profiler, I specialize in interviewing people at crisis moments especially in the treatment of emotional traumas including sexual abuse.

Psychiatrists have developed a brand new way of scientifically interviewing such people because we have had a tremendous breakthrough revealing a “dazzling unconscious mind” as author Malcolm Gladwell described in his book, Blink. He described how people unconsciously quick-read themselves and key situations in the blink of an eye — super perception. But as psychiatric researchers conducting hands-on therapy we learned that this brilliant super intelligence quickly reveals what it sees by speaking “between the lines” in the language of secret tells — symbolic projections, metaphors and images.

Is she locating, as Jesus put it “a speck in her neighbor Kavanaugh’s eye” when the real motive is the log in her eye? This is precise way Christ characterized the unconscious mind working, as does the new science of unconscious communication. The super intelligence is far more truthful and brilliant than the conscious mind. At key moments the fault in your neighbor’s eye is symbolically your own fault — a symbolic secret tell.

Consider the accusation — Kavanaugh has assaulted her. Decoding the possible secret tell — the projection tell — the truth could be that has Ford violently assaulted others and is now unconsciously projecting that assaultive behavior onto Kavanaugh.

Jesus insisted if you don’t read secret projection tells — symbolic confession language — you miss the message. In other words, decode or remain blind.

Accuser unconsciously interviews herself
Back to Ford’s secret unconscious interview — her unconscious read on herself.
We have major communications filled with hidden messages, potential secret-tell confessions.

We have a letter from Ford, a recent interview by the Washington Post and numerous behavioral tells — often expressed through her attorney who represents a clear proxy for the accuser.

The facts are that Ford has already interviewed herself in some depth. The question is what does she see and what does her symbolic language reveal.

Here is Ford’s secret tell story — and indeed, it’s full of projection confessions

First of all, her July 30 letter to U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a California Democrat, requesting anonymity reflects a strong political motive. She wants to insert herself into a political process. She accuses Kavanaugh of sexual violence towards her decades ago. Consciously, her sole reason is to establish that he should not be confirmed to become a member of the U.S. Supreme Court.

Initially, she wants to remain anonymous and denies any intent to go public. Anonymity suggests symbolically that she doesn’t want to know herself — why she’s unconsciously coming forward. She’s afraid to acknowledge her deeper motives. It’s as though she’s saying, “I don’t want you to know who I am, and I don’t want to know who I am.’

What is she hiding?

After all the raucous and inappropriate Senate Democrat attacks on Kavanaugh, Feinstein comes out with this letter causing a media hullabaloo. It’s clearly a political move designed to disrupt the Kavanaugh confirmation at the last minute, breaking the Senate rules along the way. The chief political issue is abortion. The Democrats fear that Roe vs. Wade will be overturned and abortion rights denied. Without a doubt, this is Feinstein’s deepest motive and Ford’s primary personal motive.

Playing a cat-and-mouse game, Ford and Feinstein succeed in disrupting the scheduled vote. Ford insists she will remain anonymous and not give her name but quickly joins Feinstein in the disrupting process days later. Feinstein’s and Ford’s denial confessions reveal themselves as nothing more than calculated political positioning.

Ford makes a sudden appearance in a Sept. 18 interview with The Washington Post. Telling her story of an alleged assault in more detail, her narrative is packed with secret tells indicating a hidden agenda.

But her appearance is a hit-and-run job. She will consider being interviewed by the Senate, disrupting the vote the next week. Then she changes her mind and through her attorney announces she will refuse an offer to appear before the Senate. She insists that Kavanaugh must first be investigated by FBI. She wants the vote on his confirmation postponed.

Read the secret tell — Ford needs to be investigated for her deeper motives in coming forward. She needs to be investigated by the highest law authority, herself, starting with the Senate. It’s as though she’s saying, “See, my primary motive is political.” She also suggests an absolutely unforgivable violation of the laws of human nature and God’s law.

Ford is a rule breaker par excellence, continually violating the senatorial process boundaries as do the Democrats. She, through her attorney and Feinstein as her proxies, is behaving like a very aggressive disruptive person. She reflects interpersonal attacks on senators — and on American citizens. She had multiple opportunities to come forward but waited for the dramatic effect. As Lindsay Graham called it, “a drive-by shooting” — unconsciously, a far deeper tell than he knew.

But rule-breaking patterns suggest Ford is unconsciously afraid of rules and particularly afraid of being judged. Her secret tells vividly reveals why.

The central issue for the Dems and certainly for Ford: the fear that Kavanaugh will oppose abortion rights for women.

Ford reports being worried for a long time about Kavanaugh becoming a Supreme Court judge. Her behavioral tells now and then suggest she is vastly more concerned about her abortion rights than his alleged abuse of her.

The key is not about who Brett Kavanaugh is, but what he symbolizes to Ford and the Democrats regarding abortion.

What Kavanaugh symbolizes

Now to Ford’s major behavioral tells revealing her deep unconscious fear and guilt over enabling abortions. She attended the Women’s March on Washington the day after Donald Trump’s inauguration driven by one central fear — abortion rights being overturned by the new Republican administration. Obviously preoccupied, she reportedly marched wearing a pink “Pu**y Power” hat.

She removed her social media posts, implying she has much to hide about her deepest motivations.

I have demonstrated in a previous article how the Jan. 21, 2017 Women’s March on Washington was unconsciously motivated by enormous abortion guilt.

Consciously the marchers demanded their rights, but unconsciously they confessed to depriving the unborn of the right to life

As a therapist specializing in unconscious communication, I have treated women pre- and post-abortion. I never tell them what to do nor that they were wrong. I let them tell themselves in their secret tells — projection tells.

When you actually see their unconscious mind reading them in the blink of an eye, that teaches you all your need to know about how a woman really sees abortion, deep in her soul. They always tell themselves, “I am taking a life and terribly guilty.”
A pregnant pre-abortion woman will talk destruction over and over until she recognizes her secret tell on herself. She also sees her womb as a sacred home that’s breaking down. Watch her change her own mind, take a leave from therapy to deliver, and walk back in telling you first thing, “I had that baby.” An unforgettable experience.

Or in post-abortion cases, they eventually allow their severe self-judgment and guilt to lead them to seek healing. This occurs 100 percent of the time for one reason —our unconscious possesses a natural law moral compass. This has been confirmed repeatedly with other therapists who are experts in the field of the new super intelligence.

At the women’s march, the pop star, Madonna, did the same thing. Announcing that she wanted to blow up Trump in the sacred White House, her imagery confessed to her own abortion — taking a life from her own sacred womb. Her abortion is known publicly.

Ford’s violent secret tells
We come to Ford’s secret tell projections in her letter and stories.

She presents numerous violent images which suggest her deeply buried abortion guilt. It’s the key unconscious story about why she’s coming forward. She connects coming forward to her most violent image, “annihilation.”

The Washington Post reported, “By late August, Ford had decided not to come forward, calculating that doing so would upend her life and probably would not affect Kavanaugh’s confirmation. ‘Why suffer through the annihilation if it’s not going to matter?’ she said.”

That projection tell confesses that unborn children have suffered annihilation at her hands, unconsciously upending her life. She must unload her massive guilt on Kavanaugh but knows she’s wrong to affect his confirmation. Deep down this appearance would further reveal a hidden confession publicly — a way of punishing herself.

She’s suffering from annihilation trauma — her attacks on the unborn.

Then she declares in another violent tell from her abuse allegations, “I thought he might inadvertently kill me.”

Her story of an out-of-control Kavanaugh on top of her with his friend in the room laughing as Kavanaugh and his friend roll off on the floor and start scrapping with each other as she escapes doesn’t fit the murderous image. Laughing “manically” instead suggests a teenage prank.

But inadvertently killing someone suggests unconsciously killing a helpless unborn as she and the abortionist — the two of them — carry out their maniacal event oblivious and laughing at the fact that this unborn is actually a human being.

Remember, what she’s saying is her current deeper read on the events of that night now. Importantly she recalled thinking, but again talking, about the present: “I’m not ever telling anyone this. This is nothing, it didn’t happen, and he didn’t rape me.”

She suggests strongly via her hidden confession that nothing really happened. She was fully aware that she was not raped and implies not injured physically running out of the room, later down the stairs and finally running out of the house. (Her letter stating she received “medical treatment for the assault” appears possibly manipulative. She could be referring to her 2012 medical psychiatric or psychological treatment.)

Even more strongly, her own words suggest this event “didn’t happen” — that she has made it mostly up or distorted it or remains confused as to who was who.

