His word “suspense” implies an unfolding drama. Indeed, the depth of this drama is immeasurable. But Trump’s telling America a secret story.

His story is told through his super intelligence which quick reads situations before telling what it perceives between the lines. Trump’s super-intel is naturally attuned to other persons’ subconscious confessions.  They do so in the symbolic language of “protests too much” denial and “log in your eye” projection along with other key imagery.

His super-intel quick reads Hillary and the media and conveys his response indirectly in code.

There’s far more to the media’s insistence that Trump was violating rules by not accepting election results. The media asked, “Are you going to play by the rules of prior presidential candidates?” But the big picture behind this election focuses on presidents playing by the rules, specifically the rule of law.

Unconsciously Trump’s answer implied that the candidacy of his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton, raises serious rule of law questions.

For two weeks the media harangued Trump complaining he’d not played by society’s accepted rules of sexual conduct. That criticism continued while they ignored Hillary’s longtime enabling of her husband’s abusive sexual behavior and her documented harassment of his victims as well as her own sexual escapades. The media wanted to turn this sexual matter into the central rule of law issue while a far more important rule of law issue regarding the nation’s foundation still sits on the table.

As Roger L. Simon of pjmedia.com wrote on March 23, 2016, “The very backbone of our country was the rule of law.  Without [it]… America as we know it does not exist.” Simon declared Americans must be convinced that the FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email matter was handled justly and that Obama dare not interfere. Neither condition was satisfied. Obama avowed long before the Department of Justice ruled that Hillary was innocent.

Then FBI Director James Comey in July 2016 detailed many of Hillary’s rule of law violations and in a denial confession—reading through his “protests too much”—revealed she should have been prosecuted although Comey lacked the courage to see it through. (On October 28^th under pressure from newly discovered emails he reopened the investigation.)

As Simon warned, Democrats nominated an illegal candidate who should have been tried for breaking the law. Trump reiterated that Hillary shouldn’t have been allowed to run.
Trump also reading Obama’s law-breaking
Yet there’s a deeper, far more powerful story Trump unconsciously hints at—one which terrifies Democrats and the entire political class.

Trump demonstrates his subtle super-intel instincts. He’s far ahead of the media’s conscious take. Deep down, Trump focused on Barack Obama who facilitated Hillary Clinton’s violation of the law in her email scandal.

Trump alludes to a far more significant rule of law issue. His super-intel continues asking the greatest question regarding the legality of any presidential election in U.S. history: the question of Obama’s citizenship in 2008 and 2012.

From 2008 to 2015, Donald Trump stood strong, demonstrating presidential-type leadership by insisting on respect for the Constitution. He questioned Obama’s failure to produce evidence of legal U.S. citizenship. When Obama produced his alleged birth certificate under pressure in 2011, Trump was aware that Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s panel of document examiners declared it a phony.

The media buried the issue. Reporters abused millions of Americans, including Trump, by labeling them racist conspiracy theorists—a basic projection reflecting that the PC media was itself “enabling the Obama conspiracy” at the expense of our Constitution.

Don’t believe Trump’s no longer a birther. Only recently, to avoid media harassment, did he claim that he accepted Obama’s U.S. citizenship. But besides the birth issue, Trump saw that Obama continually functioned as an illegal president. To America’s detriment he repeatedly violated laws on a whim, for example by ignoring immigration laws.
When Obama continually neglected to protect America’s national security, Trump confronted him. Trump recognized Obama had increasingly enabled radical Islam terrorists while simultaneously building up terrorist Iran, even giving them a nuclear bomb on a layaway plan and cash money to boot.

Following the June 11, 2016 Orlando massacre perpetrated by a radicalized Islamic terrorist, Trump confronted Obama, observing that Obama wouldn’t identify the enemy—call them by their name, “radical Islamic terrorists”—and Trump suggested Obama unconsciously knew the many reasons he should resign the presidency.

On the surface, Obama became enraged, but unconsciously Trump elicited from Obama the most shocking confession imaginable. Secretly Obama wants the truth known.

On the heels of Trump’s challenge, Obama explained between the lines of two speeches on June 12 and 14, that he was truly a mind-controlled Stockholm Syndrome prisoner of radical Islam, programmed at an early age in his own home.

The decoded details are described in my book, The Stockholm Syndrome President, How Trump Triggered Obama’s Hidden Confession.

As he intuitively put together the story of his life, Obama learned the horrifying family secret that his Muslim father had wanted him aborted.

(My scientific forensic profiling approach confirmed that Obama’s super-intel imagery pointed toward a near abortion which matched his life’s circumstances including a promiscuous 17 year-old mother unexpectedly pregnant from a casual affair.)

