How do you think Barack Obama answered?

Millions of Americans had voted with their heart and soul praying to be delivered from Obama’s disastrous administration. As much as they disliked Hillary Clinton, this pro-Trump turnout was motivated more by Obama than by Hillary. The word on the street and in the conservative press was “Please, dear God, no Obama third term.”

Of course, since his narcissistic personality had suffered an unmistakably negative referendum, Obama would certainly engage in denial.

For Obama it was a time for a deeper super intelligence, soul-searching moment of true confession of his deepest, darkest secret—if you know how to decode projections, you will hear it. Simply take the topic he’s talking about and apply it to him.

To truly understand the often-irrational mind of Barack Obama—to put it clinically– we must grasp that Obama possesses an unconscious super intelligence that quick-reads him instantaneously and projects in specific imagery his huge flaws—proverbial logs in his eye—onto others.

But the projection also represents great wisdom and a model of correction if applied to himself (his super-intel’s goal). This monumental paradigm shift in psychology allows us to understand unconscious communication and the human mind’s startling super-intel awareness of conflicts and ideal resolution.

This new knowledge about the human mind allows us to fully grasp a man’s meaning.

And voters also possess an unconscious super-intel that secretly reads Obama’s projections and his contradictory behavior. This is the reason why people often say trust the voters—because voters pick up on the deeper truth, with exceptions such as the 2008 and 2012 elections.

Those exceptions were the result of the mistaken notion that America had to anoint its ‘first black president” to prove its national self-righteousness.

Back to the great question for Obama—“was the loss to Trump a referendum on you, sir?” Without the slightest hesitation in his Washington Post interview Obama descended into massive denial and then delivered a treatise on unconscious awareness and projection of exactly who he is. Listen up.

Illegal presidency imagery
In projection code—talking of Republicans but really of himself—he reveals in key imagery he’s an illegal president. He continues to admit how devastating that has been for the United States. Unconsciously he offers this as a central explanation why the Democrats lost the election. Secretly he sees that the people knew.

He strings together repeated imagery symbolic of his illegal presidency, together forming the thoughtprint pattern that confirms his unconscious symbology—the encoded central message.

First he warns that Republicans must “guard against a crude nationalism” taking root in the U.S. Think of it this way: as an illegal president Obama crudely claimed American citizenship outside the rule of law. Indeed, over the course of his administration he has continually violated one law after another.

He warns Republicans to guard against an exclusive “ethnic identity,” pointing to his exclusive role as “first black president” which allowed him to escape any vetting of his illegal presidency. Anyone who questioned his citizenship was immediately labeled racist. The media followed in lockstep labeling those who wanted him vetted as wacky birther conspiricists.

Obama further warned Republicans of “tribalism built around us and them,” again alluding to his tribal Kenyan birth. He divided the country into “us and them,” his supporters versus those who questioned his legality.

No discussion of an illegal presidency was allowed. It was “don’t question me” or “you’re involved in the birther conspiracy.” Could he really get away with hiding his complete records all the way to the White House? Indeed he did, before finally producing a phony birth certificate in 2011 as determined by Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse in Arizona’s Maricopa County. Of course the media ignored the finding.

Arpaio’s team has a new report due to be released on December 15 which should further substantiate Obama’s federal law violation with crucial new information. Of course the media will ignore the findings—ever the Obama legacy makers.

‘Mismatch’ indeed

Obama continues projecting. He said there was a “mismatch” between his 56 percent approval rating before the election and the Democrats losing the White House. He insisted, “people think I did a pretty good job.” Except he forgot about the far larger unconscious mind of voters and his own. First he confesses that, as an illegal president, he was a “mismatch” for the presidency.

He fails to understand that approval polls are conscious votes, but in a highly charged politically correct racial environment many will speak politely of him but vote differently. The groundswell for Trump reflected just how passionately people opposed Obama. Millions of Americans are understandably incensed at his treatment of them and their beloved country.

Deep down Obama’s super-intel sees that the people picked up on his great secret, his unconstitutional presidency. He explains how this was a major underlying factor in Trump’s election.

Obama recognized a common theme in populist movements her and in Europe—specifically referring to his illegal presidency. He declared that people had been disrupted “in very concrete ways” by “globalization.” In other words, his illegal global presidency resulted after he came to us secretly as a citizen from another part of the globe. No wonder he often showed more interest in other countries than America. That was a very concrete way of being a “global” president.

Obama’s super-intel imagery clarifies how citizens saw through his illegitimate presidency—either consciously or unconsciously. He sets up his punch line—the clearest image of his illegal presidency—when he commented, “psychologically people are less certain of their [his] national identities or their [his] place in the world. It starts looking different and disorienting.”

In other words, people caught on psychologically to his foreign national identity and his lack of place in America. Increasingly his decisions looked different—un-American. His illegal presidency was disorienting to citizens who had never seen anything like it.