At the same time, she’s not telling herself consciously about her rape/assault of the unborn. Not ever telling herself. As for the Kavanaugh event, this is nothing compared to what she’s doing enabling millions of unborn deaths.

She continues, “He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.” But never did. Yet she implies her unconscious deep fear of exposure — self-awareness of what an abortion means to her surfacing.

Furthermore, Kavanaugh as a judge who might help overturn Roe vs. Wade would evoke enormous fear of exposure of her career-long violent victimization of unborns. Now her massive hidden guilt would grow even greater, far greater than any pseudo-assault by a teenager years ago.

The Post further reported, “She was terrified that she would be in trouble if her parents realized she had been at a party where teenagers were drinking, and she worried they might figure it out even if she did not tell them.”

First understand her story begins with enormous secret guilt on her part alone that night. Reading more deeply, she implies her own unconscious parental guilt over abortion — terrified that it would break into her consciousness. She has figured it all out unconsciously and is the parents on the senatorial committee and throughout the nation as to what she’s really done.

In agreeing finally to be interviewed by Congress, Ford makes the special request for assurance that she would be safe at the hearing. She’s thinking of death threats —also unconsciously of the deaths of countless unborn babies which will forever haunt her unconscious mind. Along the way, she’s simultaneously confessing that she should also make Kavanaugh safe from her attacks.

Another major tell in her story is that she depicts a violent event occurring in a house she can’t remember although she was personally there. She suggests very possibly she aborted a fetus in her own womb home or that she encouraged a close friend’s abortion. Much less the numerous other abortions she has encouraged in her marches and in her career as a therapist.

Additionally, she refers to a later period of “unhealthy relationships.” Could this include unhealthy relationships with unborns—abortions, hers or a friend’s? Unhealthy relationships suggest other powerful unresolved traumas.

Importantly, Ford never realized the alleged Kavanaugh trauma had a lasting impact on her until 2012 in psychotherapy. But easily a pro-choice therapist could miss a far greater post-traumatic stress disorder regarding abortion guilt—unconsciously displaced onto the alleged Kav incident. We know one event often covers a far deeper more powerful second trauma.

Anonymous and locked up from hidden motive
Numerous secret tells match perfectly her secret wish to keep herself from seeing her enormous guilt, remaining anonymous and unknown to herself. She’s locked up from seeing her deep-consuming guilt. Her account of the alleged incident is full of secret tell images of hiding: locked door, locking herself in a bathroom, hand over her mouth, can’t be heard yelling, didn’t talk to anyone and never told parents.

All in all, Ford’s yelling unconsciously at herself and the senatorial committee — and America — that she’s driven far and away to come forward by her guilt, not primarily Kavanaugh’s. Explaining her powerful political motive as central.

The great media myth accompanied by Dems
The mainstream media strongly supports abortion on demand — in massive denial joining people such as Dr. Ford in her denial. We see the great media myth, their secret denial tell that Ford has nothing to gain by coming forward. No hidden motives at all. The great political motive fix.

Unconsciously she has told us of her radical pro-choice attacks on the unborn. She has confessed to her enormous unconscious motivation not only to dump on Kavanaugh but stop him in the process. She completely avoids the severe guilt that’s eating her up. Now suffering from massive annihilation guilt, she can support Roe vs. Wade to keep it intact while keeping her guilt from surfacing.

In a new condition for a senate interview, Ford insists on Kavanaugh testifying first with no chance to respond to his accuser. She suggests a wish to abort his career without him speaking back—an unconscious proxy for the aborted unborn she never allows to speak.

Senators and lawyers are not trained to listen to secret tell unconscious messages and unaware of the new science. Eventually, they can learn to listen in this new day and age of the super intelligence. But for now, they should see through Ford’s cover-up trauma story and recognize her true political motive.

This political issue of pro-life vs pro-abortion is the crucial issue facing America today and the preservation of our natural law constitutional republic. The radical reactions of the media and the Dems along with Dr. Ford testify to this.

Christine Blasey Ford stands in as a proxy for liberals and the mainstream media, all run by the unconscious guilt mafia. You can run from America’s founders who insisted on the right to life per the laws of human nature. You can run from Jesus, too, along with Nature’s God, but you can’t hide forever.

This article was originally published on Freedom Outpost.

The post Christine Ford’s Secret Tells Point To Powerful, Deeper Motive appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

The key to this case can be found in Paddock’s’s unconscious mind where his motives are buried. Unable to face the deeper pain that drove his rage, Paddock himself could not tell us his real motives. Only his unconscious can do that. Few know how specifically the vast unconscious speaks, but it does.

Dr. Reid Meloy, a California-based forensic psychologist noted that mass murders normally have a grievance but he can’t figure it out or articulate it. Yet the key is knowing how to decode the unconscious. That’s what I do for a living.

From the broken window on the 32^nd floor of the Mandalay Bay hotel, Stephen Paddock was secretly telling the world just how great was his grievance.

Humans all possess a newly discovered deeper unconscious mind: a super intelligence that can speak. My job is to listen, to decipher its symbolic meaning, and use it to understand. In his best-selling book, Blink, Malcolm Gladwell described “a dazzling new unconscious” that quick-reads reality in the blink of an eye but speaks only through instincts.

But long before Blink’s publication in 2005, a genius psychiatrist discovered in therapy how clearly this “see all” super intelligence speaks verbally. It secretly patterns symbolic messages in code between the lines of conscious communication. It speaks in images, stories and projections—far brighter and faster than our conscious mind. I validated this discovery in clinical research and in my book, The Deeper Intelligence.

I also decode unconscious messages from criminals who invariably confess their guilt between the lines. This led to my new forensic profiling method, “thoughtprint decoding.”

As a therapist I decode messages from severe emotional trauma victims, people like Stephen Paddock. Such people consciously bury the real meaning of their trauma. Nevertheless, the trauma remains constantly frozen in the back of their minds. It’s as if the threat of the trauma’s reoccurrence remains there, deep in their unconscious. It’s an unconscious post-traumatic stress disorder.

Stephen Paddock tells his story in secret projections which explains his rage.

Paddocks’ imagery in his last communications to his live-in girlfriend, Marilou Danley, contained significant subliminal communication about his motives. These are crucial overlooked communications to the closest person on earth to him at the time.

After her FBI interview Danley said that Paddock told her: “I want you to take a trip home to see your family. I found a cheap ticket to the Philippines.”

Symbolically, “take a trip home to see your family” strongly implies a projection that he is unconsciously thinking about his own traumatic past home life. Just prior to mass murder, he is taking a trip down bad memory lane. Immediately this points to his horrific trauma from the sudden, totally out of the blue, family-destroying trip his bank robbing, criminal father took him on at a very early age. A trip that never ended, that he deeply buried.

Secretly he implies the shocking realization, “I was just a cheap ticket to my father, of no value, degraded by him. He was more concerned about money and robbing banks than me, and robbing me of a father.”

He also sent his girlfriend money on her trip “to buy your family a house.” Read his projection: “I deeply wished my father had bought us a permanent house, provided a stable family.”  Instead, he was deeply cheated, robbed of a home. Paddock had often nurtured kids and neighbors as he wished he had been nurtured.

Paddocks’ father-son relationship—the mental trip home where it started

A brief picture of his father-son relationship shows just how severe his wounds were— the deepest grievance imaginable he had kept secret since age 7.

Just out after six years in prison, his jailbird father married in 1952, had son Stephen in 1953 and was immediately sent back to prison on a three-year stretch. It was a total abandonment of his son. Out of jail in 1956, father and mother then moved away, changed names and began a new life. Masquerading for four years as an ideal father and husband having three more sons, his father had a generous larger-than-life side. It would have been a huge salve for Stephen’s earlier father abandonment—now he had the perfect father.

Secretly his father then committed a series of armed bank robberies. Suddenly arrested in Las Vegas during which he attempted to murder an FBI agent, his father never returned home and would never be seen again by Stephen. Overnight his idealized father was gone and serving a 20-year sentence.

Stephen age 7 experiences shocking massive father deception, total abandonment again, a violent dangerous father who carried a gun and nearly murdered. And, of course, inordinate personal shame.

Unconsciously he experiences his father as totally destroying his life—a murderous attack.

Neighbors were shocked and tried to keep the truth from Stephen, but he knew. His mother immediately moved to California and told the boys their father had died. No grieving, no father, tons of fear and shame, and instructed to keep it all secret, but Stephen knows inside. Old enough to remember the police coming to his house that fateful day. He buries his trauma deeper and deeper.

But he would always associate the moment of utter deception and final abandonment by his father with Las Vegas, Nevada.