His father had also emotionally “killed him” by abandoning him. Obama felt that pain on a daily basis, and then he learned that his father physically abused his mother and two later wives in Kenya.

The near-death by abortion and constant death experience at the hands of
his anti-American Muslim father became fixated in Obama’s mind. He became frozen in terror—suffering a deep early-childhood trauma—terrified that his father would kill him at any moment.

When he was a child, his father was radical Islam to him—both one and the same.
To stay alive Obama became an unconscious Stockholm Syndrome victim controlled by radical Islam—explaining his repeated capitulations to them as president and his curious refusal to use that term.

Obama’s Stockholm Syndrome remains buried deep in his psyche. Only his unconscious super-intel can tell his story in its psycholinguistic language. In his recent speeches, he unknowingly confessed in key images such as “doing the terrorists’ work for them” or key denials “then the terrorists would win. I’m not going to let that happen.”

But Obama further confessed in his June 14 speech, that he was programmed as “a radical Islam mole” to carry out a major robbery from America—first by stealing the rule of law and running as an illegal president.

In fact, Obama has robbed America in many ways: economically with massive debt and hampering business; robbed us of our borders with massive illegal immigration; of gains in racial harmony; of safe communities, of police safety, of inner city safety, of affordable health care, of military power and of our world leadership role. All the while his policies have strengthened terrorist Iran and radical Islam.

Now return to Trump’s threatened refusal to accept the election results. Consider his brilliant super-intel message to the media: “You keep America in suspense about how you avoid the rule of law both with Hillary Clinton and especially Obama, and I will keep you in suspense as to what I’ll do about it.”

Consciously Trump may not yet fully appreciate his deeper plans, but he hints at them strongly.

If Trump wins he could appoint a special committee of document examiners to study Obama’s birth certificate. As Obama and Clinton have reversed themselves on gay marriage, Trump could simply change his mind about the need to clarify Obama’s birthplace.

But if Trump loses he could still rise to the occasion by putting rule of law money behind a renewed investigation. He could potentially mobilize an abused citizenry. Rule of law Americans could demand Congress take action and legally obtain Obama’s birth records—as Obama himself, the traumatized child, has unconsciously encouraged. Obama’s super-intel, like Trump’s and all others, fully espouses the rule of law. And the need for America to re-embrace its moral compass is the most significant story of the election of 2016.

This story originally ran on Freedomoutpost.com on 11/2/16

The post Trump tells media secret Obama story behind the 2016 election, Freedom Outpost appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..

My clinical research in deeper unconscious communication reveals that people communicate verbally—but unknowingly—around important issues especially when they’re not telling the truth.

Actually this is familiar to most from the basic way Jesus described the deeper mind in his famous dictum (to paraphrase), “the flaw you see in your neighbor may be the far larger flaw you secretly see in yourself—but deny and project onto your neighbor.” His “log in your eye” parable perfectly parallels the recent discovery of the unconscious super intelligence, the dazzling new unconscious. The discovery of the super intelligence represents a major paradigm shift in knowledge about the mind, how we communicate and who we really are. In short, at important times while the conscious mind speaks literally the unconscious mind speaks symbolically—in code.

Basically I am a decoder—utilizing very specific principles such as the fact the deeper mind always reads a reality event, a living fact, and must tell the truth.

I have demonstrated in a new book (The Stockholm Syndrome President: How Trump Triggered Obama’s Hidden Confession) and a previous one (The Obama Confession) that Barack Obama’s super-intel has repeatedly confessed between the lines that he’s an illegal president (programmed by radical Islam to disrupt America). But he has a cohort in crime. The stunning fact is that Michelle Obama unconsciously matches his “illegal president” confession for confession.

Anti-birther extraordinaire Michelle Obama simply cannot let go of the nagging issue of her husband’s birthplace. She continually testifies to her “protest too much” denial and offers vivid super-intel imagery of her husband’s guilt. Pay close attention to her projections.

September 28, 2016, Campaign Speech for Hillary Clinton

In a recent speech in Philadelphia on behalf of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign she again slammed people who continue to believe that Barack Obama was born in Kenya. “There are those who questioned and continue to question for the past eight years whether my husband was even born in this country,” she said.

Her first vivid projection with its hidden confession indicates that she herself has continually questioned for eight years if her husband was born in the United States. It’s her way of saying, “I know he wasn’t.”  She strongly implies a conscious cover-up on both their parts. Facts will reveal this is indeed a projection. Don’t miss she must—
must—continue to confess his illegal presidency as we will see.

Notice she never offers any actual proof of his eligibility to run for president. Neither does her husband as both avoid mentioning, with rare exceptions, the 2011 birth certificate he unexpectedly produced. They don’t want to draw attention to it because after expert examination, it has been judged by to be fraudulent.