Many Americans consciously realized he was an illegal president, but many others picked up on it in their intuitive far-seeing subconscious.

In another interview on December 8 with CNN’s Fareed Zakaria, Obama again confessed unconsciously that his presidency was illegal. He overtly mentioned the subject in a classic “thou protests too much” denial confession. He blamed opposition to his presidency on racism by prejudiced birthers—again linking it to Trump’s election. It’s as though he’s saying, “I must incessantly mention that I’m not an illegal president to secretly confess I am one. I cannot let the subject go—continually projecting my blame onto birthers. Secretly I know voters spotted this admission.”

The gospel of distorted thinking
Why is it crucial to grasp Obama’s subconscious confessions of his illegal presidency now? His guilt is fueling his distorted thinking as he tries to achieve his legacy goal of reshaping the opinion of millions of citizens.

Secretly he has every intention of carrying out an intellectual bloodbath, disorienting the people’s thinking—persuading from within, Alinsky-style—to embrace virtual lawlessness by calling it normal.

Convinced they are entitled to make up their own laws, millions have already  swallowed the mind-altering Kool-Aid. Everything goes, whatever I say is right, and if people learn to group-think like this—we will conquer the world as we destroy it and ourselves.

In another projection Obama confesses precisely how he gains a following by enabling others to violate the rule of law and in turn support his illegal presidency and irrational thinking. He notes how Republicans “dangerously discriminate” against minority groups and “prevent blacks, Latinos, or gays or women from participating in rebuilding America.”

But secretly he’s talking about himself, how he creates various groups of minority victims to discriminate against law-abiding citizens to divide the country.

In The Washington Post interview he continued to attack our culture, insisting conservatives lack character and values. He implemented his new moral compass with familiar propaganda buzz words such as fair, inclusive, non-discriminatory and uniting. But secretly he’s divisive, subverting the truth, subverting natural law.

The truth is whatever Obama wants to make it—because deep down like all rule violators he fears accountability to The One to whom our deeper moral compass points. But his all-seeing super-intel possesses a God-given natural law moral compass that compels him to tell the truth. Making up his own rules unknowingly violates his very essence.

Obama is not done doing his damage.

Obama’s the great divider because he himself has been deeply divided since birth. During his horrific childhood he was programmed to assault America as an unconscious Stockholm Syndrome victim to radical Islam. (See my book, The Stockholm Syndrome President: How Trump Triggered Obama’s Hidden Confession.) He truly remains a secret prisoner to destruction. Deep down he subconsciously confesses because he wants to be freed. Yet his shadow side continues to self-destruct.

This article ran on Freedomoutpost.com on 12/14/16

The post Obama Confesses Illegal Presidency Cost Dems Election appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

My clinical research in deeper unconscious communication reveals that people communicate verbally—but unknowingly—around important issues especially when they’re not telling the truth.

Actually this is familiar to most from the basic way Jesus described the deeper mind in his famous dictum (to paraphrase), “the flaw you see in your neighbor may be the far larger flaw you secretly see in yourself—but deny and project onto your neighbor.” His “log in your eye” parable perfectly parallels the recent discovery of the unconscious super intelligence, the dazzling new unconscious. The discovery of the super intelligence represents a major paradigm shift in knowledge about the mind, how we communicate and who we really are. In short, at important times while the conscious mind speaks literally the unconscious mind speaks symbolically—in code.

Basically I am a decoder—utilizing very specific principles such as the fact the deeper mind always reads a reality event, a living fact, and must tell the truth.

I have demonstrated in a new book (The Stockholm Syndrome President: How Trump Triggered Obama’s Hidden Confession) and a previous one (The Obama Confession) that Barack Obama’s super-intel has repeatedly confessed between the lines that he’s an illegal president (programmed by radical Islam to disrupt America). But he has a cohort in crime. The stunning fact is that Michelle Obama unconsciously matches his “illegal president” confession for confession.

Anti-birther extraordinaire Michelle Obama simply cannot let go of the nagging issue of her husband’s birthplace. She continually testifies to her “protest too much” denial and offers vivid super-intel imagery of her husband’s guilt. Pay close attention to her projections.

September 28, 2016, Campaign Speech for Hillary Clinton

In a recent speech in Philadelphia on behalf of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign she again slammed people who continue to believe that Barack Obama was born in Kenya. “There are those who questioned and continue to question for the past eight years whether my husband was even born in this country,” she said.

Her first vivid projection with its hidden confession indicates that she herself has continually questioned for eight years if her husband was born in the United States. It’s her way of saying, “I know he wasn’t.”  She strongly implies a conscious cover-up on both their parts. Facts will reveal this is indeed a projection. Don’t miss she must—
must—continue to confess his illegal presidency as we will see.