Eventually his father escapes from prison becoming one of the ten most wanted dangerous men in America for nearly a decade. But Stephen already knew just how dangerous he could be.

Back To His Girlfriend
In the end he treated his girlfriend as his criminal father treated him. Subtly ordering his girlfriend to go away implies again how his father abandoned him, sent him away.

Then, violently abandoning her by suicide he again repeats his father’s behavior as he experienced it–a violent symbolic suicide.

His girlfriend provided another hint. Since he gave her money to buy a house for her family back home, she thought Paddock was planning to break up with her—but denied “he was planning violence against anyone.”

She consciously overlooked the violence he was preparing to inflict on her personally—stark utter abandonment through suicide. But subliminally she recognized Paddock’s unconscious violent message: he was getting ready to symbolically break up with— break—destroy—the one person who had severely abandoned and wounded him so long ago. He was looking to retaliate symbolically against his bank robbing father who had abandoned his family overnight. Her super-intel had picked up the secret.

Dragging her into the horror of his murderous behavior reveals he experienced his father’s behavior as repeat murderous attacks.

Sudden abandonment, loss of home, poverty, shame, and in the back of his mind continually a Top Ten Most Wanted dangerous father are experienced as symbolic murders deep down. Read “my father killed me in so many different ways—and my brothers and mother. Robbed us repeatedly daily.”
Just as Paddock reenacted his father’s symbolic suicide on his girlfriend, he reenacted his father’s secret murderous rage toward him on his mass murder victims that night.

When Paddock kept killing and wounding hundreds of innocent concertgoers—unconsciously he was looking at his abusive father. He shot him over and over, shouting out his unbearable unconscious secret: his father had destroyed him as if he had shot him a thousand times with his repeated abandonments and abuse. He was inflicting his deep haunting sense of being a cheap ticket on all his cheap ticket victims at the concert.

Carrying out his mass murder in Las Vegas suggests an unconscious flashback to his father’s shocking arrest in that city, the massive deception, and final abandonment. Stephen never saw him again.  His father destroyed him in Vegas and he would repay him in Vegas in a mass murder rage. Revisiting the precise moment of his father’s maximum betrayal.

Signs of Slippage

There were signs of Paddock’s regression. When he fell on something slippery in a casino in 2012 and sued, he suggests his slippery family framework that did violence to him—couldn’t hold him up any longer. He complained about a damaged hamstring suggesting how his father trauma had hamstrung him his entire life. Feeling deeply wounded and entitled he suggests he was beginning to slip mentally already. During his deposition he alluded to losing his wits. He said rarely drank alcohol when he gambled, because “at the stakes I play, you want to have all your wits about you, or as much wit as I have.”

Around 2015  he began to publicly berate his girlfriend as his father had degraded him.

In 2016 immediate family events triggered his further regression dealing with his father’s abuse: his aging mother turned 90 creating another impending “abandonment” and reminding him of his father’s great abandonment/ abuse. He also carried a deep grievance toward her for having to bury his pain and anger. And for enabling such a father.

Stephen Paddock, a man known for never getting angry, had cracked and retaliated in kind in a moment of calculated unmitigated rage. Just as his father was constantly calculating another crime, another robbery—toying with his family over and over.

Final explosion: ‘Feel my pain’
Paddock’s final explosion is a symbolic behavioral confession and story of motives—of his deep grievances. It’s a story of severe father-son abuse at a level we cannot comprehend. Paddock made others feel his severe pain to avoid his own unconscious pain. He massacred strangers as he felt massacred by his father—it was that severe deep down.

He also identified with his father described as “a larger-than-life outlaw.” Paddock both surpassed his father in his rage—“a larger than life mass murderer outlaw”—to shame his father in return and to punish himself for doing so simultaneously.

This is Stephen Paddock’s story: Father destroyed/murdered him deep down. He wanted to murder father as payback. He then re-enacted it on others and finally suicided because of guilt. The great abuse three-step. It’s so powerful, only the unconscious super intelligence can tell us the truth about it in its metaphoric messages.

He’s still responsible but understanding tells us why he exploded.

The post Steven Paddock’s Motives: Father-son relationship gone horribly bad appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

Hidden in her profanity-laced attack on President Donald Trump and his supporters was the iconic entertainer’s admission from her heart of hearts—her “super mind”—that she understands that all life is sacred and that a woman’s right to choose an abortion is really a right to murder.

Put simply, the super mind is a deeper intelligence than our conscious mind. It perceives reality in far more detail than the conscious mind and is an expert at observing and analyzing deeper motives while insisting on the truth. As validated in original clinical research, we’ve found that the unconscious mind is a secret genius light years ahead of the conscious mind. Our super mind— the “other 90 percent of the human mind”—sees further, tells more and remains unfailingly honest.

Consciously thinking Madonna was spitting in Trump’s face and at his pro-life supporters, but her unconscious, see-all super mind was actually spitting into the teeth of the pro-choice/pro-abortion group which drove the protest. Thinking she was passionately speaking for pro-choice, secretly she was far more passionately confessing that she understands the violent nature of abortion. Deep down, Madonna was speaking in defense of the unborn child.

Determining reality of projection

How do we know Madonna was projecting onto Trump? As we discovered in case after case in psychotherapy where the super mind was recently discovered, the super mind operates on an absolute moral compass, the same moral compass embraced by our founders—laws of human nature coming from  God.

Madonna thinks that, since abortions are now legal, the moral law is on her side. But her super mind—speaking in projection code—sees far more deeply. She instructs us on the crucial matter revealing the current legal law violates her own internal moral law.

As Kellyanne Conway said at the pro-life march a week later on January 27, protecting “life” is fundamental to the Constitution. Abortions contradict the internal rule of law, she said. But Madonna consciously disagrees.

Yet, the Material Girl will take us past her denial showing us that very law at work within her deep unconscious super mind. She has two moral compasses—her super mind sees much further. 

As a central spokeswoman, Madonna provided the deepest look ever into the soul of the worldwide women’s movement.The conscious mind sees shallow, the super mind sees deep. Madonna’s super mind not only profiled herself, it also used its symbolic language to reveal precisely what the women’s movement is all about at its core.

Madonna makes a radical confession, a culture-changing confession, asking herself and her sisters-in-protest to accept the unacceptable about themselves. In effect, she’s having a huge argument with herself and with our founders, and she’s telling herself a truth she cannot stand up to consciously but desperately needs to face.

‘Blow up White House’ rage— matches abortion rage

So when she says “I’m angry… I’m outraged… yes, I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House,” her super mind is saying what? Is this a projection? We must decode the symbolic messages.

Tellingly, on the day following her public tirade, Madonna unconsciously underscored the super mind’s way of using language. She’d been speaking only “in metaphor,” she said. Secretly she was instructing listeners to decode her metaphors—her symbolic messages (often projections)—instructing us how to decode her angry comments from the day before. Secretly disclosing how her super mind sees abortion. 

First the White House symbolizes the most special abode in America—painted white, symbolizing purity. A house itself symbolizes a home, a secure container which keeps all intruders out. A house becomes a home which nurtures those living there. In the White House live the symbolic father and mother of America.

Now Madonna wants to blow up the White House. She’s not angry at the house itself, of course, but what it symbolizes and now the person, the president who lives there.

Madonna wants to blow Trump and his supporters into total oblivion. In a profanity-laced oration she repeats, “F**k Trump, F**k Trump!” In her imperfect primitive mind, she’s a murdering terrorist and wishes she could get away with it. She’s living the conscious Hollywood dream of the protestor free to speak her own mind, however, extreme, however crude. “I’m free baby, free!” Except she has a huge problem—her super mind. And so does Hollywood and the women’s movement. She has no idea that the truly great unconscious mind exists, yet it speaks so powerfully. It’s describing herself while severely judging her.

Return to her image—what crucial White House is she talking about? What home of hers is she blowing to smithereens?  What home of women? She’s really talking about the pure house of her sacred womb and its inhabitant—the unborn human being.
Unconsciously she sees straight through the sham that abortion is just a choice, a woman’s right. In “plain” imagery her projection language declares it’s murder and mayhem—blowing little human beings out of existence.

Unknowingly she pleads: “Hear me plain, a human being lives in my sacred womb, my pure nurturing home that contains the most important human being in my world—my baby.”

Isn’t that how every mother feels about her child? Isn’t that even how Madonna feels about her own children, the ones for whom she waged vicious custody battles after her bitter divorce?

Madonna’s super mind testifies that abortion is taking a life and violates everyone’s universal values. She is the poster woman for the super mind’s law of nature “protect life” moral compass indwelling all women.