The First Lady continues unconsciously describing herself in her next projection as she attacks Donald Trump, “Let me say hurtful, deceitful questions deliberately designed to undermine his [Obama’s] presidency…cannot be blamed on others or swept under the rug by an insincere sentence uttered at a press conference.”

This lady again wants to dogmatically sweep the rule of law under the table regarding her husband’s presidency. She confesses to being deliberately hurtful and deceitful towards America, insincere at this press conference and blaming others (in this case Trump).

She wants to bully the truth and the rule of law as her husband has done for two terms and as a candidate. But don’t overlook her own super-intel confession: unable to live with the guilt, she specifically undermines her husband’s presidency implying it’s illegal. Unconsciously she demands the truth be known and tells the truth on herself. The super-intel moral compass always means business.

The evidence is convincing that she constantly attacks the truth in her projections. She knows he was never vetted as a presidential candidate, concealed his records while spending millions of dollars to do so, until finally under pressure in 2011 produced a fraudulent birth certificate as expert document examiners led by Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s committee declared.

Forensic document experts who found evidence of forgery in the long-form certificate included Joseph F. Newcomer, Paul Irey, Doug Vogt and Mara Zebest, an expert in Adobe Photoshop whose report was published by American Thinker.com. Software designer Tom Harrison, a man with more than 30 years’ experience in graphic design, called the birth certificate “a document far too complicated to be genuine.”

Mrs. Obama knows not one government person in Washington, D.C. has dared to examine or question the phony document—controlled by a politically correct conspiracy of the media and Beltway insiders. Congress ignored any possibility of fraud.
Michelle Obama relentlessly attacks so-called birthers by depicting anyone who doubts Obama’s legality as racist—ignoring the basic rule of law question. The fundamental propaganda campaign is designed to brainwash and mislead the public by a say-it-loud and say-it-often strategy. This is their only weapon against the truth except for one—the all-seeing super intelligence which must invariably tell the truth.

In this same September 28^th speech, she spoke to younger voters who are considering casting a third-party “protest vote” or even staying home on Election Day. In one specific projection after another she paints a picture of a presidential candidate whose election must still be protested—alluding on the surface to Trump but deep down to her husband.  Read her deeper instructions: citizens can still cast a protest vote against her husband by insisting the 2011 phony birth certificate be officially examined.

She hints that both she and her husband should have stayed home and never run for president, allowing another legal (“third party”) candidate to run.

Reviewing several recent speeches this year she repeatedly confesses to her husband’s illegitimate presidency in disguised language while incessantly berating birthers.

Democratic National Convention July 2016

Michelle Obama praised Hillary Clinton proclaiming that she is the only presidential candidate who could be trusted with the children of the nation. Seemingly digressing, she then makes a crucial link. She mentioned how her job in the White House was to teach her daughters “to ignore those who question their father’s citizenship or faith.” Read her denial confession: she had to teach her daughters to deny the truth of their father’s lack of U.S. citizenship. In her projections Michelle confesses unconsciously that she questions his presidency, knowing in fact that it’s illegal. In this light she cannot be trusted to tell her own children the truth much less the children of this nation—nor could her husband as a presidential candidate. She underscores both she and the president and are untrustworthy.

Her projection instruction “question her husband’s faith” suggests he has transgressed God’s laws on telling the truth and acted in bad faith. Implicitly she’s instructing American citizens to question her husband’s legal birth certificate (his citizenship) and his truthfulness. She hints also at the question of his Muslim loyalties over his U.S. loyalties—a perfect match for Obama’s hidden confession mentioned above that he is a Stockholm Syndrome victim of radical Islam.

Often the media portrays the birth controversy as a challenge to her husband’s constitutional qualification for office as a “natural born citizen.” But there are other challenges: did Barack Obama lie about the state of Hawaii having his birth certificate on file in the records department—while refusing to release it—and did he lie again by producing a fake birth certificate in 2011? Both matters are completely provable. Deep down Michelle renders the verdict: he lied and she lied—and she will return to this fact over and over.

Unequivocally her unconscious even this late in his presidency must tell us her husband is an illegal president. Why? She knows it’s too late for Congress to do anything about it—and that they never would do so on their own.

But unknowingly she’s trying to incite a birther protest movement to demand the birth certificate be officially examined. She knows that her husband will continue his programmed Stockholm Syndrome attack on America. Obama has already announced he will be unbelievingly active as a former president—an unofficial hyper-aggressive third term.  Unless we restore the rule of law and hold him accountable he will continue to undermine the very foundation of America.

http://freedomoutpost.com/michelle-obama-secretly-confesses-her-husband-is-an-illegal-president/

The post Michelle Obama secretly confesses her husband is an illegal president, Freedom Outpost appeared first on Andrew G. Hodges, M.D..