Notice she never offers any actual proof of his eligibility to run for president. Neither does her husband as both avoid mentioning, with rare exceptions, the 2011 birth certificate he unexpectedly produced. They don’t want to draw attention to it because after expert examination, it has been judged by to be fraudulent.

The First Lady continues unconsciously describing herself in her next projection as she attacks Donald Trump, “Let me say hurtful, deceitful questions deliberately designed to undermine his [Obama’s] presidency…cannot be blamed on others or swept under the rug by an insincere sentence uttered at a press conference.”

This lady again wants to dogmatically sweep the rule of law under the table regarding her husband’s presidency. She confesses to being deliberately hurtful and deceitful towards America, insincere at this press conference and blaming others (in this case Trump).

She wants to bully the truth and the rule of law as her husband has done for two terms and as a candidate. But don’t overlook her own super-intel confession: unable to live with the guilt, she specifically undermines her husband’s presidency implying it’s illegal. Unconsciously she demands the truth be known and tells the truth on herself. The super-intel moral compass always means business.

The evidence is convincing that she constantly attacks the truth in her projections. She knows he was never vetted as a presidential candidate, concealed his records while spending millions of dollars to do so, until finally under pressure in 2011 produced a fraudulent birth certificate as expert document examiners led by Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s committee declared.

Forensic document experts who found evidence of forgery in the long-form certificate included Joseph F. Newcomer, Paul Irey, Doug Vogt and Mara Zebest, an expert in Adobe Photoshop whose report was published by American Thinker.com. Software designer Tom Harrison, a man with more than 30 years’ experience in graphic design, called the birth certificate “a document far too complicated to be genuine.”

Mrs. Obama knows not one government person in Washington, D.C. has dared to examine or question the phony document—controlled by a politically correct conspiracy of the media and Beltway insiders. Congress ignored any possibility of fraud.
Michelle Obama relentlessly attacks so-called birthers by depicting anyone who doubts Obama’s legality as racist—ignoring the basic rule of law question. The fundamental propaganda campaign is designed to brainwash and mislead the public by a say-it-loud and say-it-often strategy. This is their only weapon against the truth except for one—the all-seeing super intelligence which must invariably tell the truth.

In this same September 28^th speech, she spoke to younger voters who are considering casting a third-party “protest vote” or even staying home on Election Day. In one specific projection after another she paints a picture of a presidential candidate whose election must still be protested—alluding on the surface to Trump but deep down to her husband.  Read her deeper instructions: citizens can still cast a protest vote against her husband by insisting the 2011 phony birth certificate be officially examined.

She hints that both she and her husband should have stayed home and never run for president, allowing another legal (“third party”) candidate to run.

Reviewing several recent speeches this year she repeatedly confesses to her husband’s illegitimate presidency in disguised language while incessantly berating birthers.

Democratic National Convention July 2016

Michelle Obama praised Hillary Clinton proclaiming that she is the only presidential candidate who could be trusted with the children of the nation. Seemingly digressing, she then makes a crucial link. She mentioned how her job in the White House was to teach her daughters “to ignore those who question their father’s citizenship or faith.” Read her denial confession: she had to teach her daughters to deny the truth of their father’s lack of U.S. citizenship. In her projections Michelle confesses unconsciously that she questions his presidency, knowing in fact that it’s illegal. In this light she cannot be trusted to tell her own children the truth much less the children of this nation—nor could her husband as a presidential candidate. She underscores both she and the president and are untrustworthy.

Her projection instruction “question her husband’s faith” suggests he has transgressed God’s laws on telling the truth and acted in bad faith. Implicitly she’s instructing American citizens to question her husband’s legal birth certificate (his citizenship) and his truthfulness. She hints also at the question of his Muslim loyalties over his U.S. loyalties—a perfect match for Obama’s hidden confession mentioned above that he is a Stockholm Syndrome victim of radical Islam.

Often the media portrays the birth controversy as a challenge to her husband’s constitutional qualification for office as a “natural born citizen.” But there are other challenges: did Barack Obama lie about the state of Hawaii having his birth certificate on file in the records department—while refusing to release it—and did he lie again by producing a fake birth certificate in 2011? Both matters are completely provable. Deep down Michelle renders the verdict: he lied and she lied—and she will return to this fact over and over.

Unequivocally her unconscious even this late in his presidency must tell us her husband is an illegal president. Why? She knows it’s too late for Congress to do anything about it—and that they never would do so on their own.

But unknowingly she’s trying to incite a birther protest movement to demand the birth certificate be officially examined. She knows that her husband will continue his programmed Stockholm Syndrome attack on America. Obama has already announced he will be unbelievingly active as a former president—an unofficial hyper-aggressive third term.  Unless we restore the rule of law and hold him accountable he will continue to undermine the very foundation of America.

http://freedomoutpost.com/michelle-obama-secretly-confesses-her-husband-is-an-illegal-president/

The post Michelle Obama secretly confesses her husband is an illegal president, Freedom Outpost appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..