Unconsciously she declares the pro-life movement is right to protect innocent lives. Decoded, Madonna’s hostile speech stunningly reveals how pro-life her super mind truly is.

She’s vividly exposing the killing fields of the women’s movement. 

Madonna corrects herself—start new revolution of love
The super mind always offers a clear model of correction. The next day, thinking she could take back her violent nature—her desire to blow up the White House—she underscores it with two classic “protests too much” denials, “I’m not violent, I’m not violent.” Again the super mind instructs. Read through her denial imagery to see her confirming confession of how doubly violent she truly is.

But listen to her super mind correction as she insisted when her speech began, “I want to start a revolution of love.” And the next day she declared it had been an honor (the H word) to have been part of an audience chanting “we choose love.” She’s a millimeter away from shouting “choose life.”

Her shadow side—and identifying projections

Madonna referenced her two sides—expressing anger and outrage and then hope and love. Hear her super mind confirmation, “I shared two ways of looking at things.” She’s asking us to see her mind two ways. She speaks two languages—conscious literal language and the super mind language of metaphor.

Consciously she rationalizes her projected anger onto Trump. She has no intention of stopping her assault on the unborn, and—in her desperate attempt to justify herself—she’s still encouraging millions of women to get abortions. Misery loves company, guilt loves fellow destroyers.

But her super mind tells us to hear the symbolic language of her super mind confessing her brutal violence. How do we know she’s projecting her violence and denying it?

First you identify projections with reality—here life and death. A death you can’t undo. Yet she insists her “my right to my body” conscious moral compass says it’s okay—and denies a life exists inside her womb.

Consciously she destroys the unborn, unconsciously her super mind wants the unborn to live. Yet she chooses based on her conscious mind with all its blind spots—certain it sees all, certain no deeper law lives inside her, she’s immune to new revelation from her own super mind.

Madonna confesses she violates her deeper, loving self, and denies that she chooses to destroy. And she can’t take back her destruction. She’s in a terrible bind—blind to her true self and destroying lives. But she offers herself a solution.

Marchers’ projections of abuse—point to abortion guilt

Millions were puzzled as to the protest purpose. In essence, the march centered around abortion. They feared the “pro-life” Trump was going to take away “my rights to my body, my right to choose.” They declared he was abusive and degraded women, seeing them as sex objects. They also demanded equal pay for women. But, thinking it was about women’s rights, they secretly confessed to their deep fear of how badly they were violating their own inner laws.

Decode all the protestors’ various complaints and we see that their images were also metaphors for abortion—confirming Madonna’s secret confession. They too answer to a deeper moral compass. Unknowingly they spoke for the rights of the unborn. Just listen.

The unborn choose life—as every one of them does in the womb– their right to their body. There are no suicides in the womb—they all fight hard to live as neo-natal nurses will tell you.

The unborn should not be abused and degraded. The unborn should not be diminished as unwanted products of irresponsible sex. No, the unborn deserve “equal pay,” equal worth as a person.

Madonna, who has two kids, knows this intuitively. We could call this the “Great Unconscious March for the Unborn,” as guilty mothers confess.

Secretly their unconscious guilt is off the charts. They are furious with themselves. Unconsciously they judge themselves abusive, power hungry, neglectful victimizers who take lives. Judgment oozes from their pores. 

Madonna sees Judgment Day and verdict

Remember, too, at age 58, Madonna’s own physical death is not so distant. Meanwhile, her super mind points toward an ultimate judgment day. Unconsciously she looks to the end of her life, and the end of the women’s movement. Repeatedly dropping F-bombs on opponents of the women’s march, she said, “To our detractors that insist that this march will never add up to anything: F**k you!”

Don’t miss she’s talking future judgment—what her life and the protesters will amount to. Her projection asserts “nothing– but destruction.”

Remember, Madonna took her stage name from her Roman-Catholic background, naming herself after Mary, the original Madonna. Now she’s on the run from the destruction and violence she inflicts secretly on others. On the run from her hidden guilt, she knows her deepest need: grace, the only solution—Jesus taking her sins away.

Her super mind sees her only hope–an ultimate atonement forgiveness, for a scapegoat savior to undo her severe guilt. In her enabling mind for blowing millions of babies up in one abortion bomb after another.

But first she must “choose love” and stop the violence. Read no more legal abortions. Then ask for forgiveness. 

Hidden confession in song ‘Human Nature’

Think about her confession of abortion in her original song “Human Nature”—she’s got it on full display. See how the imagery in her lyrics clearly depicts an abortion as her super mind speaks for the unborn and their human nature all the way back in 1994. And she insisted on singing it at the women’s protest march.

Twice she says “I’m not sorry,” suggesting a denial apology to the unborn.

She’s supposedly looking at a relationship where she couldn’t speak her mind. She couldn’t say the words she desired, was silenced “with bitterness and lies.” The other party didn’t “see life through my eyes”—a poignant read on abortion. She wonders “did I do something wrong, didn’t know I couldn’t speak”—as the unborn would cry out if only he could speak. Then the image of being shoved “in my narrow room away from you” suggesting the grave, as his mother abandons him forever.

Finally Madonna confesses, “I’m breakin’ all the rules I didn’t make” suggesting a confession to her Creator who made the rules of life, the rules she’s breaking.

Self-degradation: “Nothing but p***y”

A consistent feature of the march was the extremes of self-degradation.  Taking some degrading comments Trump made about women referencing “p***y” in 2008, the women protestors magnified it to a power of 200,000, thinking that if they all degraded themselves they were all good. But self-degradation is what it is—self-judgment. Consciously mocking Trump, they mocked themselves.

Wearing their pink “p***y” hats and with oh-so-cool cynical tongues in cheek, they celebrated in a childish show-and-tell the extreme promiscuous sex they so heartily endorse—nowhere more so than from the pulpits of Hollywood and college campuses. That promiscuity that leads to abortion as easy birth control. Easy as pick-up night. 

Madonna and the great disconnect: The vagina and the sacred womb
From Madonna and her friends we witness the great disconnect—the rise and fall of Femininity.
These protesting women have declared their true identity. They have carried out the great disconnect between their vaginas and their wombs.

It’s as though they’re saying, “We’re just vaginas waiting to gratify and self-gratify, just sex objects, not a unique person. We destroy motherhood. We destroy childhood for millions. Carelessly we think we can so easily get another motherhood moment or another child on our timing when we’re ready. After all, we’re in charge.”

This is why the infamous Vagina Monologues are so misleading. The dramatization suggests women have finally come of age in all their vaginal glory. But now that glory comes cheap. Women think life is now a monologue—and indeed it becomes one.

They forget real life is a dialogue. The real vagina dialogue is with a real lover, a soulmate husband who enables the two of them to create a new life, a child with whom they each can dialogue their whole life—and with their children’s children. Life is a dialogue created in a living dialogue with a Creator. That dialogue needs repairing. And their super minds tell us what we need is a new dialogue of forgiveness, serious atonement forgiveness.

This article ran on Freedomoutpost.com on 2/15/17.

The post Madonna’s Secret Protest: the great disconnect—the vagina and the sacred womb appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

Arpaio noted that the fraud was a major violation of federal law—regardless of where Obama was born—and sent his findings to Congress. Predictably his conclusions were ignored by the mainstream media.

But Obama has been confessing unconsciously to his illegal presidency for some time in exactly the way Jesus and cutting-edge psychoanalysis reveals—in one “log in his eye” projection after another. Remember the new understanding of the human mind. A person’s subconscious, far more astute than we ever realized, quick-reads himself in the blink of an eye. So we listen to Obama’s projections which are both his quick-read take on himself and a model of correction.

This monumental paradigm shift in psychology allows us to understand unconscious communication and the human mind’s startling super-intel awareness of conflicts and resolution. This new knowledge about the human mind allows us to fully grasp a man’s meaning.

Understand the new science of unconscious communication provides the exclusive hard evidence—apart from circumstantial evidence (fraudulent birth certificate, refusal to release any records, etc.)—that Obama is an illegal president. His unconscious super-intel mind has specifically confessed in its unique language.

Projection confessions

Looking back at Obama’s recent comments, we find distinct projection confessions. While in Germany on November 17 he spoke about false news (a projection in itself) and how to determine the truth.

Obama declared, “In an age of so much misinformation—packaged very well…if we’re not serious about facts, about what’s true and what’s not, if we can’t discriminate between serious arguments and propaganda then we have problems.”

In other words, he has disseminated misinformation about the legality of his smoothly packaged presidency, lied about the facts and propagandized America from the beginning of his candidacy.

Obama’s super-intel reports exactly where his deceit led. If we don’t discriminate between the truth and a lie and spot the propaganda, “we won’t know what to protect. We won’t know what to fight for.”

When the media, the Congress and the courts—all the way to the Supreme Court— submitted to Obama’s propaganda, together they carried out the biggest birth conspiracy of all: accepting his U.S. birth and Hawaiian birth certificate as true facts.

Indeed, they didn’t know what to protect or what to fight for—our very foundation, the rule of law. That’s how close we are to losing America. No wonder Congress can’t face Arpaio’s findings.

Obama’s super-intel warns us, “We can lose so much of what we’ve gained in terms of democratic freedoms…prosperity we come to take for granted.” He’s hinting that we can lose our democracy. We can take our prosperity for granted as great nations invariably do before they fall from within.

We return to Obama’s admonition to get the facts—precisely what Sheriff Arpaio has just provided. Facts are determined by reality, and our leaders have consistently ignored the reality of Obama’s phony birth certificate.

Here is where the breakthrough to the magnificent super-intel comes into play. Projections identify accurate unconscious facts someone wants to hide. The bottom line is that our brilliant super-intel picks up on the facts. It’s vastly superior to our conscious minds which remain prone to blind spots.

Imagery of illegality
Unconsciously Obama’s consistent projection imagery presents the deeper fact of his illegal presidency almost daily. In Obama’s extensive interview with Rolling Stone magazine one day after the election, he said the way to bring the country together in the face of false news “is how we create a common set of facts.” Note the repetitive projection that he has created “fake news” about his presidency, but he points again to the answer—get the facts.

In the interview, he specifically points to his illegal presidency, and he spontaneously links Trump’s surprising election to his own election.

Early on election night in 2008 his key advisors told him, “We don’t think we’re gonna win this thing.” Read his super-intel imagery; he didn’t think he should have won the election and didn’t really win because he had been ineligible to run.

Confirming his hidden confession, Obama then told how he would advise Trump, “Number 1, however you campaigned, once you’re in this office, you are part of a legacy dating back to those first Revolutionaries. And this amazing experiment in democracy has to be tended.”

It’s another projection confession. Obama campaigned as the first revolutionary illegitimate president and took office as such. He failed to tend to—protect—America’s amazing democracy. Instead he experimented with it, breaking the rule of law, our nation’s very foundation—and got away with it.

Don’t overlook his continued unconscious instructions to Trump: tend to democracy by enforcing the rule of law. Unknowingly Obama continues to instruct Trump to investigate his illegal presidency. As demonstrated in my recent book, The Stockholm Syndrome President: How Trump Triggered Obama’s Hidden Confession, Obama intuitively pleaded with Trump to hold him accountable and free him from his secret control by radical Islam. This led to Obama’s illegal candidacy and attack on America. Now Trump has new factual evidence: Arpaio’s proof of a forged Obama birth certificate.

Immigrant president

In the Rolling Stone interview, Obama makes a familiar reference to immigrants secretly referring to himself. The 2016 election results showed that “Democratic immigration-rights activists failed to realize borders mean something to the majority of Americans,” he said. His super-intel is saying he was an immigration-rights activist about his illegal presidency entitled to make up his own rules and assault millions of Americans who knew that without borders we have no country. His super-intel functions as a “rule of law” activist correcting him and confessing to his great misdeed.

His denial confession reveals his contradictory thinking. He insists that “the rule of law and values that stay true to our (his) immigrant roots…don’t have to be contradictory.” Notice Obama’s illogical thinking—he can both break the law and keep it at the same time as his key imagery declares, “I am an immigrant rooted in an illegal presidency.”

This matches his earlier comment that fake news created a “dust cloud of nonsense”—a perfect description of his fake presidency.

Ban illegal presidency
In rich projection imagery he then tells of people on Facebook “passing crazy stuff about [how he] has banned the Pledge of Allegiance.” Again secretly he admits that he behaved in a crazy way running as an illegal president and totally destroyed his allegiance to America. He reveals how distorted—“crazy”—his conscious thinking is so that it allows him to severely violate the law and it means nothing. His reference to the “Pledge” points to the oath of office he specifically violated on his Inauguration Day in 2009. He knows his presidency should be banned. He should still be impeached.

In the end Obama’s super-intel provides the antidote to his misleading of America with his illegitimate election. The answer—come back to the facts.

The interview took place in the Oval Office. Obama commented, “Sitting behind that desk is sobering…it will have an impact on him [Trump] as it has on every president.” Obama soberly and solemnly acknowledges his true legacy as America’s only illegal president. He cannot live with himself without telling the truth subliminally.

Informed citizens only hope to constrain Obama

His super-intel reveals the stunning solution now, “I think the most important constraint on any president is the American people themselves, of an informed citizenry that is active and participating and engaged.” It’s as though he’s advising, “American citizens—of which I am not one—get the facts about my horrendous illegal presidency. Hear my super-intel telling you that secret fact again and then constrain me. Match it with the circumstantial facts of my suppression of my records. Match it with my forged birth certificate—now an undeniable fact.

Even our conservative leaders can suffer Beltway blindness. One leader—an outsider—saw it. Donald Trump was certain Obama was an illegal citizen. Can he now return to that belief for America’s sake? Obama himself tells us how important it is that he be brought to justice—America’s rule of law restored to its rightful place. Obama’s super-intel speaks not only for himself but for all America—to fight for and protect our nation.
Arpaio has done his part, now it’s up to the citizens.

Obama’s encouraging Americans to become informed and then take action. Constrain him by urging—insisting—their congressional representatives restore the rule of law. Deep down Obama knows he should be impeached—it’s the only way for justice to be satisfied.

Because of that unconscious fact he promises “that is going to be something that I will, in my own modest ways, continue to try to encourage for the rest of my life.” Obama will continue to confess subliminally. His inner God-given moral compass demands it.

This article ran on Freedomoutpost.com on 12/30/16

The post Obama Validates Arpaio Report: Confesses to Illegal Presidency appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

How do you think Barack Obama answered?

Millions of Americans had voted with their heart and soul praying to be delivered from Obama’s disastrous administration. As much as they disliked Hillary Clinton, this pro-Trump turnout was motivated more by Obama than by Hillary. The word on the street and in the conservative press was “Please, dear God, no Obama third term.”

Of course, since his narcissistic personality had suffered an unmistakably negative referendum, Obama would certainly engage in denial.

For Obama it was a time for a deeper super intelligence, soul-searching moment of true confession of his deepest, darkest secret—if you know how to decode projections, you will hear it. Simply take the topic he’s talking about and apply it to him.

To truly understand the often-irrational mind of Barack Obama—to put it clinically– we must grasp that Obama possesses an unconscious super intelligence that quick-reads him instantaneously and projects in specific imagery his huge flaws—proverbial logs in his eye—onto others.

But the projection also represents great wisdom and a model of correction if applied to himself (his super-intel’s goal). This monumental paradigm shift in psychology allows us to understand unconscious communication and the human mind’s startling super-intel awareness of conflicts and ideal resolution.

This new knowledge about the human mind allows us to fully grasp a man’s meaning.

And voters also possess an unconscious super-intel that secretly reads Obama’s projections and his contradictory behavior. This is the reason why people often say trust the voters—because voters pick up on the deeper truth, with exceptions such as the 2008 and 2012 elections.

Those exceptions were the result of the mistaken notion that America had to anoint its ‘first black president” to prove its national self-righteousness.

Back to the great question for Obama—“was the loss to Trump a referendum on you, sir?” Without the slightest hesitation in his Washington Post interview Obama descended into massive denial and then delivered a treatise on unconscious awareness and projection of exactly who he is. Listen up.

Illegal presidency imagery
In projection code—talking of Republicans but really of himself—he reveals in key imagery he’s an illegal president. He continues to admit how devastating that has been for the United States. Unconsciously he offers this as a central explanation why the Democrats lost the election. Secretly he sees that the people knew.

He strings together repeated imagery symbolic of his illegal presidency, together forming the thoughtprint pattern that confirms his unconscious symbology—the encoded central message.

First he warns that Republicans must “guard against a crude nationalism” taking root in the U.S. Think of it this way: as an illegal president Obama crudely claimed American citizenship outside the rule of law. Indeed, over the course of his administration he has continually violated one law after another.

He warns Republicans to guard against an exclusive “ethnic identity,” pointing to his exclusive role as “first black president” which allowed him to escape any vetting of his illegal presidency. Anyone who questioned his citizenship was immediately labeled racist. The media followed in lockstep labeling those who wanted him vetted as wacky birther conspiricists.

Obama further warned Republicans of “tribalism built around us and them,” again alluding to his tribal Kenyan birth. He divided the country into “us and them,” his supporters versus those who questioned his legality.

No discussion of an illegal presidency was allowed. It was “don’t question me” or “you’re involved in the birther conspiracy.” Could he really get away with hiding his complete records all the way to the White House? Indeed he did, before finally producing a phony birth certificate in 2011 as determined by Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse in Arizona’s Maricopa County. Of course the media ignored the finding.

Arpaio’s team has a new report due to be released on December 15 which should further substantiate Obama’s federal law violation with crucial new information. Of course the media will ignore the findings—ever the Obama legacy makers.

‘Mismatch’ indeed

Obama continues projecting. He said there was a “mismatch” between his 56 percent approval rating before the election and the Democrats losing the White House. He insisted, “people think I did a pretty good job.” Except he forgot about the far larger unconscious mind of voters and his own. First he confesses that, as an illegal president, he was a “mismatch” for the presidency.

He fails to understand that approval polls are conscious votes, but in a highly charged politically correct racial environment many will speak politely of him but vote differently. The groundswell for Trump reflected just how passionately people opposed Obama. Millions of Americans are understandably incensed at his treatment of them and their beloved country.

Deep down Obama’s super-intel sees that the people picked up on his great secret, his unconstitutional presidency. He explains how this was a major underlying factor in Trump’s election.

Obama recognized a common theme in populist movements her and in Europe—specifically referring to his illegal presidency. He declared that people had been disrupted “in very concrete ways” by “globalization.” In other words, his illegal global presidency resulted after he came to us secretly as a citizen from another part of the globe. No wonder he often showed more interest in other countries than America. That was a very concrete way of being a “global” president.

Obama’s super-intel imagery clarifies how citizens saw through his illegitimate presidency—either consciously or unconsciously. He sets up his punch line—the clearest image of his illegal presidency—when he commented, “psychologically people are less certain of their [his] national identities or their [his] place in the world. It starts looking different and disorienting.”

In other words, people caught on psychologically to his foreign national identity and his lack of place in America. Increasingly his decisions looked different—un-American. His illegal presidency was disorienting to citizens who had never seen anything like it.

Many Americans consciously realized he was an illegal president, but many others picked up on it in their intuitive far-seeing subconscious.

In another interview on December 8 with CNN’s Fareed Zakaria, Obama again confessed unconsciously that his presidency was illegal. He overtly mentioned the subject in a classic “thou protests too much” denial confession. He blamed opposition to his presidency on racism by prejudiced birthers—again linking it to Trump’s election. It’s as though he’s saying, “I must incessantly mention that I’m not an illegal president to secretly confess I am one. I cannot let the subject go—continually projecting my blame onto birthers. Secretly I know voters spotted this admission.”

The gospel of distorted thinking
Why is it crucial to grasp Obama’s subconscious confessions of his illegal presidency now? His guilt is fueling his distorted thinking as he tries to achieve his legacy goal of reshaping the opinion of millions of citizens.

Secretly he has every intention of carrying out an intellectual bloodbath, disorienting the people’s thinking—persuading from within, Alinsky-style—to embrace virtual lawlessness by calling it normal.

Convinced they are entitled to make up their own laws, millions have already  swallowed the mind-altering Kool-Aid. Everything goes, whatever I say is right, and if people learn to group-think like this—we will conquer the world as we destroy it and ourselves.

In another projection Obama confesses precisely how he gains a following by enabling others to violate the rule of law and in turn support his illegal presidency and irrational thinking. He notes how Republicans “dangerously discriminate” against minority groups and “prevent blacks, Latinos, or gays or women from participating in rebuilding America.”

But secretly he’s talking about himself, how he creates various groups of minority victims to discriminate against law-abiding citizens to divide the country.

In The Washington Post interview he continued to attack our culture, insisting conservatives lack character and values. He implemented his new moral compass with familiar propaganda buzz words such as fair, inclusive, non-discriminatory and uniting. But secretly he’s divisive, subverting the truth, subverting natural law.

The truth is whatever Obama wants to make it—because deep down like all rule violators he fears accountability to The One to whom our deeper moral compass points. But his all-seeing super-intel possesses a God-given natural law moral compass that compels him to tell the truth. Making up his own rules unknowingly violates his very essence.

Obama is not done doing his damage.

Obama’s the great divider because he himself has been deeply divided since birth. During his horrific childhood he was programmed to assault America as an unconscious Stockholm Syndrome victim to radical Islam. (See my book, The Stockholm Syndrome President: How Trump Triggered Obama’s Hidden Confession.) He truly remains a secret prisoner to destruction. Deep down he subconsciously confesses because he wants to be freed. Yet his shadow side continues to self-destruct.

This article ran on Freedomoutpost.com on 12/14/16

The post Obama Confesses Illegal Presidency Cost Dems Election appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

But there’s a deeper commentary on Harry Reid derived from his very own unconscious super intelligence (which we all possess) that reads him like a book. His super-intel reads his secret blind spots and confesses his true motivations.

This infinitely deeper intelligence tells the truth about himself in code between the lines. His super intel communicates in a language of projection, denial and symbolic imagery. Read past his literal statements about Trump and think of it as though he’s speaking figuratively, symbolically about himself. Exactly as Jesus famously warned that the fault a man finds in his neighbor (in this case, Trump) may well be the log in his own eye.

Such is the case here. Reid accurately reads who he is and confesses in his projections—which match his behavior. He’s actually the one instigating hate and bigotry.

His super-intel not only provides the most accurate take on Harry Reid, it also calls on him to correct his behavior. He teaches the world about his guilt and how it leads to his self-destructive behavior. America can then see the warning his confession presents and understand clearly what we must battle. Unknowingly Reid’s asking to be stopped for the good of America. He represents the far-left radical Democrats who have no intention of abating their unconscious sabotage of America.

Learn how to hear the unconscious language of projection and you will understand politics much more clearly. In that light we listen to Harry Reid’s super-intel communicating his true and deeper read on Donald Trump’s election as president.

Decoding Reid’s deeper message

Immediately after Trump’s election, Harry Reid immediately berated the president-elect, characterizing him as a “sexual predator who lost the popular vote and fueled his campaign with bigotry and hate.”

Step back and you will see that in one projection after another Reid is secretly reading himself. These are his own words telling us who he sees himself to be, deep down.

Consider the projection. The Democrats actually lost the vote that counts the most in the U.S. Electoral College. The Constitution put the Electoral College in place to assure that a candidate is popular across the entire country to prevent a few massive population centers such as New York City, California and Chicago from ruling the nation. Citizens outside these areas are not just “flyover country,” as Reid arrogantly implied. His comments reflect that he considers himself outside the rule of law.

Trump won 32 out of 50 states including Utah, where Reid attended college. Now consider Reid’s unconscious projection that that he’s a hateful predator violating constitutional law as he attacks a majority of voters in 32 states.

Reid is a divisive force bigoted against anyone who disagrees with him. In 2012 he overtly lied about Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney accusing him of tax evasion. As senate majority leader, Reid never crossed the aisle. Instead he continually obstructed Republican amendments from coming to a vote, and implemented a “nuclear option” (51 votes instead of 60) to push his agenda.

The Nevada senator commented on “watching white nationalists celebrate while innocent Americans cry tears of fear….”  At this moment his projection confession declares he’s the abusive white nationalistic democrat behaving like the Nazis (National Socialist Democratic Party), demanding the nation he wants apart from the election process. Reid supported the abusive policies of Barack Obama which left millions of innocent Americans in deep grief over the administration’s policies which were destroying the America they knew. These wounded Americans were the ones who elected Trump.

Unconsciously Reid sees that he is an anti-American senator helping carry out the attack on our nation. Deep down he’s also fearful over his unconscious guilt which announces a truth he can’t face.

In one brutal projection after another Reid continues his subconscious self-assessment of himself insisting that the media has normalized Trump who threatens “to tear families apart…and has directed crowds of thousands to intimidate reporters and assault African-Americans.” Secretly Reid sees himself as the one who continues tearing the American family apart, rationalizing his behavior as normal. He enables the protests of thousands around the country hoping to intimidate reporters into discounting Trump’s election. At the same time he assaults African-American protestors teaching them to attack the election process.

In classic omnipotent denial, Reid assures the Trump protestors’ “their fear is entirely rational” implying how his Democratic Party strategy was manipulating voters, controlling them by instilling irrational fear. His projection is clear: millions of rational Americans feared Reid’s attacks— voting for Trump to prevent them. Reid confesses his irrational disturbed attacks on the rule of law.

He further confesses who he is as he sees that Trump “may not possess the capacity to assuage the fears [of protestors].” The relentlessly brutal Reid knows he’s a fear-monger who continually fuels fear in America.

Yet his super-intel voice of wisdom presents to him a model of correction—how he ought to behave—encouraging him to see past his blind spot and help protestors see past their own irrationality for their own good and the country’s, finally settling into the rule of law.  But first Reid must acknowledge his unconscious super-intel that reads his blind spots—that his conscious mind is limited and often selfish, here attacking Trump beyond the pale. That would require self-awareness and introspection, possibly therapy to discover why he’s so vindictive. Obviously he prefers to attack rather than face his own pain and deficiencies.

So Reid continues his subconscious self-indictment with more word pictures in his gallery of hateful images insisting “the Electoral College does not absolve Trump of the grave sins he committed against millions of Americans.” The Nevada Democrat consumed by blind spots secretly confesses his attack on the fair election process and the Electoral College. Deep down he’s consumed by guilt reflected in his own words “the grave sins he continues to commit against millions of Americans”—who had a voice because of the Electoral College. Wisely the founders put it in place to prevent abusive demagogues like Reid from amassing complete national power by mobilizing a few large population areas. Reid secretly knows he’s a “grave sinner.”

Reid continues consciously talking about Trump, unconsciously talking about himself,
“If Trump [Reid] wants to roll back the tide of hate he unleashed, he has a tremendous amount of work to do and he must begin immediately.” In his heart of hearts—read his super-intel—Reid knows the unbridled hate he continually sets loose in America. His super-intel again offers him a model action: ‘There’s a lot of repenting to do, Harry, and do it now before it’s too late—cut out the hate.’

But severely guilty people routinely demonstrate a fatal error. Once they begin down the road of attacking others they invariably self-sabotage. In the end, they are nothing but destroyers who want to take everyone with them—even a nation full of people—as they slide toward self-destruction.

Reid is not alone in his unconscious projection take on himself and his party. In my recent book, The Stockholm Syndrome President, How Trump Triggered Obama’s Hidden Confession, I described how journalist Paul Krugman of the New York Times, a staunch Democrat, demonstrated a similar projection. In his March 14, 2016 editorial (“Trump is no accident”) Krugman projected his accurate unconscious read of the Democrat Party (and Reid) onto the Republicans and Trump.

To decode the projection Krugman saw that the Democrat Party has been taken over in recent years by a violent faction culminating in the dictatorial abuse of the nation by Obama and Beltway insiders such as Reid. Krugman called for purging the party and unconsciously made plain that Obama was an illegal citizen which could be proven by a forensic examination of his birth certificate. He urged such actions to restore the rule of law.

In this light, we can thank God for Harry Reid and his hidden confessions—guided by his super-intel, the internal truth-teller. We must see the significance of his unconscious confession of who he is (along with too many Democrats): irrational, a bigot ruled by hatred, outside the rule of law, who continually commits grave sins against America as he unconsciously tries to bury our nation.

As a result, we must continue waging a battle for America. Trump and the Republicans have their work cut out for them. They could start as our founders did and ask for God’s grace in overcoming their sinful enemy.

Many Christians believe it was a miracle that Trump won. Only the continued grace of God can defeat someone as determined to destroy America as Reid—self-righteously blind to what he’s doing. Surely we can pray for Reid’s healing but at the same time we must fight to stop Reid and radicals like him. We must battle on two fronts—spiritual and the body politic—confronting those who would divide us like Reid, the secret pillager who deep down knows exactly who he is.

This article ran on Freedomoutpost.com on 11/29/16

The post Decoding Democrat attacks: Predator Harry Reid confesses his attack on Trump and nation, Freedom Outpost appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

As a psychiatrist I specialize in forensic profiling and in addition the psychology of success. I work with people from all walks of life including highly successful business people and athletes who learn that navigating the waters of success can be far trickier than they had ever imagined.

You would think that by now Donald Trump has success mastered. Nothing could be further from the truth. He is now in a whole new ballgame attempting almost the impossible—to move from unbelievable success as a builder to becoming a successful politician and president of the United States in 16 months. He’s like a highly tuned world-class golfer who suddenly decides he’s going to become a classical violinist.  Nobody in modern political history has ever attempted what he has and come close to pulling it off.

Secretly he’s showing classic signs of success blindspots we can call retreats from success. He’s violating classic principles of success.

Amidst his surprising political success his self-defeating behavior puzzles many. It shouldn’t if we understood the unconscious pressure on him. In summary he show numerous sigs of limiting his success: his numerous overaggressive tweets, unnecessarily alienating Republicans who don’t support him, calling people names too often and especially defending himself when he’s attacked to the point he’s distracted. All this prevents him from playing to his significant strengths.

Trump recently in an interview with Rush Limbaugh at the end of October admitted to a cardinal sin—ignoring his advisors and political wisdom. He explained he wasn’t narcissistic but had to respond to attacks on him or his family instead of message discipline his advisors counselled. He’s demonstrating a conscious rationalization but his unconscious super-intelligence which reads him far better deep down— seeing through his unconscious denial— confessed he was retreating from his best.

(We have discovered an unconscious super-intel that reads us deep down in the blink of an eye and tries to help us past blindspots by communicating in key “thou protests too much” denials and key “log in my neighbors eye” projections along with other important ideas.)

First Trump was confessing his success blindspot to Limbaugh in essence by saying “my advisors don’t understand what I must do.” He thinks he must do what his conscious mind thinks best but unconsciously he’s confessing the log in his eye in a classic projection:  he doesn’t understand. His inner secret advisor and super-intel is telling him this.  He’s violating a fundamental rule of success not staying disciplined and on message (i.e. confront Hillary relentlessly and stay away from unimportant personal matters– you have limited time in this game. The clock is running out.)

He demonstrated another unconscious super-intel confession of success blindness as his campaign manager Kellyanne Conway told New York Magazine on October 29, 2016.  She confronted him with the magnitude of the election and the tremendous expectations of his supporters after he said, “I think we’ll win, and if not, that’s okay too.” Conway got angry telling him how much people believed in him, to look at his rallies—and he spent more on his dry cleaning bill than most supporters made.  But read through Trump’s retreat, “I’m okay with losing. I’m thinking of not winning.” A partial retreat for sure but a crucial one.

Looking back Conway missed a key stress of success—Trump’s wealth. He had had “more success than the law allows.” Deep down successful people can see it like that and out of an unconscious need to share they can back off and let someone else be successful.

Trump has demonstrated another subconscious reason for a success blindspot—the relentless attacks when you’re on top especially in a presidential election get old.

Trump has recently commented that in the past he’s normally had positive press and could handle negative press also, but he had never experienced such brutal personal attacks. As Vince Lombardi famously said, “tiredness can make cowards of us all”, meaning we can let up at key moments. And personal attacks make you more tired than you know. Trump has incredible fortitude but he’s a human being with limitations.

One other unique almost overpowering stress to him is that he’s in a new game for the first time. Ballplayers talk about how much they learn from the first game in a season to the second. Sometimes losing that first game reminds you how much you hate losing, or how hard it was to win and you could have put out more effort. Invariably people new to a particular arena can do better with experience, the great teacher. Later Trump will look back at things he could have done better but if he appreciated the success pressure on him now he could take a step further. Maybe it would be the difference in the election in a very close contest.

That’s where coaches and advisors come in. They see your blindspots because they’ve seen them before in the battle with other candidates and they can spot a weakness, a subconscious retreat such as: not playing to your strengths.  Good coaches can see further that players. Trump should know that as a CEO that he sees the goal better than his team. But new game, new day, and the tendency is to keep playing the familiar game of ‘I’m the coach’ instead of ‘I’m the player.’

These are just a few of the pressures of success. Surely history teaches us very successful people can have a problem handling success. Look at previous presidents: Richard Nixon did the stupid thing of covering up an insignificant Republican break-in to Democratic headquarters. Lying about it instead of apologizing he lost his presidency. George Bush the elder helped cost himself the 1992 presidency when he went back on his “read my lips I won’t raise taxes” policy.

So what can Trump do about it? Awareness, awareness, awareness. He doesn’t have time for in-depth success psychotherapy but sometimes just a new awareness of the real issue can make a difference.

The great Donald Trump has to learn that sometimes you stay great by listening because you are a limited human being. Sometime less is more: listen to the coach and play to your strengths. Don’t be a rookie and try to do too much.

And somebody please tell him about the unconscious retreat from success. Of course he’s trying hard to win but the little things can make a difference. Grasping success pressure can be one of those.

Trump politically has demonstrated he’s a good closer. Often counted out after crucial mistakes he has proved the political pundits wrong with one comeback after another.

Now he’s been presented a crucial gift as the panel of political experts (LeBoutillier, Cadell and Schoen) on Fox News “Political Insiders” show informed him on October 30^th.  With the new FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton’s emails being reopened, a Hillary Clinton presidency could throw the country into a constitutional crisis. Would Obama pardon her? Would she pardon herself? And all the while Hillary remains subject to an indictment regarding the Clinton Foundation and her misuse of it for monetary gain.

The astute panel of two Democrats and one Republican saw that Trump alone can make the case to the nation that such a Clinton presidency would throw the nation into turmoil no one can imagine. That Trump must present himself as a reasonable presidential alternative who can prevent this chaos giving the people a clear cut choice: peace or turmoil and how he would work with both sides of the aisle to steer America’s ship.

LeBoutillier, the Republican, recommended Trump with his wealth buy thirty minutes of time on national television and address the nation with a healing message to prevent the havoc. He insisted Trump can best make that case of the clear cut difference for the American people. Such a move would be bold and if Trump could also confine himself to message discipline this could swing the election.

Truly Trump could be a good closer if he played to his strength and in this case take his very best shot.

The post Donald Trump must overcome success blindspot appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

His word “suspense” implies an unfolding drama. Indeed, the depth of this drama is immeasurable. But Trump’s telling America a secret story.

His story is told through his super intelligence which quick reads situations before telling what it perceives between the lines. Trump’s super-intel is naturally attuned to other persons’ subconscious confessions.  They do so in the symbolic language of “protests too much” denial and “log in your eye” projection along with other key imagery.

His super-intel quick reads Hillary and the media and conveys his response indirectly in code.

There’s far more to the media’s insistence that Trump was violating rules by not accepting election results. The media asked, “Are you going to play by the rules of prior presidential candidates?” But the big picture behind this election focuses on presidents playing by the rules, specifically the rule of law.

Unconsciously Trump’s answer implied that the candidacy of his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton, raises serious rule of law questions.

For two weeks the media harangued Trump complaining he’d not played by society’s accepted rules of sexual conduct. That criticism continued while they ignored Hillary’s longtime enabling of her husband’s abusive sexual behavior and her documented harassment of his victims as well as her own sexual escapades. The media wanted to turn this sexual matter into the central rule of law issue while a far more important rule of law issue regarding the nation’s foundation still sits on the table.

As Roger L. Simon of pjmedia.com wrote on March 23, 2016, “The very backbone of our country was the rule of law.  Without [it]… America as we know it does not exist.” Simon declared Americans must be convinced that the FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email matter was handled justly and that Obama dare not interfere. Neither condition was satisfied. Obama avowed long before the Department of Justice ruled that Hillary was innocent.

Then FBI Director James Comey in July 2016 detailed many of Hillary’s rule of law violations and in a denial confession—reading through his “protests too much”—revealed she should have been prosecuted although Comey lacked the courage to see it through. (On October 28^th under pressure from newly discovered emails he reopened the investigation.)

As Simon warned, Democrats nominated an illegal candidate who should have been tried for breaking the law. Trump reiterated that Hillary shouldn’t have been allowed to run.
Trump also reading Obama’s law-breaking
Yet there’s a deeper, far more powerful story Trump unconsciously hints at—one which terrifies Democrats and the entire political class.

Trump demonstrates his subtle super-intel instincts. He’s far ahead of the media’s conscious take. Deep down, Trump focused on Barack Obama who facilitated Hillary Clinton’s violation of the law in her email scandal.

Trump alludes to a far more significant rule of law issue. His super-intel continues asking the greatest question regarding the legality of any presidential election in U.S. history: the question of Obama’s citizenship in 2008 and 2012.

From 2008 to 2015, Donald Trump stood strong, demonstrating presidential-type leadership by insisting on respect for the Constitution. He questioned Obama’s failure to produce evidence of legal U.S. citizenship. When Obama produced his alleged birth certificate under pressure in 2011, Trump was aware that Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s panel of document examiners declared it a phony.

The media buried the issue. Reporters abused millions of Americans, including Trump, by labeling them racist conspiracy theorists—a basic projection reflecting that the PC media was itself “enabling the Obama conspiracy” at the expense of our Constitution.

Don’t believe Trump’s no longer a birther. Only recently, to avoid media harassment, did he claim that he accepted Obama’s U.S. citizenship. But besides the birth issue, Trump saw that Obama continually functioned as an illegal president. To America’s detriment he repeatedly violated laws on a whim, for example by ignoring immigration laws.
When Obama continually neglected to protect America’s national security, Trump confronted him. Trump recognized Obama had increasingly enabled radical Islam terrorists while simultaneously building up terrorist Iran, even giving them a nuclear bomb on a layaway plan and cash money to boot.

Following the June 11, 2016 Orlando massacre perpetrated by a radicalized Islamic terrorist, Trump confronted Obama, observing that Obama wouldn’t identify the enemy—call them by their name, “radical Islamic terrorists”—and Trump suggested Obama unconsciously knew the many reasons he should resign the presidency.

On the surface, Obama became enraged, but unconsciously Trump elicited from Obama the most shocking confession imaginable. Secretly Obama wants the truth known.

On the heels of Trump’s challenge, Obama explained between the lines of two speeches on June 12 and 14, that he was truly a mind-controlled Stockholm Syndrome prisoner of radical Islam, programmed at an early age in his own home.

The decoded details are described in my book, The Stockholm Syndrome President, How Trump Triggered Obama’s Hidden Confession.

As he intuitively put together the story of his life, Obama learned the horrifying family secret that his Muslim father had wanted him aborted.

(My scientific forensic profiling approach confirmed that Obama’s super-intel imagery pointed toward a near abortion which matched his life’s circumstances including a promiscuous 17 year-old mother unexpectedly pregnant from a casual affair.)

His father had also emotionally “killed him” by abandoning him. Obama felt that pain on a daily basis, and then he learned that his father physically abused his mother and two later wives in Kenya.

The near-death by abortion and constant death experience at the hands of
his anti-American Muslim father became fixated in Obama’s mind. He became frozen in terror—suffering a deep early-childhood trauma—terrified that his father would kill him at any moment.

When he was a child, his father was radical Islam to him—both one and the same.
To stay alive Obama became an unconscious Stockholm Syndrome victim controlled by radical Islam—explaining his repeated capitulations to them as president and his curious refusal to use that term.

Obama’s Stockholm Syndrome remains buried deep in his psyche. Only his unconscious super-intel can tell his story in its psycholinguistic language. In his recent speeches, he unknowingly confessed in key images such as “doing the terrorists’ work for them” or key denials “then the terrorists would win. I’m not going to let that happen.”

But Obama further confessed in his June 14 speech, that he was programmed as “a radical Islam mole” to carry out a major robbery from America—first by stealing the rule of law and running as an illegal president.

In fact, Obama has robbed America in many ways: economically with massive debt and hampering business; robbed us of our borders with massive illegal immigration; of gains in racial harmony; of safe communities, of police safety, of inner city safety, of affordable health care, of military power and of our world leadership role. All the while his policies have strengthened terrorist Iran and radical Islam.

Now return to Trump’s threatened refusal to accept the election results. Consider his brilliant super-intel message to the media: “You keep America in suspense about how you avoid the rule of law both with Hillary Clinton and especially Obama, and I will keep you in suspense as to what I’ll do about it.”

Consciously Trump may not yet fully appreciate his deeper plans, but he hints at them strongly.

If Trump wins he could appoint a special committee of document examiners to study Obama’s birth certificate. As Obama and Clinton have reversed themselves on gay marriage, Trump could simply change his mind about the need to clarify Obama’s birthplace.

But if Trump loses he could still rise to the occasion by putting rule of law money behind a renewed investigation. He could potentially mobilize an abused citizenry. Rule of law Americans could demand Congress take action and legally obtain Obama’s birth records—as Obama himself, the traumatized child, has unconsciously encouraged. Obama’s super-intel, like Trump’s and all others, fully espouses the rule of law. And the need for America to re-embrace its moral compass is the most significant story of the election of 2016.

This story originally ran on Freedomoutpost.com on 11/2/16

The post Trump tells media secret Obama story behind the 2016 election, Freedom Outpost appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..